Anonymous Preps Release of 2.6GB of Haditha Documents
Anonymous is apparently planning to release a massive stockpile of confidential information relating to the 2005 Haditha massacre, in which 24 unarmed Iraqi men, women and children were killed by U.S. Marines.
Anonymous hackers claim to have obtained 2.6 GB of emails from Puckett Faraj, a law firm that represents Frank Wuterich, who is accused of leading the group of Marines in Haditha.
Wuterich recently agreed in a plea deal that his rank will be reduced from staff sergeant to private as a result of the alleged war crime. Prosecutors agreed to drop all 13 charges against Wuterich, which could have resulted in a life-in-prison sentence, in return. Anonymous noted that it will be posting “detailed records, transcripts, testimony, trial evidence, and legal defense donation records” on Pirate Bay.
The U.S. Naval Institute has reacted with a blog post entitled "Wargame Your Information". The advice to personnel is to take extra precaution to keep information safe as "cyber spies, vandals, and merry pranksters are going to always test."
- Apple, Creative Sued Over Random Play Integration in Cars
- Stanford Scientists Use Light to Weld Nanowires
- 50 Million Tweets Are a Waste of Time Each Day
- Google's Solve for X Website Goes Online
- 83-year-old Woman Gets a 3D-printed Lower Jaw Implant
- Verizon Chooses Redbox for Video Streaming Service
- Sony's 2012 Changes Start With Renaming PSN
- Samsung Hits Out at Apple with Galaxy Note Super Bowl Ad
- Neil Young Says MP3 Isn't Good Enough; Neither Are CDs
- Nokia's Lumia 800 Reaching States on Feb 14 as Bundle
- Bill to Tax Violent Video Games Introduced in Oklahoma
- Samsung Quad-core Galaxy S III Reportedly Just 7mm Thick
- Google's HUD Glasses Sound Awesome
- Chrome Browser Launches On Android -- Finally!
- Eco Marine Unveils Massive Solar Oil Tanker Concept
- Best Buy Survey Describes $1499 42-inch Apple TV
- Verizon/Redbox Streaming Service Just Got Bigger
- Matching Algorithm Claim of Online Dating Sites Likely False
- Logitech Releases Cool Touch-Based Mouse


Look, something else that isn't going to happen.
2.6GB of emails?
Can they release anything on aliens?
Doing this is going to accomplish what exactly?
Someone should take the emails and other personal information of the members of anonymous and post it all around the net.
2.6GB of emails?
RTFA
“detailed records, transcripts, testimony, trial evidence, and legal defense donation records”
2.6GB of just text-based e-mails?
There's gotta be some photos or videos in those e-mails...
It is pretty shocking that that guy led a massacre and is getting nothing but a rank reduction...
This is one instance where I support Anonymous.
Go Anonymous ! Show the truth the world should know it !
It's kinda like the cover-up the Army attempted with the Pat Tillman friendly fire killing.
The US military, under George Bush's lead, is almost as bad as the KGB back in the day...
that would be a good thing. pure information for everyone to draw their own conclusions.
It is pretty shocking that that guy led a massacre and is getting nothing but a rank reduction.
The least amount done draws the least amount of attention. This is something the military would rather people simply forget about. Recruitment numbers suffer do to times of unpopular wars or when a terrible act by their hand is done and gets major coverage. They are simply doing what is best for themselves and arguably the security of the nation.
[citation][nom]mobrocket[/nom]i think its funny how we create soldiers to be killers when we want and normal the next minutesome people cant just turn off that switch... maybe if the military wasnt used as a police force to protect corporate interests things would be much different.[/citation
Thank You for the truth
Retired USMC
Thank You, thank you, fu u drive ppl crazy(mccMe), but thx n e way, 'The advice to personnel is to take extra precaution to keep information safe '.
Good idea.
People the world over, have 1 choice(oxymoron) of an operating system. It is software that needs constant updates and fixes, and the basic 'ol rant of 'yous get a FAKE sense of security.'
Out of respect i'll leave the company nameless, but its initials are, 'Microsoft Windows'
2.6GB of emails?
That's not that many, some staff at my workplace have outlook PST files that contain all of the emails corrupt after 2GB.
(Importance of info)*(Efforts put into coverup)=(Probability of coverup failing)
The problem is that a lot of "kids" in the military are just that, kids. Put them in a high stress environment, give them an M16, give them a position and power, and voila, Haditha happened.
Ironic that one soldier responsible committing a massacre get a pay cut, and another other soldier responsible for blowing the whistle on a massacre gets charged with treason.
2.6GB of emails?
i have to imagine that much of that is attachments, and non digitised (forms, and other crap that that got printed out, but was never in a simple small file, but an image) records
Doing this is going to accomplish what exactly? Someone should take the emails and other personal information of the members of anonymous and post it all around the net.
do something very wrong (war crime)... get demotion
do something fairly good (yea i am saying good, more often than not)... would be assassinated
The problem is that a lot of "kids" in the military are just that, kids. Put them in a high stress environment, give them an M16, give them a position and power, and voila, Haditha happened.
define kid... because they are adults... my be young adults, but adults none the less.
2.6GB of emails?
Ya, I guess they should have compressed it with 7zip! LZMA/PPMD
...who cares.
The least amount done draws the least amount of attention. This is something the military would rather people simply forget about. Recruitment numbers suffer do to times of unpopular wars or when a terrible act by their hand is done and gets major coverage. They are simply doing what is best for themselves and arguably the security of the nation.
I was going to thumbs up you because you were speaking truth about it being in the military's best interest to quiet this quickly, but then you said "...arguably for the security of the nation." Get your facts straight. The Iraq War had NOTHING to do with American security. It was, retroactively excused as, for Iraqi freedom.
It definitely decreased American security because it increased the hostility towards America in the region as they now have to fear an unprovoked American attack even if they comply with ALL American requests.
I was going to thumbs up you because you were speaking truth about it being in the military's best interest to quiet this quickly, but then you said "...arguably for the security of the nation." Get your facts straight. The Iraq War had NOTHING to do with American security. It was, retroactively excused as, for Iraqi freedom.It definitely decreased American security because it increased the hostility towards America in the region as they now have to fear an unprovoked American attack even if they comply with ALL American requests.
It seems you and others have misunderstood me, I am not taking the side of such I am simply pointing out that it is a debated topic. I do apologize for not making this clear.
Nor was I even speaking about the war in Iraq per say, rather the actions that can be done in war that the public will not respond favorably to.
We have a volunteer military that tries not to have to draft. Due to this public opinion matters greatly if we hear about the deaths of innocent people who died at the hands of our military or any other unfavorable action recruitment will slow down for a period of time. Iraq became a very unpopular war that already hurt recruitment. Certainly the actions done to sweep things under the rug for their own interest is immoral. Some (Not I) excuse this as a form of necessity.
It seems you and others have misunderstood me, I am not taking the side of such I am simply pointing out that it is a debated topic. I do apologize for not making this clear.Nor was I even speaking about the war in Iraq per say, rather the actions that can be done in war that the public will not respond favorably to.We have a volunteer military that tries not to have to draft. Due to this public opinion matters greatly if we hear about the deaths of innocent people who died at the hands of our military or any other unfavorable action recruitment will slow down for a period of time. Iraq became a very unpopular war that already hurt recruitment. Certainly the actions done to sweep things under the rug for their own interest is immoral. Some (Not I) excuse this as a form of necessity.
If you meant that the military is "doing what is best for...arguably the security of the nation", then that's true as a blanket statement. Now I understand what you mean and agree with it.
As an organization, I completely understand their decision to do what it best for themselves in attempting to quietly end the saga of this massacre. But it is the responsibility of free people to not allow an injustice to pass. And people are doing their job of criticizing this move.
The fact is, you can put people in military prison pretty easily (compared to normal prison). There should have initially been greater disciplinary action, if only to save face, and even if it was only 2 years in a military prison for a couple of those involved.
Further proof that if you don't want something getting into other people's hands, don't put it on an internet-facing server. There are always vulnerabilities, whether technical or social.
I find it somewhat amusing that apparently the Naval Institute opted for the term "Merry Pranksters," for what was apparently their chosen term for Anonymous there. Of course, I can't really tell the context, since it appears that that blog post has since been taken down; the link provided is dead, and a quick look over the site reveals a post by that name... Which appears to have been removed.
Meanwhile, I'm somewhat mixed on the punishment; yes, a "mere rank reduction" may come across as lenient, though I noted that it wasn't simply a single grade of drop, (which would've been to "Sergeant") but rather one all the way to "Private;" for those a bit familiar with the US Marine Corps' rank structure know that "Private" is not just the lowest rank, but one from which promotion out of (to "Private First Class" which roughly equates the ORDINARY "Private" in the US Army) comes automatically upon a certain amount of time spent enlisted; in prior years, the equivalent rank in the US Army was actually called "Recruit."
This sort of demotion implies that this rank is to be permanent; in terms of demotion, it's the stiffest penalty possible. In the context of the USMC, this is an incredibly degrading thing; he's been permanently relegated to forever be that rank, and that's what will officially be recorded on the rolls when he leaves the Marines. Of course, not that this would be sufficient punishment given that this is hardly an issue that rests entirely within the USMC.
Someone will qualify for treason if this is released. It is ridiculous to blow such an incident out of proportion, this kind of crap happened every week in Vietnam.
If someone did something wrong (read: criminal) they will be punished and that's it. Mind your own ****** business.
reveal 911
First, if one side in a war does not wear a uniform easily recognizable from civilian wear they give up their Geneva Convention rights. They are infact considered spies not soldiers at that point. There is nothing that covers what happens to spies. IE By the Geneva Conventions spies can be tortured.
Next, One of the reasons the Geneva conventions were written was to protect the civilian population from this sort of violence. However, when the enemy does not were a uniform, hides in schools, churches, hospitals and behind any crowd it can find I think it is reasonable to expect a bunch of civilian casualties.
Finally, with that type of atmosphere you will breed a certain amount of callousness/contempt for the civilians. In a perfect world this would not happen but this world is not perfect.
so, the weight of a Staff Seargeant's rank is the same weight leading the massacre of 24 unarmed men, women, and children? just, wow
Im supporting Anonymous on this one.
so, the weight of a Staff Seargeant's rank is the same weight leading the massacre of 24 unarmed men, women, and children? just, wowIm supporting Anonymous on this one.
I agree that his punishment is severe but its to serve as an example.
If you meant that the military is "doing what is best for...arguably the security of the nation", then that's true as a blanket statement. Now I understand what you mean and agree with it.As an organization, I completely understand their decision to do what it best for themselves in attempting to quietly end the saga of this massacre. But it is the responsibility of free people to not allow an injustice to pass. And people are doing their job of criticizing this move.The fact is, you can put people in military prison pretty easily (compared to normal prison). There should have initially been greater disciplinary action, if only to save face, and even if it was only 2 years in a military prison for a couple of those involved.
Did I get "thumbed down" for saying an organization is expected to do what is best for it? Obviously, an organization should do what is best, but that's not what I expect--just what I hope they do.
Go there, see the horrible stuff that happens, then talk. After being there and being shot at by a dozen kids that are having a hard time even lifting the weapons, you get a level of distrust for people. I pulled gate guard, and saw several innocent looking people try to kill us (moms kids old).
I dont know anything about this case in particular but many of the style are wrongly looked at by the public.