Doom 3
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Our Test And Comparison Systems, Continued
- 3. Detailed Configuration: Test And Comparison Systems
- 4. Pictures Of The Turion 64/Mobile Sempron Test System
- 5. Mobile Sempron Test System, Continued
- 6. Mobile Sempron Test System, Continued
- 7. Turion 64 And Centrino Notebook Cooling Systems Are Barely Different
- 8. Turion 64 Or Mobile Sempron: Which CPU For What Uses?
- 9. Representative Office Application
- 10. 3-D Game Play
- 11. A Warning To Upgraders: Careful When Upgrading The CPU!
- 12. Battery Tests
- 13. Battery Lifetime
- 14. Battery Charge Times
- 15. Doom 3
- 16. Unreal Tournament 2004
- 17. SiSoftware Sandra Pro (Synthetic Benchmark)
- 18. WinRAR (Data Compression)
- 19. Windows Media Encoder (Video Encoding And Processing)
- 20. Studio 9 Plus (Video Encoding And Processing)
- 21. Conclusion: Goals May Be Met, But There's Still Room For Improvement
15. Doom 3
Today, Doom 3 and Far Cry qualify as the most optically appealing 3-D shoot'em-ups. Just as Far Cry does, Doom 3 also works best with a fast graphics card and a fast CPU. Memory bandwidth has no measurable impact on these results. Obviously, the only thing that matters is the largest possible L2 cache.

Games Direct X9
Far Cry
As far as graphics quality goes, Far Cry is surely one of the most advanced 3-D shoot'em-ups. The price that this exacts from those who want the most out of this game is large outlays for the processor and graphics cards.
The AMD CPUs also scale in this test, depending on the size of their L2 caches and increases in memory bandwidth resulting from use of faster RAM. This avails them nothing, however, against the monster L2 cache in the Pentium M processor.

- Previous page Battery Charge Times
- Next page Unreal Tournament 2004





please try to keep the detail clear the pictures above are not explained clearly