Government Proposes That All Federal Arrestees Be Swabbed For DNA
Washington DC - Federal law enforcement agencies could be storing the DNA of all arrestees, according to a proposed rule. The Justice Department says arrestees would have their cheeks swabbed and the resulting DNA would be entered into a national DNA database. The rule has been published in the Federal Register and awaits a 30-day comment period.
Currently only convicted felons are swabbed by federal law enforcement agencies, but the new ruling would apply to all arrestees and all federal police agencies (and boy are there a bunch of them - from US Park Rangers to Postal Police). According to Justice Department stats, federal agencies arrest approximately 140,000 people a year. The proposed rule would also affect foreigners who are arrested.
The DNA results would be entered into the Combined DNA Index System or CODIS. The system combines samples from federal and state agencies. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, 44 states currently take DNA samples from convicted samples and 11 states authorize sampling from arrestees. Those include Alaska, Arizona, California, Kansas, Louisiana, Minnesota, New Mexico, North Dakota, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia.
According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the CODIS database has produced over 45,400 hits and helped in more than 46,000 investigations.
- Suspicions Soar About Mac Clone Maker PsyStar
- Apple's Market Value Greater Than Citigroup
- Apple, Sony Settle Suit Over Battery Fire
- Asustek Announces Second-gen Eee PC
- Intel Takes Aim At AMD's Cash Cow
- AMD Expected To Cut 510-850 Jobs This Thursday
- VoIP On iPhone Using EDGE Now Possible
- Microsoft Completes Danger Acquisition
- Asus Launches 1TB Laptop
- Finetech Japan 2008: Sony Wants To Outpace LCD TV Market Growth
- IBM Q1 Profit Jumps 26%
- Fring VoIP For The IPhone: Why Should You Care?
- European Union Clears Activision-Blizzard Merger As Industry Awaits Its New King
- Yahoo And Google To Move Ahead On Partnership
- Apple Grows To Over 6% Market Share
- STEC Rebuffs Seagate's Patent Suit, Vows Fight To The Death
- The Changing Face Of Low-Cost Notebooks: No Longer Big And Clunky
- PayPal To Block Browsers Without Extended Validation SSL
- Red Hat Nixes Desktop Plans, Cites Microsoft's Dominance
Personally, I don't like this. When a person has been convicted of a crime, I think it is okay to take their DNA and put it in a database, but then only if they are convicted of forcible rape... anything else, no, I don't think it should go into any government database.
Personally, I don't like this. When a person has been convicted of a crime, I think it is okay to take their DNA and put it in a database, but then only if they are convicted of forcible rape... anything else, no, I don't think it should go into any government database.