Support for Win 2K, XP SP2 ends July 2010

2:40 PM - December 8, 2009 - By Kevin Parrish - Source : Tom's Guide US

Still using Windows 2000 or Windows XP SP2? Microsoft is pulling the plug on support for these products in July 2010.

On Sunday Microsoft updated the Windows Blog with the sad reminder that official support for Windows 2000 Server, Windows 2000 Client, and Windows XP SP2 will be severed on July 13, 2010. Naturally, Microsoft provides the reminder as a push to get consumers to spend buckets of money on Windows 7, Windows Server 2008 (R2) and more.

Microsoft's gloomy reminder also revealed that consumers still thriving on the legacy operating systems (2K, XP SP2) won't be able to migrate to Windows 7 using the User State Migration Tool. In fact, consumers will need to upgrade to Windows Vista (the blog said XP but that didn't make any sense), and then migrate to Windows 7.

But for consumers stubborn enough to remain in Windows 2K and XP SP2, Microsoft will not provide security updates or assisted support after the July 2010 date. Resistance may eventually lead to security risks, as attackers will target hesitant consumers through un-patched exploits. While upgrading is annoying and costly, residing in legacy operating systems may be even more costly in the end.

Still, for XP lovers, hope is not all lost: the latest service pack, SP3, is still an option in holding off on the Windows 7 upgrade. This in fact will keep support alive for up to two years after the next service pack release (if there is one, which is unlikely).

Ars Technica expands the report even further, indicating that support for Windows Server 2003 and Windows Server 2003 R2 will end on July 14, 2015.

Get more tech and gaming news by hitting me up on Twitter here.

Comments

Read the comments on the forums
xaira 12/09/2009 12:22 PM
Hide
-4+

ill just keep rockin sp3

jhansonxi 12/09/2009 12:28 PM
Hide
--1+

Hard to believe but I still encounter companies running web servers on Win2K. I don't know if it is management ignorance or just lack of IT staff to replace it.

techguy378 12/09/2009 12:44 PM
Show
Gin Fushicho 12/09/2009 12:47 PM
Hide
-3+

Push everyone to Windows 7 , it is superior. =3

Honis 12/09/2009 12:55 PM
Hide
-13+

techguy378 :
I hope XP users do get viruses. They've had ample time to upgrade to Windows Vista. There are no excuses for still using XP. Microsoft should have discontinued support for XP a long time ago.

I hope you're just trolling...

Doesn't win2k still have fewer exploits than XP and Vista?

jhansonxi :
Hard to believe but I still encounter companies running web servers on Win2K. I don't know if it is management ignorance or just lack of IT staff to replace it.

The motto in a profitable company is, "If it isn't broken, still works, and isn't costing us in overhead, don't change it." I use the word "works" loosely.

Bolbi 12/09/2009 12:56 PM
Show
Bolbi 12/09/2009 12:57 PM
Show
FoShizzleDizzle 12/09/2009 12:58 PM
Hide
-13+

techguy378 :
I hope XP users do get viruses. They've had ample time to upgrade to Windows Vista. There are no excuses for still using XP. Microsoft should have discontinued support for XP a long time ago.


Your foolishness lies in viewing 'ample time' to be synonymous with 'ample reasons'.

Upendra09 12/09/2009 1:01 AM
Hide
--1+

I am still running XP on an old desktop and Vista Premium on a HP laptop

i still like XP and don't see much of a difference between Vista and XP, in fact my faster HP laptop takes just the smae mount of time to boot up as the 1.2 ghz tualatin Celeron, so it shows how bloated the OS is

i plan on building a new tower and going directly to 7

The Schnoz 12/09/2009 1:35 AM
Hide
-3+

Why would anyone not want to upgrade to Windows 7 from XP. If you want DirectX 11, Trim for SSDs, better security, cleaner interface, better multi-core support, more stable kernel, XP Virtualization, etc. People swearing dedication remind me of those old timers that won't leave their home when their warned to evacuate for a flood.

pbrigido 12/09/2009 1:48 AM
Hide
-1+

Considering the software is now 10 years old, that is not a bad thing. Besides, it's not like XP is going to all of a sudden stop working. It just won't have any support. After 10 years anyways, if someone still needs support for XP, they may want to consider retiring from computers all together.

flaminggerbil 12/09/2009 2:05 AM
Hide
-0+

Glad I got a cheap pre-order Win7, was well worth the money.

longerlife 12/09/2009 2:35 AM
Hide
-3+

Are MS really supposed to continue supporting software they will no longer sell and have superseded (twice) forever...

By all means use XP if you want, but it was never sold as software with a lifetime of free updates.

Really simple, official support is ending, if that support is important to you, you will need to update, if not, don't worry about it and carry on...

This move is squarely aimed at businesses to give them a kick up the butt and get them to update their tired IT infrastructures.

Hopefully it will give an added boost to hardware manufacturers and the IT industry at large, which lets face it we all love...

It probably won't do the global economy too much harm either, (and yes it will directly increase Microsoft's profits too).

belardo 12/09/2009 2:48 AM
Hide
--3+

How many PEOPLE actually call microsoft for support? End users who buy HPaq/Dells contact Dell. Those who build our own PCs, don't need MS and theres a huge data base of tech info and forum boards with XP info.

But downgrading XP to vista to upgrade to Win7 is stupid. Win7 can be used to install on an XP box, but it'll wipe the drive... which should be done anyway for any major OS change.

ProDigit80 12/09/2009 3:06 AM
Hide
-5+

Gin Fushicho :
Push everyone to Windows 7 , it is superior. =3


Not in every aspect!
For audio and video engineers, XP and Windows 98se where the best tools on the market (with an ASIO driver).

The problems with bigger and heavier OS'es is that you have increased latencies for audio and in video. In order to synchronize audio and video is particular CPU intensive, and the switch from XP to Windows 7 takes several milliseconds tol on latency!

For live synthesizer or musicians, anything beyond 12ms (or about 256 samples at 44,1kHz) is noticeable (much like LCD's with latencies of tens of ms of delay is noticable for experienced gamers).
I'm convinced that unless MS is going to refocus on creating a platform that has a better solution than XP, most audio and video engineers will continue to use XP for perhaps many more years!
And especially audio engineers,since Windows 7 offers no benefit whatsoever over XP on audio field.
Video only if you're using DX11 effects within a clip.

ProDigit80 12/09/2009 3:10 AM
Hide
-2+

Ow,and also, one word where XP beats windows 7:
netbooks!

It is also a BIG market.
I think MS needs to refocus on getting an ultra light OS, that is fast, compatible, and is Windows; and save the eyecandy,and total compatibility and automatic background activity for it's regular end users.

mlopinto2k1 12/09/2009 3:14 AM
Show
Shadow703793 12/09/2009 3:16 AM
Hide
-4+

RIP Windows 2000. It was great knowing you.

techguy378 12/09/2009 3:23 AM
Hide
-0+

FoShizzleDizzle :
Your foolishness lies in viewing 'ample time' to be synonymous with 'ample reasons'.


There are plenty of reasons like fewer crashes and better security. Things like audio and video should not has direct access to hardware except in cases where Microsoft says it is ok. There will be fewer security issues this way.

Anonymous 12/09/2009 3:39 AM
Hide
--1+

Wow... MS is trying to make money by forcing people to get rid of their NINE YEAR OLD OS!!! God forbid!!

JofaMang 12/09/2009 4:18 AM
Hide
-1+

Xp64 SP2 is probably included in that factoid (and no sp3 will be released)

techguy378 12/09/2009 5:21 AM
Hide
--1+

JofaMang :
Xp64 SP2 is probably included in that factoid (and no sp3 will be released)


Hardware support for 64-bit XP has been discontinued from most major hardware manufacturers.

Gin Fushicho 12/09/2009 6:30 AM
Hide
-0+

ProDigit80 :
Ow,and also, one word where XP beats windows 7:netbooks!It is also a BIG market.I think MS needs to refocus on getting an ultra light OS, that is fast, compatible, and is Windows; and save the eyecandy,and total compatibility and automatic background activity for it's regular end users.



I will agree with you on that 100% , as for the music and Graphics ... get a solid state drive and more RAM. and get a decent video card like an 8600GT. That'll solve the problems.

False_Dmitry_II 12/09/2009 6:40 AM
Hide
-0+

I'm sure the majority of users could just run linux instead. Especially if they're still running windows 2000 they probably don't use anything other than internet email and office.

cj_online 12/09/2009 7:15 AM
Hide
--2+

Finally !! i hate fkn XP...
Vista sucked too, but Windows 7 pwns...

Anonymous 12/09/2009 8:02 AM
Hide
-0+

I have dumped XP day 1 VISTA was released. And never looked back. There was some frustration with VISTA initially mainly due to lack of Creative drivers. But for Win7 , i haven't encounter any lack of drivers issue so far.

XP beats WIN 7 on netbook? I don't think so. Win 7 just runs fine on my ATOM desktop(which is no faster than most ATOM netbook). Even with Aero on.

ProDigit: And yeah, like there's 100 million musicians out there who cares about 12ms latency?? Most of us don't give a freak. No disrespect, i play guitar and keyboard myself (but i'm not a pro).

You can't satisfy everyone with a single product, but Win7 has a boat load of more pros than cons which only certain people are affected.

The problem with people sulking here i see is some people expecting a Porsche engine to runs smoothly in a mini cooper. If you're running on netbook or old and slow machine. Why do u even bother to upgrade? New OS is not meant for your hardware. You should stick to XP or Win98(if have even older machines).

Go Win7 Go!!!

Hellboy 12/09/2009 9:12 AM
Hide
-0+

yeah vista us a bit doggy but it is not as bad as everyone says.

you wait until you try some netgear wireless adaptors on windows 7 and then youll see what i mean.. There is still alot of hardware which require drivers that are not available.

Long live Win 2k.. Loved that OS. XP time has just now come. Windows 7 will soon be on everyones pc.

Saying that i have had issues with 7. Creative really need to remove their finger from their A$$ and produce some drivers which work, its almost like they want to destroy them selves... Any one who wants a XIFI - dont do it- for an extra fps the agro is not worth it. Itunes in windows 7 lost sound - which never happend in Vista.

mitch_74 12/09/2009 11:40 AM
Hide
-0+

hmm so there stopping updates for win xp well i think that someone should tell them to stop selling it then or are thay going to sell it untill July 13, 2010 my friend has just got xp because his comp wont run vista (old comp)he will do his nut when he reads this

belardo 12/09/2009 12:18 PM
Hide
-1+

NO...

Microsoft will no longer support Windows XP SP2. IE: If you friend has a problems with Windows XP with SP1 or SP2, they will not help him when he calls Microsoft directly. If he installs SP3, then they'll be happy to talk to him.

MS will continue to release security patches, which is ALL that they do since around SP3. What else does WinXP need?

Summer 2014, Microsoft will END any additional updates for WinXP.

What does that mean? Well, you can re-install XP, download all the patches. Up until that cut off date. No more "updates". Microsoft may (can) shut down servers for XP, but that would be a bad thing to do... but who knows.

With Windows98 as of now for example. Microsoft says they are not providing anything for Windows98. http://support.microsoft.com/ph/1139

So there is a chance, in 4 years (1~2 years after Windows 8 is released) - that ALL Windows XP support (other than knowledge base) is dead. That should be WRONG - because people will still need to Activate the OS after a re-install on legit systems.

marsax73 12/09/2009 2:19 PM
Hide
-1+

ProDigit80 :
Not in every aspect!For audio and video engineers, XP and Windows 98se where the best tools on the market (with an ASIO driver).The problems with bigger and heavier OS'es is that you have increased latencies for audio and in video. In order to synchronize audio and video is particular CPU intensive, and the switch from XP to Windows 7 takes several milliseconds tol on latency!For live synthesizer or musicians, anything beyond 12ms (or about 256 samples at 44,1kHz) is noticeable (much like LCD's with latencies of tens of ms of delay is noticable for experienced gamers).I'm convinced that unless MS is going to refocus on creating a platform that has a better solution than XP, most audio and video engineers will continue to use XP for perhaps many more years!And especially audio engineers,since Windows 7 offers no benefit whatsoever over XP on audio field.Video only if you're using DX11 effects within a clip.



I agree with you there. Running Cubase and Reaper. XP has a small memory footprint allowing me to utilize the remaining memory for my software synths and plugin effects. I tried it on Vista and the latency was way out of control.

TommySch 12/09/2009 2:50 PM
Hide
--2+

marsax73 :
I agree with you there. Running Cubase and Reaper. XP has a small memory footprint allowing me to utilize the remaining memory for my software synths and plugin effects. I tried it on Vista and the latency was way out of control.



You should try DOS, it has a much smaller footprint and uses less CPU resources at the same time. I bet my video card has more RAM then your whole PC. Plz ditch your 486DXII.


Comments are closed on this page.
Ads
Ads