Flying Car Takes Successful Flight

By Marcus Yam, published on March 19, 2009 at 6:20 PM
Source: Tom's Guide US | Keywords: , , , , | Themes: Business
Syndication: Add to your Google homepage Add to My Yahoo!

Ever since the invention of the automobile and airplane, there had to have been someone who figured combining both into one would be an amazing idea. After all, it didn’t take Back to the Future Part II to convince us that a flying (let alone time traveling) car would be ingenious.

Massachusetts-based aircraft company Terrafugia completed the first flight of its Transition Roadable Aircraft Proof of Concept or, in more straight forward terms, flying car.

The Transition is a two-seat, front wheel drive car that can reach highway speeds. A 30-second change is all that’s needed to go from plane to car. Both the wheels and the propeller are powered by an unleaded gasoline engine with a tank that’ll provide up to a 450 mile range at over 115 miles per hour.

“This breakthrough changes the world of personal mobility. Travel now becomes a hassle-free integrated land-air experience. It’s what aviation enthusiasts have been striving for since 1918,” says Carl Dietrich, CEO of Terrafugia.

While it’ll be some time before anyone will have a real flying car on the road, getting one in the air is a much closer reality. According to Terrafugia, the Transition is categorized as a Light Sport Aircraft, and requires a Sport Pilot license to fly--but the prototype will undergo additional advanced flight and drive testing before it’ll be ready for primetime.

There’s no official pricing just yet, but expect it to be just under the $200,000 mark. Terrafugia is now taking refundable deposits of $10,000.

For now, check out the videos links below for a look at the Transition in the air and on the road.

Comments | Print | Send to a friend
Slideshows related to this news

Sponsored links

Comments

Tekkamanraiden 03/20/2009 12:42 PM
Hide
-4+

Apparently this is what you get when you mate a Cessna with a VW bug.

megamike 03/20/2009 12:50 PM
Hide
-6+

I don't see these as a common, everyday use type of vehicle, just for LONG daily commutes, weekend getaways or other special long distance travel. And since the driver/pilot has to have a specific pilot's license, he'll have to file flight plans and follow all other aviation rules.

It sure looks like everything was thought through when designing this 'vehicle.' I especially like the fact that you can pull up to a regular gas station to fill it up! I LOVE it and I sure would like one, if I could afford the price tag! ;)

3 questions:
1> What's the 'on the road' mileage?
2> What's the size of the fuel tank?
3> Does it do aerobatics? ;)

davidpenman 03/20/2009 2:33 AM
Hide
-0+

Haha, the future is here! One small bump on the road and it would screw up the airplane part of it.

farfolomew 03/20/2009 2:34 AM
Hide
-3+

They mentioned this in Popular Science a year ago. It's not meant to be something you can transform at a whim and take off on a public road. That would be just silly, not to mention violate about every FAA rule out there.

It's meant to be used as something you can pull out of your Garage with, drive to the closest municipal airport, take off, land at yoru destination airport, then drive to wherever you need to go.

While the market for it will undoubtedly be small, I do think there still is one though.

LATTEH 03/20/2009 3:07 AM
Hide
-7+

i dont think i would want flying cars because the people cuting me off will be cuting me off at 10,000 feet

grimreality 03/20/2009 5:39 AM
Hide
-2+

Flying cars will never take off (pun intended) until they can maneuver like they can in Back to the Future II or the Fifth Element. At that point everybody would have to learn how to fly and new air traffic laws would need to be passed and hopefully we'll have some sort of autopilot system that can drive/fly better than we can.

MoUsE-WiZ 03/20/2009 6:28 AM
Hide
-0+

"While it’ll be some time before anyone will have a real flying car on the road"

I'm not sure that it's logically possible to have a flying car on the road.

shovel 03/20/2009 7:25 AM
Hide
-1+

These are cute ideas, but they will never take off!

Seriously - no way can avarage joe be trusted to fly a car - I see future road(& sky) travel as being completely controlled by computers/controllers. Automation is the only way average Joe is going to be able fly around in his car.

Hapcorrolr 03/20/2009 7:43 AM
Hide
-0+

Terrafuglia Transition?

cl_spdhax1 03/20/2009 8:25 AM
Hide
-1+

I want to see a cop chase me now!

alert101 03/20/2009 8:35 AM
Hide
-2+

Terrorist + bomb = scary
Terrorist + bomb + car = more scary
Terrorist + bomb + flying car = terrorist field day

Dmerc 03/20/2009 8:45 AM
Hide
-5+

Lets hope my company installs an air strip at the office so I could miss morning rush hour

Anonymous 03/20/2009 10:02 AM
Hide
-0+

For those who say it will never take off... you never know!

Look around, many things had become reality as technology advances, and we (or people in tha past) thought they were joke! This invention/evolution might not seem pratical today but we may look at it differently after a long improvement.

and about FAA, new rules must be in place, just like we keep updating every other rule. When cars invented 100 yrs ago, would anyone expect to see traffic light coming in our way? I'm sure that not just the new rules, vehicle sensors and controlling equips will be different requirement, too.

the movie Blade Runner is a more realistic example. It may not fly fast (to run very fast still in car mode) but it provides conveniences in 3D space living in a metropolis city. some criminals may take advantage of it, but so does the police cars.

eddieroolz 03/20/2009 10:42 AM
Hide
-2+

I don't think this would be too practical. How would you land it safely without the structured order that pilots face at the airpot?

Anonymous 03/20/2009 11:00 AM
Hide
-0+


and IMO, this does not replace regular cars and aircrafts:

- to go fast and long distance in the air, helicopters and airplanes are still the way to go in practice and best economy.

- car still the best option if we talking about simple maintenance, weight/towing capacity, and outside of city cars probably get speed and better MPG in most of the case.

afrobacon 03/20/2009 12:06 PM
Hide
-0+

Sure would help with the long trip to work every morning; as long as you don't get caught at least.

demonhorde665 03/20/2009 1:16 PM
Hide
--1+

i think the nay sayers are not seriously thinking about this ... granted note very one can get a pilot license .. but for teh record NON comerical adn NON militaryn pilot licenses DO NOT REQUIRE the eagle eyes or tehtechnicallknow how that the militarya dn comercial flying requires. you can get a personal flying license that allows you to A: fly yourself and or B: fly cargo , and these licenses don't have the requirements that a military or comercial pilot license requires.


given this fact i can easily see this becomignthe future perhaps not in my life time but some time down the road it WILL happen , in some form or another.

chunkymonster 03/20/2009 2:50 PM
Hide
-1+

I think flying cars with this foldable wing is hack 1950's retro order a model kit out of the back Popular Mechanics design. The Moller SkyCar is a much more elegant design and what a flying car should look like. If the laws allowed I would buy an M150 SkyCar today!

ProDigit80 03/20/2009 3:43 PM
Hide
-1+

I'm also concearned! With all these DUI drivers, what wreckage could they cause [strikethrough]driving[/strikethrough] flying a car into a house?

Also, a flat tire due to not maintaining a car is no big deal,as long as you're not driving on the highway@75mph or up! I can't begin to imagine a car with a wing breaking off.. or having a flat tire trying to land.

Accidents where now people can still survive, will they still @ 1000ft in the air?
Can you imagine tens of those vehicles flying above your head every day?
What if it gets into the hands of those johnny guys wanting to show off, throwing things out of their car for fun, and drive/fly recklessly?

I think it's a nice concept but never will get to the mass market.

Perhaps small villages and in airports, for those who are rich enough to afford one.

grieve 03/20/2009 3:45 PM
Hide
-0+

chunkymonster :
I think flying cars with this foldable wing is hack 1950's retro order a model kit out of the back Popular Mechanics design. The Moller SkyCar is a much more elegant design and what a flying car should look like. If the laws allowed I would buy an M150 SkyCar today!


I agree I’m not certain he has perfected the skycar just yet though. I watched an hour show on his design/building; it certainly is a superior design and use for a personal aircraft.

Grims 03/20/2009 3:53 PM
Hide
-0+

I can see it now, lights come on behind you and you realized you fell for the oldest speed trap in town...as the cop sees the wings go down and his prey fly off into the sunset...how fast is your radio now eh? haha.

ViPr 03/20/2009 4:01 PM
Hide
-2+

unfortunately, i believe, in car mode this vehicle does not have adequate side and rear visibility to be road permissable.

Anonymous 03/20/2009 6:06 PM
Hide
-0+

There is a reason Terrafugia calls this a "Roadable Aircraft" and not a flying car -- they are not marketing this as something that's going to replace people's day-to-day car. This is meant for pilots who are looking a means of transportation that gives them some added flexibility. farfolomew's example is one good one (park this in your garage, drive to airport, fly to destination airport, drive to final destination). Also, if the weather conditions do not allow flying (weather below IFR minimums, etc.), you still have the option of driving.

As for the Moller skycar... I've been following the "progress" of the skycar for over a decade. Personally, I feel the claimed performance/cost are extremely optimistic. They were talking about having imminent untethered flights of the M400 skycar prototype back in the early 2000's and now, last I looked, they basically pushed those back indefinitely. When I first heard about it, it sounded amazing and too good to be true... as usual, it seems that it was.

Comments are closed on this page.

Sponsored links