Download the
Tom's Guide App from the AppsStore
News and trends on internet
/ mobile / "sound & picture" / IT
Yes No

Hands On With Google's Music Beta Service

- By - Source : Tom's Guide US

We take a look at Google's just-launched Music Beta virtual locker. How does it stand up against Amazon's Cloud Player?

Earlier this month during Google I/O 2011, the search engine giant launched its long-awaited "Music Beta," a cloud-based digital locker that allows Googlers to store and stream their favorite music to the PC or mobile Android device. The company boasted a capacity of up to 20,000 songs that users can max out for free until the beta tag is finally dropped at an undisclosed date.

But like Amazon's Cloud Player, Google was unable (or unwilling) to obtain music licenses from the major record labels. "We’ve been in negotiations with the industry for a different set of features, with mixed results," Google told Billboard the night before the announcement was made. "[But] a couple of major labels were less focused on innovation and more on demanding unreasonable and unsustainable business terms."

According to unnamed sources, Google actually tried to get publishers to agree in letting consumers scan their CD bar codes into the Google music database. This would "unlock" digital masters provided by the record labels, preventing users from ripping their CDs or purchasing additional digital copies. But negotiations with Sony Music and Universal Music collapsed, so Google decided to launch the service "as is."

Currently Google is only allowing access to Google Music Beta via personal invite. The service itself is exactly what reports claim: a digital locker for your music allowing storage for up to 20,000 songs. The library is accessible from any computer, but locked down to eight external devices. Still, that's not too shabby considering a few subscription music services lock down only one external device until users pay an additional fee. Music Beta users can authorize and deauthorize additional devices simply by accessing the Settings menu.

As expected, users are required to install a Music Manager, a simple little program that hovers in the background and waits for the user to dump new music files into a specific location. These files can be yanked from anywhere on the hard drive: the iTunes folder, My Music folder, the Windows Media Player, or wherever else music is stored. There's also an option for Music Beta to upload automatically, manually, or at most once per hour/day/week.

As we've already seen, music can be streamed from Google's servers to the Music Beta browser-based PC client or to the refreshed Music app for Android. Under the app's Settings menu, users choose the correct Google account which thus unlocks settings such as "Cache music," "Stream music via Wi-Fi only," "Download via Wi-Fi only," "Download queue" and "Hide unavailable music." All songs stored on the Music Beta servers will thus appear in the Music app listing, and can be downloaded/cached quickly by pressing the Menu button and choosing the "Make available offline" selection. The on-device list can also be filtered from "All music" to "Offline only" to reduce clutter.

The biggest surprise with Google's Music Beta service however was the inclusion of free music. Upon setting up the account on the PC, Google asks for preferred genres including Alternative/Indie, Dance/Electronic, Hip-Hop/Rap, Metal, Pop, R&B/Soul, Rock and more. Out of those seven categories alone, Google dumped 198 free songs into the account ranging from Blue Oyster Cult's "Godzilla" to Warrant's "Cherry Pie." There's no indication that the music is a permanent fixture, or if they're simply temporary samples for testing the service's streaming capabilities and overall quality.

As for the PC version's interface, it's extremely simple. The left "My Library" tab/column is broken into four segments: the song-type area, "Auto Playlists" (Thumbs Up, Recently Added, Free Songs), "Instant Mixes" and "Playlists." The song type area consists of "New and Recent," "Songs," "Artists," "Albums" and "Genres" which open up into the larger tabbed area to the right of the "My Library" column. Along the bottom of the screen, users can access controls like pause, play, forwards, backwards, shuffle and repeat. Users can also vote "thumbs up" and "thumbs down," and even control the music volume within the browser.

So is Google's Music Beta better than Amazon's Cloud Player? Visually Music Beta is more appealing, but both seemingly offer the same service. Clearly the additional free music from Google doesn't hurt, but Amazon may have the upper hand simply because it also sells digital music which can be added to the Cloud Player storage at no additional cost or virtual space.

On the other hand, Google's Music Beta is native to the Android OS, and right now it's offering a 20,000-song capacity until the beta ends. Final pricing for Google's music storage is unknown, but Amazon is currently offering 20 GB free for an entire year after purchasing a digital album. After that, 20 GB is $20 per year whereas 5 GB of space is free.

With Google's Music Beta, there's certainly room for improvement, but the service is fresh out of the oven and clearly indicates that Google is working on something larger behind-the-scenes. With the launch of the "Movies" section on the Android Market, it's not difficult to see Google launching a "Music" section in the near future, allowing users to purchase digital albums and tracks, and store them in Music Beta for free.

But right now, consumers are bombarded with talk of cloud-based music lockers, and Apple has yet to reveal its hand. Yet by looking at the overall big picture, music lovers could simply spread their library across a huge-yet-free cloud consisting of Google, Amazon, mSpot and a few others. It would just a matter of remembering what each free service stores, and then launching the appropriate app/web-player.

Share:
11
Comments
X

Comments

Anonymous 05/24/2011 9:19 PM
Hide
-0+

Google was a bit too late. Now that Ghosttown is on the market, all other music apps seem a bit obsolete.

Anonymous 05/24/2011 10:53 PM
Hide
-0+

I was one of the invitees and am using the service. Although 1/8 of my music has downloaded, I am already listening to my tracks on my phone and on my work PC (my music sits in my home laptop). I am impressed and looking forward to buying music from Google since the experience is so seamless.

flightmare 05/24/2011 11:21 PM
Hide
-1+

Reminds me of the Ubuntu Music Store with these colors and lay-out.

dkant1n 05/24/2011 11:27 PM
Hide
-0+

Sounds like an excellent service. They were late but they can impose their app by making it native on Android, you can still use other but most people won't

Villers 05/25/2011 12:09 PM
Hide
-0+

Supports flac (a biggy for me),The decent free tracks were a pleasant surprise. working good so far.

virtualban 05/25/2011 11:58 AM
Hide
-0+

fsdf23fefa :
I've just red, blah blah blah, $$$$$, blah blah blah. typical for these music could thingies.


:) :) that sums it up nicely for my viewpoint.

eddieroolz 05/26/2011 3:27 AM
Hide
-0+

Meh, its Google. They'll simply put an advertisement all over their pages (like with Chrome) and eventually people will use it, because Google can't do no evil, right?

Anonymous 05/26/2011 3:58 AM
Hide
-0+

Honestly, for what it does, I think it's a great application. It allows me to stream my music to my phone. That in and of itself is a great feature. Eventually, internal memory will become obsolete, and this will be the only/best option. http://www.androidvideoreview.net/ [...] eo-review/

dustykotatko 05/26/2011 6:36 PM
Hide
-0+

If anyone wants to get their hands on a free Google Music Beta invite, I found a site that was handing out from free. I thought it was too good to be true, until I found an invite sitting in my inbox 15 minutes later. :D

If you want to try getting your own invite, here's the link to the giveaway:

http://freemusicbetainvites.com.nu

dotaloc 07/08/2011 10:42 PM
Hide
-0+

anyone else noticed the streaming quality is bad. i noticed on one of my wife's songs, mostly...maybe it was a bad download or low quality original?