Gay Couple Uses Skype to Legally Marry in Texas
You've heard of a long distance relationship but what about a long distance marriage? And by marriage, we mean the ceremony, not the subsequent relationship.
We all know how useful Skype can be for maintaining relationships that otherwise wouldn't be possible. However, a couple in Texas took things to the next level by getting married over Skype. Though a Skype wedding is pretty remarkable in itself, there's something else extraordinary about this marriage ceremony: It is the first legal same-sex wedding in Texas.
Mark Reed and Dante Walkup had been together ten years when they decided it was high time they tied the knot. Unfortunately, though they wanted nothing more than to get married in their native Texas, theirs is a state that does not legally allow same-sex couples to marry. However, Reed and Walkup were not to be deterred and the two came up with a way to have a legal wedding without flying family and friends to another state.
Jay Morris writes that the couple traveled to Washington D.C. back in May to receive their certificate of marriage. Fast forward five months and the two were married in Texas, with a D.C. official (accompanied by several witnesses) marrying them via Skype.
Check out Mark and Dante's video below.
- The T-Shirt that Plays its own Music
- Mega Hurtz: Part Gun, Part Machine, All Cop
- Facebook to Build New $240 Million Data Center
- Phone Books Going Extinct, Finally
- Samsung's 4.5-inch Gingerbread Device to Hit '11
- The Flood of Nexus S Leaks Continues
- Microsoft's Kin One and Two are Coming Back
- It's an Awesome Analog Network Meter
- Future VW Cars to Have Ice/Fog Free Windshields
- Deals for November 15: The Deals are Back!
- Netflix on Select Android Phones in Early 2011
- Google Employee Offering Cash for Kinect Apps
- WP7 Makes Permanent Changes to microSD Card
- These are the Amazing Credit Cards of the Future
- Hands-on: Sennheiser Cans of the Dallas Mavs
- Google Serving Gingerbread Soon Says Schmidt
- Autodesk: You'll Be Making Movies on iPad Soon
- The Remote Control Throw-Pillow
- Facebook to Give Users @Facebook Email Address
Ummm.... uh...IDK. If I say anything, I will be marked down. Mark me down just because I'm Christian. This is completely wrong.
Not really sure what skype has to do with this, other than some people being able to watch them over the internet.
I wonder if I can legally marry my dog in Texas?
Ummm.... uh...IDK. If I say anything, I will be marked down. Mark me down just because I'm Christian. This is completely wrong.
Who cares what someone's religious values, or thoughts are on it - how about we talk about the tech behind it (hence it being a tech news site)
Ummm.... uh...IDK. If I say anything, I will be marked down. Mark me down just because I'm Christian. This is completely wrong.
i'm so sorry that you had to find out about this marriage. are you going to be ok? I don't see how you can possibly go on living knowing this happened. Hopefully one day they will ban this type of atrocity from happening!! I mean knowing that someone is married to someone else, but they have the same body parts... OMG THE APOCALYPSE IS HAPPENING!
Ummm.... uh...IDK. If I say anything, I will be marked down. Mark me down just because I'm Christian. This is completely wrong.
I have a hard time determining which is worse; your bigotry against gay marriage or your implication that all christians are equally bigoted.
Regardless, wish granted.
I say Congrats on good thinking. =3
That's pretty crazy.
Not fake, but still Gay
Ill say this.
Give technology enough time, and it will free the planet from its self imposed ignorance towards those different from ourselves.
I live in Dallas (with my wife and child), and i say, "Congratulations!"
Congrats gay dudes...TAKE THAT REDNECKS!!!! Unfortunately i still think its only a "legal marriage" in the state they were married in. My sister had to fly to New Hampshire when she tied the knot, and its only legal there.
eww..
Itis moral like this that brings our country down.
you're right... this country is heading into the toilet because we aren't enforcing YOUR beliefs on everybody... that makes sense. Who are you to tell others how to live their life? I'm not even gay but I'd gladly marry a man just to piss morons like you off
I think, in 30 years, it will be possible to marry a robot.
Just wonder, if Bible forbids marriage with robots.
They should call it something besides 'marriage' (maybe homosexual union or something of that nature), after all marriage is a religious ceremony and defined as such. Next thing you know, they are going to remove the anti-gay parts from the Bible
Can one really enforce their beliefs to someone else?
Would that even be legal?
Everyone has free speech, those who oppose or support or don't care or...take your pick
Anyway I was wondering if I could get married via Skype in USA/CA (she would be there)
while still living in Finland?
They should call it something besides 'marriage' (maybe homosexual union or something of that nature), after all marriage is a religious ceremony and defined as such. Next thing you know, they are going to remove the anti-gay parts from the Bible
They should call it something besides 'marriage' (maybe homosexual union or something of that nature), after all marriage is a religious ceremony and defined as such. Next thing you know, they are going to remove the anti-gay parts from the Bible
easiest and more sensible step would be to remove the bible.
It's pretty widely accepted by well... anyone other than Evangelical Literalists that Paul's letters to Rome, which are most often quoted when Christians argue homosexuality is a sin, were mostly against the Roman lifestyle at the time. It was full of hedonism and debauchery. It was a way to encourage Christians to lead a more virtuous lifestyle. Screwing everything with (and some things without) a heartbeat was just one of his (many) bullet points.
Marriage is for procreation, period.
Ah, the old gay marriage online debate.
I will send a cookie to anyone who can think of an argument that doesn't boil down to one of these:
-"I disagree with heterosexual marriage law."
-"My religion/acquaintance says that it's bad."
-"Eww, gross!"
They should call it something besides 'marriage' (maybe homosexual union or something of that nature), after all marriage is a religious ceremony and defined as such. Next thing you know, they are going to remove the anti-gay parts from the Bible
You do understand that there are no anti-gay statements in the bible. I'm serious. Those passages which are supposedly "anti-gay" in there are actually mis-translations and contextual in nature. I'm just saying, if you want to use the bible to defend your position, then make sure you educate yourself enough so that you don't come off as a mere sheep following the teachings of hateful and ignorant preachers and cultists (i.e. the pope and his fellow pedophiles).
I know what you guys think. I don't hate them for marrying, I hate the fact that they live a poor lifestyle.Hate the sin, love the person.
Well I hate you for being a pathetic excuse for a human being who relies on literature to rule their thoughts and emotions, go die in a fire.
I hope you're Catholic for ironies sake, priests after all have a GREAT reputation with minors and homosexual conduct.
Ah, a good example to start with:
Marriage is for procreation, period.
If marriage is only for procreation, then should we ban straight couples from getting married if one of the partners isn't capable of producing offspring? Should we jail heterosexual couples who don't have children within a certain number of years?
Basically, you're just disagreeing with current heterosexual marriage law in that it allows couples with no intention to procreate to marry. Also, you're missing the personal benefits of marriage as a commitment, as well as the financial and practical legal advantages.
I think it's great. I also don't understand why two people marrying is anyone else's business.
sinfulpotato - Marriage is for procreation, period.
Fine then. Have all of the heterosexual unions give up their tax, legal, and personal benefits. If you remove everything other than the titles of "Husband and Wife" from marriage, then I doubt gay and lesbian couples would care about the whole deal.
It's the fact that married couples get so many more tangible benefits other than just being able to procreate with one another (in a socially/religiously acceptable fashion anyway; it's not like people can't have sex without being married) that makes homosexual couples strive for equality. For example, if someone's SO is hospitalized and in a coma, but they only allow family to make a decision as for what's best for that person, that means the person that loves them the most cannot do anything for them because they were not allowed to marry. Instead their immediate family (which may not care for their lifestyle and be vindictive about it) are asked what to do instead. Can you honestly say that sounds right?
easiest and more sensible step would be to remove the bible.
A few billion people would disagree with you.
Ummm.... uh...IDK. If I say anything, I will be marked down. Mark me down just because I'm Christian. This is completely wrong.
I am Christian and I don't believe in gay marriage but 1) This is a technology forum 2) Not all Christians believe the same thing you do.
ok i got half way down, before i had to say something.
first off congrats, no one said "this is kind of gay"
second i believe all marriages shouldn't be a government institution. separation between church and state where.
You do understand that there are no anti-gay statements in the bible. I'm serious. Those passages which are supposedly "anti-gay" in there are actually mis-translations and contextual in nature. I'm just saying, if you want to use the bible to defend your position, then make sure you educate yourself enough so that you don't come off as a mere sheep following the teachings of hateful and ignorant preachers and cultists (i.e. the pope and his fellow pedophiles).
i love this, ,yea alot of the anti gay things are taken out of context, but there is one, dont remember the number, that is anti sodomy, which means any form of sex not to pro create. it basically says better to do a whore than to let the seed hit the ground. thats the only in context anti gay thing i believe is in there, the rest it twisted to be anti gay.
i love this, ,yea alot of the anti gay things are taken out of context, but there is one, dont remember the number, that is anti sodomy, which means any form of sex not to pro create. it basically says better to do a whore than to let the seed hit the ground. thats the only in context anti gay thing i believe is in there, the rest it twisted to be anti gay.
Um...you are referring to masturbation.
You do understand that there are no anti-gay statements in the bible. I'm serious. Those passages which are supposedly "anti-gay" in there are actually mis-translations and contextual in nature. I'm just saying, if you want to use the bible to defend your position, then make sure you educate yourself enough so that you don't come off as a mere sheep following the teachings of hateful and ignorant preachers and cultists (i.e. the pope and his fellow pedophiles).
I won't get into this debate, primarily because it's stupid. But this statement, debate or not, is just plain wrong. The translations of the bible are using the exact context that they were written in originally, and I can confirm that without a doubt. Source: I'm a semester and a couple weeks away from my masters in theology. (kinda my job to know this stuff)