Verizon: "Steve Jobs Has No Monopoly On Innovations"

By Christian Zibreg, published on July 1, 2008 at 9:40 PM
Source: Tom's Guide US | Keywords: , , | Themes: Smartphones
Syndication: Add to your Google homepage Add to My Yahoo!

Chicago (IL) - Verizon’s chief Ivan Seidenberg reveals interesting details about plans to leapfrog AT&T to become the largest wireless carrier in the US. In a rare interview with The Financial Times, Seidenberg commented on rumors that Verizon is up for a sale and fired a couple of jealous shots at Steve Jobs.

Verizon Ivan Seidenberg

With a market capitalization of $102 billion, Verizon Communication is the second US carrier and the fifth largest in the world. Company acquired the fifth-largest US wireless carrier Alltel this month in a deal worth $28.1 billion. Seidenberg claims that the resulting company is going to be bigger than the AT&T and that it will push Verizon to the top spot in the US mobile arena with 80 million customers. But some think telecom consolidation will eventually eat up Verizon, despite such an aggressive expansion. Seidenberg promptly dismissed the idea. "We’re not for sale. And in case you didn’t get that the first time, we’re not for sale. OK?" he told the reporter.

Mobile internet is the mobile operators’ Holy Grail

Although 80 percent of the US population now owns a mobile phone, Seidenberg says wireless carriers have discovered a new revenue stream in form of high-volume data traffic over the cell network for email and web surfing activities popularized by the ubiquitous iPhone. As more various devices with an emphasis on mobile internet come to the market and become popular, carriers will generate additional revenue by charging for data access.

Most US carriers today now charge $30 a month for an unlimited 3G data plan for PDAs and smartphones. Compared to the usual $20 a month for unlimited EDGE plan, carriers are now charging $10 premium for the same service on a faster network, justifying this with huge investment into 3G deployment. For instance, Verizon’s competitor AT&T will have invested more than $20 billion in network improvements and 3G upgrades between 2005 and 2008. AT&T is betting that iPhone 3G can increase its revenues with high-quality, data-centric customers.

Other carriers are frustrated because many lucrative customers have accepted the iPhone as the device of their choice. The fact that competitors have so far been unable to produce handset that will be equally accepted among users for mobile internet is actually postponing carrier’s plans to monetize on their 3G networks.

Verizon isn’t afraid of Google or Apple

These carriers are hoping that new breed of smartphones focused on mobile internet will increase their service revenues because more users will purchase data plans and Verizon’s chief is positive that his company is well positioned to grab a significant chunk of the mobile internet service revenues. Hopes of a proliferation of iPhone-like handsets this summer were dampened when it became clear that Android is facing unexpected technical difficulties and delays. This turn of events is forcing carriers such as Verizon to sit through this summer, perhaps even Christmas holiday season, and watch Apple winning consumers with the iPhone 3G.

Interestingly enough, Seidenberg isn’t afraid that in the future companies like Google may provide wireless internet services through WiMax, reducing traditional wireless carriers to infrastructure provider. He believes that the mobile phone is "the most disruptive thing in business," noting that mobile operators will soon become the primary beneficiary of today’s trend when more and more useful features become common on handsets, such as mobile internet, online banking, mobile gaming etc.

Verizon’s chief will wait for Steve Jobs to get old

Seidenberg was particularly vocal about the pressure coming out from Apple, the company credited for turning the mobile internet into a user-friendly feature. Seidenberg dismissed Apple, pointing out its small global handset market share, and saying he doesn’t believe AT&T subsidy will turn iPhone 3G into a mass-market hit, even at $199 price point.

Verizon’s chief also offered unique explanation on how he plans to fight off what seems to be an aggressive iPhone expansion both in terms of innovations and smartphone market share (Gartner has put Apple as third largest smartphone maker globally, and second largest in the US).

"Mr Jobs has no monopoly on innovation," says Seidenberg, suggesting that Steve Jobs "will eventually get old." However, Steve Jobs is already old and it’s arguable whether iPhone competitors will have an easier time when Jobs steps down.

This revealing interview underscores the fact that most analysts agree on: carriers and mobile phone makers who are trying to beat Apple at its own game will have a hard time knocking down the iPhone. Companies that compete with Apple first have to stop being obsessed with the iPhone to be able to come up with their own, innovative platform, ecosystem and eventually with a killer product. It’s true that innovation isn’t exclusive to Apple, but the problem for handset makers is that these days innovation mostly lives in Cupertino, California.

Comments | Print | Send to a friend
Slideshows related to this news

Google Ads

Comments

dragunover 07/02/2008 8:53 AM
Hide
-1+
dragunover
Uhhg,I hate Apple.Seems like Verizon is the main innovator pushing other companies to get off their bellies,eh?
randomizer 07/02/2008 10:36 AM
Hide
-0+
randomizer
"Steve Jobs is already old..."

Priceless :lol:
MDillenbeck 07/02/2008 2:32 AM
Hide
-0+
MDillenbeck
Verizon's innovative mobile broadband service - up to 5GB of data transfer... oh yeah, and don't forget that the terms of service explicitly state you can only use their service for internet browsing and email. Anything else could be a violation and could result in your account being canceled. Thus I find it interesting that they mention mobile gaming - I guess they mean only through their proprietary software you can download a limited selection of games to use.

Although sprint is now going to cap their service at 5GB per month also, at least they say you can do anything with that 5GB transference as long as it is legal.
nekatreven 07/03/2008 12:22 PM
Hide
-0+
nekatreven
Okay this apple fanboy crap is getting ridiculous. There are 4 or 5 apple articles on this site just today. Heres some news for you...I go to tomshardware (traditionally a PC hardware site) for PC news, not apple news, and I don't care.

"email and web surfing activities popularized by the ubiquitous iphone."?

The ubiquitous iphone? Are you effing KIDDING me? Ubiquitous means that something is EVERYWHERE. According to this article from your OWN company (http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/33663/145/)...in 2007, after the initial new sales push, the iphone had 2% of the US market and 1% of the global market.

THAT'S NOT UBIQUITOUS. And guess what else. NOT MUCH HAS CHANGED. I for one NEVER see the bloody things around.

"...the pressure coming out from Apple, the company credited for turning the mobile internet into a user-friendly feature."

According to WHO?!? I mean...are you stupid? Cause I'm pretty sure corporate blackberry users have had their email and the web for YEARS now...a market that apple has yet to do much for.

Its just wholesale, bandwagon, Jobs, propaganda crap. I mean the last line in the article says it all...and in an article that is supposed to be about verizon no less; I can only imagine what apple must be paying you.

A couple were okay, and maybe some people will find it interesting...but if you want to keep on putting 4 and 5 apple articles up per day, I will be happy to go read any of the other PC news sites. ...P.S. I didn't capitalize the 'p' in iphone and I don't care
randomizer 07/03/2008 2:08 AM
Hide
--1+
randomizer
Oh dear, now some idiots think THG is made up of Apple fanbois. First Nvidia, and now Apple. No wait, wasn't it Intel, then Nvidia, then Apple? Or is it still Nvidia, but not Intel, and now Apple? Make up your mind! :lol:
nekatreven 07/03/2008 2:48 AM
Hide
-0+
nekatreven
randomizer :
Oh dear, now some idiots think THG is made up of Apple fanbois. First Nvidia, and now Apple. No wait, wasn't it Intel, then Nvidia, then Apple? Or is it still Nvidia, but not Intel, and now Apple? Make up your mind!



Well I'm sorry if I got a little hot, but I'm no idiot.

As a matter of fact the accusation has been both Intel and Nvidia, although I was never one of the ones on that bandwagon. I'd say the accusation was most strongly placed on Intel during the rise and fall of the Athlon FX line...and I've heard noise about Nvidia just about every time the performance baton is passed. Like I said I've never really been with that group.

The difference, for one, is that all of the above are PC hardware. Thats what I've been reading here ever since some guy named tom actually had something to do with it. Before Bestofmedia bought it, and way before Omid bought it.

Back when K-6 chips got aftermarket overclocks and were resold underhandedly, which eventually caused the Athlon to have a locked multiplier late in the Athlon 2000 line (which held up until the recent black editions). Back when Athlons caught on fire, and when a P4 (northwood I believe) could be made to run 5ghz+ on nitrogen and phase change cooling. When you could make an XP run like an MP with a little tape and conductive laquer. I've been reading PC hardware here for a long time, and its getting further and further from that. Not to mention everyone's spell check seems to have broken.

Second, the article just doesn't make any sense. It calls a product 'ubiquitous' when it (even today, and even after the 3G launch) it only has a few percent market penetration. Less than 5% or even 10% is not ubiquitous, its just the iphone, strung out on crappy editorial sensationalism.

Whats worse is that the BlackBerry has existed for over a decade as a pager, and has been banging away at the mobile email market for 6+ years. YEARS. This article suggests that the iphone, barely a year old, is pioneering this market. Despite the fact that this 'pioneer' still has no replaceable battery, no keyboard, no MMS, no corporate support, and the limitations that go with being tied to an overly proprietary, overly priced manufacturer and carrier. (and no, the 3G version still does not fix all of the issues)

You can flame me and insult me if you want...but this is the internet...and its been done.

So either you or anyone else can make a counter argument to my claim that this article is full of misinformation and editorial sensationalism, or you can shove off.

Note You are going to post a comment as anonymous.



Google Ads