Valve Responds to Left 4 Dead 2 Ban

By Kevin Parrish, published on September 18, 2009 at 6:00 PM
Source: Tom's Guide US | Keywords: , , , , | Themes: Software, Digital Entertainment
Syndication: Add to your Google homepage Add to My Yahoo!

Valve wasn't too happy about Australia banning L4D2.

Yesterday News.com.au reported that the Australian Classifications Board refused to classify Valve Software's upcoming game, Left 4 Dead 2, thus banning the game from retail shelves in that country. The Board refused the game based on its "realistic, frenetic and unrelenting violence," a feature many FPS games of late actually share.

According to the Board's report, the game contains high-impact violence and is thus deemed unsuitable for gamers less than 18 years to play. As it stands in Australia, there are no adult ratings for video games, so anything that fails to meet the criteria for MA15+ is refused classification. Although one of the Board members disagreed with the decision, the majority ruled that the game was just too violent.

Upon hearing the news regarding the Board's decision, Valve Software's VP of marketing Doug Lombardi said that the entire staff was disappointed. "We were surprised to hear of this news yesterday," he told Shacknews. "Obviously, everyone at Valve is pretty bummed. It would be a shame if folks in Australia, or anywhere else, are unable to purchase Left 4 Dead 2 because of a ratings issue."

Left 4 Dead 2 is still on track for a November 17 ship date here in North America, heading to the PC and Xbox 360.

Comments | Print | Send to a friend

Sponsored links

Comments

pcrayz 09/19/2009 12:07 PM
Hide
-20+

A baby called, it wants its cry back. Harden the fuck up Australia!

chaohsiangchen 09/19/2009 12:09 PM
Hide
-0+

That's why government-rating agency is a bad idea. They can really be PITA to sound business and meddling with other people's affair with their own narrow minded moral standard.

rooket 09/19/2009 12:11 PM
Hide
-5+

I thought l4d 2 was just l4d 1 with new levels.. dunno what the big deal is although a ton of 12 year olds do play l4d and i guess that can be considered disturbing to some.

frozenlead 09/19/2009 12:13 PM
Hide
-20+

This should be a parental decision.

shadowplayer51 09/19/2009 12:16 PM
Hide
-20+

The Board refused the game based on its "realistic, frenetic and unrelenting violence,"

We all know how realistic killing zombies is

False_Dmitry_II 09/19/2009 12:17 PM
Hide
-13+

It does seem odd that apparently L4D 1 wasn't a problem but this one is...
They really should add adult ratings.

djcoolmasterx 09/19/2009 12:23 PM
Hide
-2+

Crimethink.

bogcotton 09/19/2009 12:40 PM
Hide
-4+

Funny how they don't have the same attitude toward movies...

lemonade4 09/19/2009 12:41 PM
Hide
-0+

why can't they buy LFD2 off steam? is it just a banning of retail copies from being sold?

doomtomb 09/19/2009 12:47 PM
Hide
-3+

"realistic, frenetic and unrelenting violence"

how many FPS games can you think of that don't actually fit this description?

Anonymous 09/19/2009 12:49 PM
Hide
-0+

pcrayz wrote:
"A baby called, it wants its cry back."

What was that? You must be taking notes from George Costanza ¬_¬

jediagh 09/19/2009 12:54 PM
Hide
-3+

L4D2 retail price $50 USD.
L4D2 eBay price so Austialian can get it $200 USD.
The "blackmarket" is going to love L4D2. It's going to bring in a boatload of money for them getting it to Australia.

jediagh 09/19/2009 12:55 PM
Hide
-0+

Note pricing above is just an example.

D_Kuhn 09/19/2009 12:57 PM
Hide
-1+

All that means is that it'll sell twice as fast as it would have in Australia... just not through the retail channel.

Free publicity for Valve, and now every Aussie kid will want it twice as much.

r1master 09/19/2009 1:03 AM
Show
unlicensedhitman 09/19/2009 1:14 AM
Hide
-0+

They can always download the game from steam or have one of family members who lives outside of Austrila and gift it to the user.

tacoslave 09/19/2009 1:32 AM
Hide
-1+

Left 4 Dead 2, thus banning the game from retail shelves in that country. The Board refused the game based on its "realistic, frenetic and unrelenting violence,"

oh they must mean because they're black zombies and we all no how those black Australians get...

pcrayz 09/19/2009 1:44 AM
Hide
-0+

r1master :
pcrayz - Watch you mouth.This is not "Australias" fault... It the stupid ass governing body that wont put in a 18+ rating... HOW HARD CAN IT BE TO DO THAT YOU IDIOTS ! ! ! If there isnt a rating, and is need for one... MAKE ONE !You should make generalisations like you did, makes you look ignorant.



No shit Sherlock, it's a joke.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mh6pZQX22CQ

demonhorde665 09/19/2009 1:59 AM
Hide
-0+

shadowplayer51 :
The Board refused the game based on its "realistic, frenetic and unrelenting violence,"We all know how realistic killing zombies is




LOL what the fuck you mean?? !!!

suppose i cant take my zombie slave / shooting pratice subjects with em when i got on vacation next summer.. i suppose i coudl jsut take em adn let em run free in australia so they can eat idiots taht come up with this crap


but serious ! damn how do aussies live when they don't allow thier citiezens to shoot thier zombie's !!!

i shoot mine all teh time , hell had to shoot roten rhonda jsut teh otehr day when she bit the dog

demonhorde665 09/19/2009 2:03 AM
Hide
-1+

r1master :
pcrayz - Watch you mouth.This is not "Australias" fault... It the stupid ass governing body that wont put in a 18+ rating... HOW HARD CAN IT BE TO DO THAT YOU IDIOTS ! ! ! If there isnt a rating, and is need for one... MAKE ONE !You should make generalisations like you did, makes you look ignorant.




actrually i thought his joke was funy , so far you'reteh only oen looking liek an idiot here , sicne his statment was opbviously an joke , it can easily be determined that he doesn't think ALL ausiis are at fualt ... pffft lol idiot LOL

kami3k 09/19/2009 2:59 AM
Hide
-1+

demonhorde665 :
actrually i thought his joke was funy , so far you'reteh only oen looking liek an idiot here , sicne his statment was opbviously an joke , it can easily be determined that he doesn't think ALL ausiis are at fualt ... pffft lol idiot LOL




Omfg, I don't think I've seen the English language so butchered before. Please, learn how to write/type.

maddad 09/19/2009 3:00 AM
Hide
-0+

No more comic books or Batman movies for Australia. Just too darn violent.

kami3k 09/19/2009 3:02 AM
Hide
-0+

Also I think they Aussies will not be able to get it through steam either. Steam will know where you actually are and will just block you from purchasing it.

coolronz 09/19/2009 3:29 AM
Hide
-0+

nah as always, they will beable to play it, just not online mutli-player... sad fact... but seriously, maybe this decision will be overturned by the time its released anyways....:)

eklipz330 09/19/2009 3:56 AM
Hide
--3+

wtf is an australia?

i love my own world here in new york.

CoryInJapan 09/19/2009 4:20 AM
Hide
-1+

WTF is a new york?
I love my little own world here in Dank counrty California.XD

Anyways sorry my aussy friends from down there.I will gladly play it in your honor.

ALso maybe it isnt that its so hard to put in and 18+ rating.Maybe they are just moraly deciding that if a game is to narly for they standard 15+ then its to narly a gamr for kids to play..Which they still think Video/Pc games are still only for kids.

blueyubs 09/19/2009 4:24 AM
Hide
-3+

Australia Can't get an 18+ rating because of one person "South Australian Attorney-General and Minister for Justice and Multicultural Affairs, Michael Atkinson". Australia's gamers are held at ransom by ONE persons. To make things worse 99% of Australia can't vote him out, never voted him in because you have to live in his District. So we are totally powerless. Got to love people who force THEIR religious point of views on others.

yang 09/19/2009 5:10 AM
Hide
-0+

now everybody from australia will just import the game from other countries and thus damaging it's own economy. Nice going AU goverment

christop 09/19/2009 5:12 AM
Hide
--2+

Who cares.....

TidalWaveOne 09/19/2009 6:19 AM
Hide
--3+

Great! Would like to see more crap banned.

pocketdrummer 09/19/2009 6:52 AM
Hide
-0+

Why are organizations formed to just stick their mitts in every aspect of our lives? Seriously, there are organizations here that, due to their involvement with Splenda, won't allow Stevia to be labeled as a sugar alternative (has to be a "dietary suppliment"). How much sense does THAT make?

Ratings are nearly useless and, by definition, prone to human error. To assume that one's standards apply to all others is, at best, idiotic.


Sponsored links