Source: Tom's Guide US | Keywords: ibuypower, gaming, pc | Themes: Desktop Computers, Digital Entertainment
8. Game Benchmarks


With no antialiassing enabled, the Dell with its GeForce 8800 GT has a sizable advantage until the 2048x1536 resolution, where the Radeon achieves virtual parity with the GeForce. Once we enable 4xAA and 8xAF, the Radeon flexes its muscles and the race is much closer, with the Radeon showing a bit of a lead at the higher resolutions. Surprisingly, the real-world gaming experience delivered by these two very different machines would be very close, if not indistinguishable.


With Quake 4, the frame rates are all so much higher than the 60-Hz refresh rate of most LCD monitors that it’s nearly irrelevant in a real-world situation. Once again we see the GeForce shows a theoretical advantage without AA, and the Radeon shows a theoretical advantage at extreme image-quality and resolution settings.


Serious Sam 2 only tells us the same story we’ve seen in Prey and Quake 4; the 8800 GT rules at low image quality settings, while the Radeon X2 rules at ultra-high settings and resolutions.


Supreme Commander surprised us; what is known as a game that takes good advantage of multithreading CPUs seemed to favor the Dell dual-core processor over the Phenom’s quad-core. Perhaps there are video driver factors also contributing to the results as Supreme Commander may favor the GeForce drivers.

The Warhammer Mark of Chaos benchmarks show us a very similar story compared to the Supreme Commander results. Once again, we have to wonder if these titles favor the GeForce drivers or architecture. We are working to clarify this issue and will report on it as soon as we have the answers.
- Previous page Productivity Benchmarks
- Next page Conclusion
Check out this test at behardware:
http://www.behardware.com/articles [...] hmark.html
1 core: 3.5 fps
2 cores: 6.6
3 cores: 12.9
4 cores: 13.1
The third core still doubled the FPS!
What are you talking about? To me it's pretty clear that the Dell outperformed the iBuyPower rig and in some cases by a far margin. Even at higher resultions where the ATI card is supposed the shine it's not like it beat down the Dell. One thing to keep in mind is that those who are looking for a low end gaming rig are not going to have 24"+ sized monitors to run the high resolutions that it would take to get performance better than the dell. Plus, the dell is cheaper.
I kind of think the conclusion here was really taking it easy on iBuyPower. Honestly they're going to have to work harder to come up with something that is truely competitve in the market.