Source: Tom's Guide US | Keywords: vuze, cox, p2p, traffic | Themes: The Internet, Networking
Vuze is at it again it appears--this time going after Cox Cable, seeking an FCC Probe into the way that Cox manages customer bandwidth.
Vuze, the media company that some of you may remember going after Comcast’s peer-to-peer throttling practices is now targeting Cox Cable. Cox apparently made themselves a prime target for Vuze with their announcement in late January over how they will classify P2P traffic as being “tolerant of delay”.
Jay Monahan, attorney for Vuze, speaks out on his blog, saying:
“That (P2P Traffic) includes all bittorrent applications, including our Vuze application. We take that personally, and think you should too. While Cox may consider our content and business to be unimportant or of lower priority, all of the content we deliver through the Vuze HD Network is delivered using our bittorrent-protocol-based technology. Suffice it to say, our 10 million users who access over a petabyte of Vuze HD Network content every month care about ‘delay’ of their content.”
This is obviously the first and foremost reason that Vuze is taking all of this traffic management stuff seriously, as the way it deliver its content appears to fall directly into the criteria for ‘tolerant of delay’ traffic as set forth by Cox Cable. However, Cox has not yet put this new practice into full effect everywhere as of current. According to Cox, it's just ‘testing’ these methods starting this month.
Applications that are classified as ‘tolerant of delay’ will also include FTP, Usenet, and Software Updates. When Cox’s network becomes saturated with traffic the new management technology will give priority to 'more important traffic' such as the obvious Web browsing and traffic like voice calls, streaming videos and on-line gaming.
“Although Cox is investing a significant amount of time and money to test this new method of congestion management, we won’t know if changes are warranted until the results of this trial are complete.” – Cox Cable added.
Vuze says that the troubling aspect of this investigation is that unlike Comcast, Cox will not just be measuring congestion, it will be putting focus on specific applications. Vuze expresses that it's are not very reassured by Cox’s insistence that delays will be “very brief and likely not noticeable to customers.”
-
Previous News Article
Palm Pre Targeted to Hit Sprint... -
Next News Article
Apple Stores Blocking Facebook
10 photos
10 photos
10 photos
10 photos







This would be like the gas company telling you that the reason you aren't getting as much gas as you used to is because we have throttled the pipes. They run through a bad part of town and we fear that its possible that some people may be sifting gas off these pipes. (using another situation currently going on as example) This practice is illegal, the providers are basically saying that they have over sold the amount of bandwidth they can currently provide so they are having to come up with methods to ensure everyone gets their "share" of the existing bandwidth. Instead of spending this money where it should be going and that is improving the infrastructure of their existing networks. This is a direct result of anti-trust laws not being pushed to their fullest extent. If there were 10 people in your area providing some sort of in home broadband, we would already be at 100Mb/s for $59.99 with no caps. I love how only certain laws only apply to certain people.
Blessedman... you have it exactly right. The fact is that in many areas Cox, Comcast, etc. have oversold their lines and are not upgrading like they should have been.
It's also true that this is a direct result of little to no competition and antitrust laws not being properly used.
Unfortunately, most of our elected official are too stupid to realize this or are actively on the take from these companies in some fashion.