I ran 35 miles in the Asics Gel-Kayano 33 and it's comfortable and stable, but underwhelming

The Asics Gel-Kayano 33 is comfortable and stable, but lacks the fun factor

Asics Gel-Kayano 33
(Image credit: © Future)

Tom's Guide Verdict

The Asics Gel-Kayano 33 is a comfortable stability shoe that ticks off easy runs well, but it’s heavy and expensive, and I’m not convinced it’s an upgrade on the Gel-Kayano 32, which is available for less.

Pros

  • +

    Comfortable ride

  • +

    Stable design

  • +

    Built to last

Cons

  • -

    Heavy and lacks versatility

  • -

    Not a big upgrade on past models

Why you can trust Tom's Guide Our writers and editors spend hours analyzing and reviewing products, services, and apps to help find what's best for you. Find out more about how we test, analyze, and rate.

The Asics Gel-Kayano is one of the most popular and long-running stability shoe lines on the market, and even as a neutral runner I've enjoyed the past few models of the sneaker.

Asics has made some big changes to the latest model of the Kayano compared with the Asics Gel-Kayano 32, with a new midsole setup that aims to produce stability while allowing your foot to move naturally.

It’s a well-cushioned shoe and comfortable, if not the softest. It’s stable too, but I found the Asics Gel-Kayano 33 a little heavy on the run and the ride isn’t as smooth and fun as it is with the best running shoes I've tested.

Latest Videos From

It gets the job done for easy runs, but it’s expensive and lacks versatility, and there are some stability shoes I prefer like the Hoka Arahi 8. I think fans of the Kayano line might be best served by picking up the Gel-Kayano 32 on sale.

Asics Gel-Kayano 33 review: price and availability

Asics Gel-Kayano 33

(Image credit: Future)

The Asics Gel-Kayano 33 launched in June 2026 and costs $170 in the U.S., and £180 in the U.K., a high price but one that’s in line with other top stability shoes like the Nike Structure Plus and Saucony Hurricane 25.

Asics Gel-Kayano 33 review: design and fit

Asics Gel-Kayano 33

(Image credit: Future)

The Asics Gel-Kayano 33 is available in 10 colors for the men’s and women’s shoe, and there are wide and extra wide models available too. I tested the shoe in my normal size and had a good fit, with plenty of room around the toes and a secure hold around the heel and midfoot.

It’s a well-cushioned shoe and although Asics hasn’t confirmed the exact stack height of the Gel-Kayano 33, it’s around 40mm at the heel and has an 8mm drop.

My US men’s size 10 weighs 11.1oz, which is not unusually heavy for a cushioned stability shoe like this — it’s similar in weight to past Gel-Kayano models and the Nike Structure Plus — but it’s certainly not a lightweight option.

Upper

Asics Gel-Kayano 33

(Image credit: Future)

The Asics Gel-Kayano 33 has an engineered mesh upper with plentiful padding around the collar to increase its step-in comfort.

It’s a good upper that held my foot securely and comfortably during runs and while it’s not the most breathable around the back of the shoe — in hot conditions the padding absorbs a lot of sweat — it is lightweight and more breathable around the forefoot.

Midsole

Asics Gel-Kayano 33

(Image credit: Future)

The big changes to the Gel-Kayano 33 are found in the FluidSupport midsole, which uses two different foams as well as a small slab of PureGel under the heel.

It’s a dual-density setup with a softer top layer made from FF Blast Max foam and a firmer bottom layer made from FF Blast Plus foam.

This design should bring a combination of both spring and stability, with the latter aided by sidewalls of foam to cradle the foot. However, while I found the shoe stable, it didn’t deliver a lot of spring.

Outsole

Asics Gel-Kayano 33

(Image credit: Future)

Asics uses a mix of ASICSGRIP and AHARPLUS rubber on the bottom of the Gel-Kayano 33, which gripped well for me in wet conditions. The rubber feels firmer at the heel and I’d expect good durability from the outsole, with no signs of wear and tear so far.

Asics Gel-Kayano 33 review: Running performance

Asics Gel-Kayano 33

(Image credit: Future)

I did five runs in the Asics Gel-Kayano 33, with all of them done at a mostly easy pace, with some steady sections just to see how the shoe felt at anything faster than plodding pace.

The ride is steady, supportive and quite forgettable. I expected the new midsole to feel softer and bouncier than the Gel-Kayano 32, but the Gel-Kayano 33 is quite firm. The FF Blast Max foam, which has a bit of bounce when used in the Asics Novablast 5, has been dulled by the firmer bottom layer.

It’s comfortable and supportive — the redesigned midsole still delivers a stable ride, which is the main point of the Gel-Kayano 33 line — but I was hoping for a livelier ride, or at least a bigger change from the Gel-Kayano 32.

The Asics Gel-Kayano 33 still performs well as a protective stability shoe and holds its own against the competition in this part of the market, and I’m sure it will be very durable and good for walking as well as running, but it didn’t leave a lasting impression after my runs.

Should you buy the Asics Gel-Kayano 33?

Asics Gel-Kayano 33 and Asics Gel-Kayano 32

(Image credit: Future)

The Asics Gel-Kayano 33 is a reliable stability running shoe that will also be comfortable for long periods of standing and walking, but it doesn’t offer a better ride than its predecessor for me, and I’d look to pick up the Gel-Kayano 32 on sale instead.

Outside the Asics line-up, the Nike Structure Plus has a similar feel to the Kayano but a little more bounce from its midsole, while the Saucony Hurricane 25 is another stable option with a smoother ride feel, though it’s also pretty heavy.

The Hoka Arahi 8 is a lighter, smoother and less cushioned stability option that I prefer for daily training, and it’s also a bit cheaper, as is the Puma ForeverRun Nitro 2, which is another highly-cushioned stability shoe.

While I didn’t expect as soft and springy a ride from the Gel-Kayano 33 as you get from neutral sneakers, because it is designed to offer stability as a priority, I did hope the new midsole setup would create more of a difference to past models.

Nick Harris-Fry
Senior Writer

Nick Harris-Fry is an experienced health and fitness journalist, writing professionally since 2012. He spent nine years working on the Coach magazine and website before moving to the fitness team at Tom’s Guide in 2024. Nick is a keen runner and also the founder of YouTube channel The Run Testers, which specialises in reviewing running shoes, watches, headphones and other gear.

Nick ran his first marathon in 2016 and became obsessed with the sport. He now has PBs of 2hr 25min for the marathon and 15min 30sec for 5K. Nick is also a qualified Run Leader in the UK.

Nick is an established expert in the fitness area and along with writing for many publications, including Live Science, Expert Reviews, Wareable, Coach and Get Sweat Go, he has been quoted on The Guardian and The Independent.

You must confirm your public display name before commenting

Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.