Judge: Papermaster Could Cause Irreparable Damage to IBM
According to court documents recently unsealed, the judge presiding over the IBM versus Papermaster lawsuit banned the latter party from working at Apple because he felt it would result in irreparable damage for IBM.
At the time of ruling there was plenty of information floating around as to why Papermaster felt he should be allowed to take up his position at the Cupertino company, however the same could not be said for Judge Kenneth Karas, who ordered Papermaster to step back from his position at Apple until further notice.
ComputerWorld reports that Karas ordered Papermaster to leave the company just because he might cause "irreparable harm" to IBM. The judge explained why he felt the temporary injunction was justified in recently unsealed documents.
“Because Mr. Papermaster has been inculcated with some of IBM’s most sensitive and closely guarded technical and strategic secrets, it is no great leap for the Court to find that Plaintiff has met its burden of showing a likelihood of irreparable harm."
The opinion throws off Mr. Papermaster’s own claims that Apple and IBM are not competing companies. Judge Karas said that Papermaster is likely to draw on his 20-plus years of experience from IBM while working at Apple to make sure the iPhone and iPod are are fitted with the best possible microprocessor technology and at a lower cost.
Read the full story on ComputerWorld.
- Second UK iPhone Ad Banned by Advertising Authority
- Gamestop expects Wii shortages
- Lenovo Unveils SMS Laptop Executions
- Microsoft Snags "The Guild" Season 2
- Nintendo Caves In to Wii Speak Complaints
- YouTube Goes Widescreen
- Blockbuster Introduces Set Top Movies Box
- Facebook Wins Monster Spam Suit
- Google to Lay Off 10,000? Doubtful
- BlackBerry OS v4.5 Officially Released
- T-Mobile's G1 Android Phone Now in White
- Internet Worm Attacks Windows...Again
- Nintendo Launches Mario DS for Black Friday
- Spam Stikes Back: Botnets Return
- Nokia Withdraws From Japan
- Pretend to Know Future; Make Money
- Black Friday Sales Booming Despite Recession
- Using Phone While Driving Makes You Old and Drunk
- Intel: Netbooks Only "Fine for an Hour"
Shenanigans!!!
HA! in your face apple! : P
Oh I thought this was about the papermaster software, not some guy named papermaster ...
In other words: IBM 'ownes' Mr Papermaster..... I wonder if that is going to hold up in higher courts.
Ofcourse is Apple going to benefit from his experience, that is the whole point of hiring him, it is the point of every employer for hiring any employee. Duh.
The judge is an idiot. How can a judge in New York assert jurisdiction over some who worked in Texas and now in California. You have to sue the person in their home state . Both Texas and California refuse to uphold non compete clauses .
The lawsuit is in Federal District Court, not state court. That is the proper court in a dispute such as this with a corporation based in New York, an employee working for the corporation in Texas and another company headquartered in California.
Besides, this ruling only applies to the temporary order preventing papermaster from working at Apple. It is not the final outcome in this case. Believe it or not this is just a contract dispute. Often times courts will uphold the temporary injuctions until the matter at the heart of the issue is sorted out. Maybe better than letting him work for 3 months then having a ruling that he is actually in violation and forcing him to leave for two years.
umm all these articles stated that the noncompetiton agreement was for one year and that he signed it in october 07 (i believe) and he went to apple in november of 08.
At least thats what i remember. (disclaimer, correct if incorrect)
so going by this the whole case is pointless and a total waste for IBM.
The owners in this country want to own you: your labor, your body, and your mind. It is ludicrous that people put up with these non-compete agreements. If we all agreed together not to sign them the corporate world would be SOL.
United we stand, divided we fall.
The owners in this country want to own you: your labor, your body, and your mind. It is ludicrous that people put up with these non-compete agreements. If we all agreed together not to sign them the corporate world would be SOL.United we stand, divided we fall.
It's not just corporations either. Colleges, institutions setup to develop young minds into focused tools, assert the same control over their students. Anything created by a student belongs to the school. When you have to come up with that killer thesis project, don't over-do it, you still want something you can work on/market after you graduate.
These organizations promote and encourage new thinking and development of new ideas, then punish the individual when those ideas take them in a direction that dissagrees with the coporation (i.e. obviously Papermaster had a reason to leave IBM).
Papermaster may have enough in savings to live without working for a year, but how would most people survive, get a job in a completely unrelated field, while their skills degrade after a year of disuse? Sure, Papermaster shouldn't get to use IBM blue-prints or anything, but to say his experience is a threat is obsurd. Experience is all any employee ever has to market themselves.
crosshairs: noncompetition agreements start their clock from the date of termination, not from the date you sign the agreement (i.e. IBM says "If you leave this company, you can't work for our competitor for a year."