SiSoft Sandra 2002 Benchmarks: CPU, Multimedia And Memory, Continued
Source: Tom's Guide US | Keywords: business, notebook, with, centrino, mobile, technology
- 1. Using 1.5 GHz Pentium M Instead Of 1.6 GHz Pentium M: A Dollars-and-Cents Decision
- 2. Powergear: Power Management By Asus
- 3. Setup
- 4. The M2N In Pictures
- 5. The M2N In Pictures, Continued
- 6. Benchmarks Under Windows XP
- 7. Synthetic Benchmarks
- 8. SiSoft Sandra 2002 Benchmarks: CPU, Multimedia And Memory, Continued
- 9. SiSoft Sandra 2002 Benchmarks: CPU, Multimedia And Memory, Continued
9. SiSoft Sandra 2002 Benchmarks: CPU, Multimedia And Memory, Continued

The two machines remain neck-and-neck in memory bandwidth. Normally, you would expect the score to be close to the theoretical upper limit for memory bandwidth of 2,100 megaBytes/s (DDR2100 RAM). The real value is 1,700 MB/s, however, because both devices rely on the shared-memory architecture for their graphics RAM.
Since the graphics card shares the memory bandwidth, there isn't much left over for the processor. We ran a control test with a low monitor resolution and reduced color depth, which only confirmed this fact. Measurements taken with an SVGA resolution are around 1,800 MB/s. Ramping down the color depth from "True Color" to "High Color" increases memory bandwidth by another 100 MB/s.

In keeping with the Windows power-scheme strategies , using the "Max battery" or "Presentation" power schemes will throttle down the CPU speed and, by extension, the memory bandwidth of both machines.
- Previous page SiSoft Sandra 2002 Benchmarks: CPU,...
- Next page Multimedia Performance: PC Mark 2002