Download the
Tom's Guide App from the AppsStore
News and trends on internet
/ mobile / "sound & picture" / IT
Yes No

Apple Patent Reveals Face Detection for iOS

- By - Source : Patently Apple

Apple may be looking to add facial recognition to iOS, indirectly backing up previous iTV reports that Apple wants users to be recognized across multiple devices.

As stated in previous reports, Apple insiders claim that the company wants iOS to recognize the end-user across multiple devices, whether its the iPhone or the current hot topic, Apple's alleged iTV. Now, on the heels of recent iTV reports, the US Patent & Trademark Office has conveniently published a patient application from Apple entitled "Low Threshold Face Recognition" which could allow the end-user to unlock an iOS device via facial recognition, even when it's in sleep mode.

According to the application diagrams, the face recognition system doesn't use correlation matching, but rather uses a weighted difference map. The system will reportedly first apply an orange-distance filter to determine variations in skin tone, and then determine the position of high-information areas like the eyes and mouth. It will then analyze the weighted differences between the normalized target face (image) and the normalized detected face (user). After that, both frames are compared on a whole. If successful, the security system will acknowledge the user and unlock the device. Throw in a possible voice recognition via Siri, and you have a two-way security measure that eliminates the need for the current Slide to Unlock and PIN features.

But this new system could do more than just unlock the device -- it could provide user customization. For example, specific settings could be loaded onto an iPad once the device detects a specific user, loading a special wallpaper, app arrangement, notification settings and more. What's more, it could be possible to lock media to a specific user's face, thus leading back to Apple's talks with media execs about recognizing the user across multiple devices. If the user's face is stored in the cloud, it may be possible that the user could share a movie with friends on their own iTV or iPad 2.

But as PatentlyApple points out, the feature is more or less bound to the user's device. "The methods disclosed in Apple's patent specification could adequately recognize a user associated with an iOS device without computing resources overhead that is characteristic of other face recognition techniques," the site reports. "Therefore, the face detection and recognition methods described in Apple's specification could be implemented in hardware, for example in graphical processing units (GPUs) of the iOS device. Apple clarifies that the new face detection and recognition system will apply to the iPhone, iPad, iPod touch and MacBook."

To learn more about Apple's new patent, head here.

Share:
33
Comments
X

Comments

Anonymous 12/30/2011 5:14 PM
Hide
-12+

Isn't Samsung doing the same thing?

thrasher32 12/30/2011 5:43 PM
Hide
-9+

I don't want Apple or anyone else storing my digital facial profile.

Also, how is "low threshold face recognition" secure? If I mock up a mannequin head with the same general features in the correct (or close-enough to pass) positions, or even hold up a photograph of my face, isn't that enough to get past the facial recognition system in a "low threshold" configuration?

Dantte 12/30/2011 5:56 PM
Hide
-17+

Android already has this, nice another legal battle.

Anonymous 12/30/2011 5:59 PM
Hide
-8+

How is this possible, isn't the new android doing the same? why can't they rape apple for this finally?

alyoshka 12/30/2011 6:00 PM
Hide
-3+

Nah, this is no battle, after 10 years they'll sue everyone using FR saying they invented it. Pretty simple foresight actually, since it's very cleverly labeled as low threshold, meaning the beginning or basic of FR tech of the future.

STravis 12/30/2011 6:15 PM
Hide
-2+

Is this an approved patent or a filed patent?

dheadley 12/30/2011 6:30 PM
Hide
-7+

The patent was applied for almost two years ago. It predates Androids use of this technology. On the other hand though PC's have done this for far longer than that.

makaveli316 12/30/2011 6:48 PM
Hide
-1+

same ol', same ol'....

Anonymous 12/30/2011 6:50 PM
Hide
-3+

people recognize each other all the time... I don't care if apple patents the technical methods, filters etc... to derive recognition. But if they think they can patent "recognition" itself then the patent system is truly broken.

Vladislaus 12/30/2011 6:52 PM
Hide
-2+

dheadley :
The patent was applied for almost two years ago. It predates Androids use of this technology. On the other hand though PC's have done this for far longer than that.


The Android face unlock was first shown in may 2011, and this patent was filled in June 2010. I wonder how much time was face unlock under development for Android. Also like you stated facial recognition isn't something new.

Dantte 12/30/2011 6:53 PM
Hide
-3+

dheadley :
The patent was applied for almost two years ago. It predates Androids use of this technology. On the other hand though PC's have done this for far longer than that.



Google Goggles was Google's test bed for FR and other recongzation, GG has been out for about 3 years now and pre-dates this patent.

greghome 12/30/2011 6:58 PM
Hide
-3+

Dantte :
Android already has this, nice another legal battle.




Lenovo's Thinkpads already have this....

BSMonitor 12/30/2011 8:31 PM
Hide
--2+

thrasher32 :
I don't want Apple or anyone else storing my digital facial profile.Also, how is "low threshold face recognition" secure? If I mock up a mannequin head with the same general features in the correct (or close-enough to pass) positions, or even hold up a photograph of my face, isn't that enough to get past the facial recognition system in a "low threshold" configuration?



Sigh.... As you probably have hundreds of pictures on mySpace or Facebook....

watcha 12/30/2011 8:46 PM
Hide
--1+

Vladislaus :
The Android face unlock was first shown in may 2011, and this patent was filled in June 2010. I wonder how much time was face unlock under development for Android. Also like you stated facial recognition isn't something new.



Irrelevant.

Prior art has to actually be art. Not just a claimed 'in progress' art.

watcha 12/30/2011 8:49 PM
Show
silver565 12/30/2011 8:50 PM
Hide
-3+

My dell laptop came with this feature 2 years ago....How the hell can they patent this?

watcha 12/30/2011 8:51 PM
Hide
--3+

thrasher32 :
I don't want Apple or anyone else storing my digital facial profile.Also, how is "low threshold face recognition" secure? If I mock up a mannequin head with the same general features in the correct (or close-enough to pass) positions, or even hold up a photograph of my face, isn't that enough to get past the facial recognition system in a "low threshold" configuration?



No it isn't enough.

Anonymous 12/30/2011 9:27 PM
Hide
-2+

This has been around forever on PC. If you google "face login webcamera" you can find a bunch of free applications to "unlock" or log you into your PC. Its been around for a really long time and even included as a standard feature in many of the major PC makers laptops / desktops.

watcha 12/30/2011 9:29 PM
Hide
--2+

bunmchole :
This has been around forever on PC. If you google "face login webcamera" you can find a bunch of free applications to "unlock" or log you into your PC. Its been around for a really long time and even included as a standard feature in many of the major PC makers laptops / desktops.



watcha :
To confuse this patent with facial recognition in general, as per 'Vladislaus', is to misunderstand what that patent is actually for.



house70 12/30/2011 10:21 PM
Hide
-0+

iOS trying to play "me too" with this, just like they did with the notification bar, multi-tasking and so on.
Next year they will "invent" widgets and after that power controls...

f-14 12/31/2011 2:37 AM
Hide
-1+

thrasher32 :
I don't want Apple or anyone else storing my digital facial profile.Also, how is "low threshold face recognition" secure? If I mock up a mannequin head with the same general features in the correct (or close-enough to pass) positions, or even hold up a photograph of my face, isn't that enough to get past the facial recognition system in a "low threshold" configuration?


too late law enforcement/FBI/DOJ, the DOD, the DOHS and the TSA most likely already have your face on file and has been using it since the 90's.
my question is who did apple steal the software recognition from?

Anonymous 12/31/2011 3:40 AM
Hide
-2+

This patent is not just about facial recognition, it is specifically about Apple's new method which requires significantly less processing than past methods and therefore has more uses such as devices in sleep mode.

watcha 12/31/2011 10:25 AM
Hide
--1+

house70 :
iOS trying to play "me too" with this, just like they did with the notification bar, multi-tasking and so on. Next year they will "invent" widgets and after that power controls...



Yeah, when a company patents a new and innovative method of delivering facial recognition without the processing overhead, and has a patent accepted (which cannot happen if the technology already exists in the public domain) - they are just playing 'me-too'.

Grow up, get a brain, and put your cloudy eyed anti-apple ridiculousness to one side and try actually reading what this patent is for.

You're the biggest anti-apple troll ever, and that would be fine if you used any semblance of logic.

Vladislaus 12/31/2011 1:00 PM
Hide
-1+

watcha :
Irrelevant.Prior art has to actually be art. Not just a claimed 'in progress' art.


Like the art from Apple and tons of other companies? File a patent and develop later, or let someone develop it an sue them to oblivion?

Vladislaus 12/31/2011 1:08 PM
Hide
-2+

watcha :
Was Google Goggles used to unlock smartphones?To confuse this patent with facial recognition in general, as per 'Vladislaus', is to misunderstand what that patent is actually for.


Is it any different than using facial recognition to unlock a computer? This is the problem with patents nowadays. The guys at the patent office don't have a minimum clue what's being approved, and tons of companies are taking advantage of it to stifle competition and muffle innovation. Also only the actual technology should be patented not the action. It's irrelevant if it's to unlock a phone a computer or whatever. Only the actual process of facial recognition should be patentable.

The patent law needs an urgent revision or the human race is better off without it.

watcha 01/01/2012 12:06 PM
Hide
--1+

Vladislaus :
Like the art from Apple and tons of other companies? File a patent and develop later, or let someone develop it an sue them to oblivion?



Sorry, where in this comment did you disprove that prior art has to be art?

To recap - you brought up the question of when Android STARTED developing Facial recognition. This is wrong for 2 reasons:

1 - Prior art is only prior art if it is publicly available. It wasn't, until Android released it.
2 - What is being patented here is a new and innovative method of facial recognition which requires less CPU power, not facial recognition itself. Did you even follow the link to the patent and read it?

Which is why your failure to understand has led you to blame the whole patent system (in your next comment, which is already covered by the above 2 points)....

The world would be a lot better if people actually understood what they were arguing against!

Anonymous 01/01/2012 2:58 PM
Hide
-0+

xbox kinect does this too. Way to patent existing tech... Patents are the devil.

subaru41 01/01/2012 3:52 PM
Hide
--1+

watcha :
Yeah, when a company patents a new and innovative method of delivering facial recognition without the processing overhead, and has a patent accepted (which cannot happen if the technology already exists in the public domain) - they are just playing 'me-too'.Grow up, get a brain, and put your cloudy eyed anti-apple ridiculousness to one side and try actually reading what this patent is for.You're the biggest anti-apple troll ever, and that would be fine if you used any semblance of logic.




Troll +6

Why don't you stop your cloudy eyed anti-android ridiculous trolling. You have 6 trolling comments alone in this thread.

watcha 01/01/2012 7:16 PM
Hide
-0+

subaru41 :
Troll +6Why don't you stop your cloudy eyed anti-android ridiculous trolling. You have 6 trolling comments alone in this thread.



And you presented .... how many? arguments against any of my FACTUAL statements?

Zero.

belardo 01/01/2012 8:05 PM
Hide
-0+

Around 2008~9, Lenovo iPad notebooks with Vista included facial log-on...

About the only thing that seems different with iOS is that its "automatic"....?

Also, such concepts have been in Scifi movies and TV for years.

watcha 01/01/2012 8:26 PM
Hide
-0+

belardo :
Around 2008~9, Lenovo iPad notebooks with Vista included facial log-on...About the only thing that seems different with iOS is that its "automatic"....?Also, such concepts have been in Scifi movies and TV for years.



The patent isn't for 'Facial log-on'.

So your comment seems like it's on the wrong article?

Seriously, guys, some basic brains please? This is NOT A PATENT FOR FACIAL RECOGNITION IN GENERAL.

Read that sentence a few times please and save the world from your uninformed drivel.