CPU Performance With Non-wmmX-Optimized Application
Contents
- 1. The PDA Transformation: From Mobile Pocket Calendar To Multimedia Mobile Device
- 2. The 2700G Multimedia Accelerator
- 3. Benchmark Anomalies Due To Higher Resolutions And 2D/3D Graphics Accelerator
- 4. The X50v In Pictures
- 5. The X50v In Pictures, Continued
- 6. The X50v In Pictures, Continued
- 7. Axim X50v Features Table
- 8. 3D Graphics Performance
- 9. CPU Performance With Partially WmmX-Optimized Application: Sandra Pro (2004.8.9.131)
- 10. CPU Performance With Non-wmmX-Optimized Application
- 11. Battery Life
- 12. Conclusion: More Modern Than The X30i, But Not Perfect
10. CPU Performance With Non-wmmX-Optimized Application
A non-wMMX-optimized benchmark like the Pocket PC benchmark from our partner PC Professionell measures system performance with a fairly CPU-intensive standard application.

The top-end model in the X50 series does well here, too, thanks to its high maximum CPU speed.
2D Graphics Performance

The result here is not surprising, since this benchmark measures the bandwidth between the graphics memory and the CPU rather than actual graphics performance. The bandwidth is lower in a system with a dedicated graphics chip than in a PDA that relies on the CPU to process graphics data in addition to its other tasks. See "Benchmark Anomalies Due to Higher Resolutions and 2D/3D Graphics Accelerators", above, for a more detailed explanation of this phenomenon.
- Previous page CPU Performance With Partially...
- Next page Battery Life
VGA PDA: Dell Axim X50v : Read more
VGA PDA: Dell Axim X50v : Read more
VGA PDA: Dell Axim X50v : Read more
VGA PDA: Dell Axim X50v : Read more