Special Effects

By Tony Celeste, published on July 18, 2008
Source: Tom's Guide | Keywords: , , | Themes: Software

3. Special Effects

If there is one photo editing area in which PhotoImpact truly excels, it’s the program’s built-in special effects filters. Perhaps best of all, the special effects filters can be used for both still frame photos, or for creating animated effects.

One of most interesting special effects collections is the Creative Lighting filters. There are 10 effects included: Lightning, Fireworks, Lens Flare, Light Bulb, Halo, Spotlight, Flashlight, Meteor, Comet, and Laser. In addition to being used individually, the effects can be combined. The image below shows the PhotoImpact Creative Lighting filter.

In the following image, two fireworks effects are used, plus a lens flare effect behind the fireworks burst on the left. The fireworks on the right use a very subtle hue rotation, to create two slightly differing colors of fireworks in the same fireworks burst.

The PhotoImpact Particle Effect is another unique collection of filters, which contains 8 effects: Bubbles, Clouds, Fire, Fireflies, Rain, Smoke, Snow and Stars.

In the photo below, the PhotoImpact Particle Effect Clouds filter is used to add haze to a photo.

There are 6 additional special effects styled filter packages in PhotoImpact, all of which can be used for both still frame photos and creating animated effects: Animation Studio (effects including water drops, waves, jumps, motion blurs, and page turns); Creative Transform (brushed on warp effects); Creative Warp (warp effects based on fractal-like patterns); Crystal and Glass (effects such as spheres and hexagons); Kaleidoscope Fill (psychedelic patterns, which are not really useful for photo editing); and Type Effect (includes emboss, texture, fire and ice; this is intended for use on fonts and selections).

When these filters are used for animation, you have the option of creating an animated GIF or a sequence of true color bitmap images. You can then open the GIF in Ulead GIF Animator and optimize the file size, or open the series of bitmaps in GIF Animator and create a full color AVI, MPG, QuickTime H.264 movie or Flash animation. The filter’s Save As dialog box includes the option to both save the file and open it in GIF Animator.

There’s only one problem here: Corel didn’t include GIF Animator with PhotoImpact X3, even though it’s been a part of the PhotoImpact ever since the original version. You may be thinking that this isn’t really a problem, since GIF Animator is an inexpensive program that you might not mind buying, but that’s a problem too: Corel pulled Ulead GIF Animator from its product lineup at the end of June. So they not only won’t include it free with PhotoImpact X3, they won’t let you buy it either!

For all of its advantages in the photo editing area, PhotoImpact does have some disadvantages when compared to Photoshop, the most obvious of which is PhotoImpact’s inability to work in the CMYK color space. PhotoImpact can split to and combine from CMYK, which is useful if you like to fine tune attributes such as brightness and contrast based on printer color channels. However, the inability to actually work in CMYK mode, or at least preview images in CMYK mode before printing them, can make it difficult to troubleshoot the issue of monitor colors not matching printer colors.

The main reason for the color discrepancy is that monitors use the RGB color space and printers use the CMYK color space. When an image can be previewed in CMYK mode before printing, the task of color matching becomes more straightforward and accurate. I realize that Ulead was contractually bound to avoid CMYK mode during its non-compete period with Photoshop, but that contract expired a few years ago. There’s no excuse for still not having this feature today.

Also, PhotoImpact does not have a good tool for refining the edges of selections, something that’s often needed in photo editing. Ironically, Corel Photo-Paint has what I feel are the best tools in the business for refining selection edges. Even Photoshop has been somewhat lacking in this area in the past, but has taken a significant step forward with the addition of the Refine Edge tool in CS 3.

Finally, PhotoImpact lacks a high end color transparency selector to use when working with objects and layers. The most disturbing aspect of these disadvantages is that users have been asking for fixes on wish lists and message boards since the year 2000 (if not earlier). Ulead ignored its users, InterVideo ignored its users, and now Corel is ignoring its users.

Comments | Print | Send to a friend

Related albums

Sponsored links

Comments

erichlund 07/18/2008 12:32 PM
Hide
-0+

I'm not that familiar with PhotoImpact, so this was useful to know information. However, it totally ingnores the fact that Corel has it's own "Photoshop", by the name of Paint Shop Pro. PhotoImpact seems much more of a special effects toy, where Photoshop and Paint Shop Pro are more industrial strength tools.

TCeleste 07/19/2008 12:12 PM
Hide
--1+

Unfortunately, it's impossible to mention everything everyone would like to see mentioned, since there's a limited amount of space available for any article.

I always read comments and usually don't respond, since I feel this forum is for the readers. However, there is some clarification that I feel is needed here:

PhotoImpact has roughly the same editing features as many consumer photo editing tools, *plus* the special effects, so I don't feel that "special effects toy" is accurate.

In my opinion, "Corel's Photoshop" is Corel Photo-Paint (which is part of the CorelDraw Graphics Suite). Photo-Paint has a full CMYK editing mode, and the other color and print features that you'd expect in a high-end tool.

I'm not sure that I'd call Paint Shop Pro "Industrial Strength". Paint Shop Pro's features are roughly equivalent to PhotoImpact's, without the special effects. Also, like all consumer editing programs that I've tested, it has no CMYK editing mode (just split/combine, same as PhotoImpact), and it's priced as a consumer editing tool ($79.99 for full version, $49.99 for upgrade version).

bjornlo 07/19/2008 1:45 AM
Hide
-0+

TCeleste,
Unfortunately Corel does not agree with your summation.
If you go to their web site, and select photo programs, they list Paint Shop Pro as their up market product and Photo Impact as their mid-level/entry level one.

http://www.corel.com/servlet/Satel [...] 1657927030

After reading your review, I am puzzled by your mentioning only "Photo Shop" not "Paint Shop Pro Photo". It seems to me that the natural and required information would include differentiating it between not only the segment leader costing 10x's as much but must also include the sibling costing 10% more.

Over all this review presented nothing to help me select between these two competitors. Those considering photo shop do not care about either of these budget tools. While those looking for a budget alternative most certainly care about both of these.

Over all, this omission and the focus on the non-competitive product makes this review a complete waste of space.

Thumbs down for lack of focus on the actual market segment interested in this product.

asdasd123123 07/20/2008 2:51 AM
Hide
-0+

Photo Impact? Never heard of it before, but this is a newbie/amateur application, and you compare it to Photoshop?

Paint Shop Pro X2 replaced literally everything I used to do in Photoshop CS2, and it's filters run faster and simple effects are easier to do.

Anonymous 07/22/2008 2:43 AM
Hide
-0+

Unfortunately, after blowing money on a worthless purchase of Paintshop Pro X - I'll never buy another product from Corel - ever. I've never seen a more bloated piece of buggy, non-functional software.

Anonymous 07/22/2008 6:48 PM
Hide
-0+

What about The GIMP? www.gimp.org
How do you feel it stacks up for photo-image manipulation / image editing?

anonymous123456 12/16/2008 5:52 PM
Hide
-0+

Excellent review! I love this software. The only two major problems are CMYK as stated, and the inability to import brushes.

Anonymous 03/15/2009 12:56 PM
Hide
-1+

PhotoImpact is not a "newbie/amateur application" as suggested by an earlier poster. I have used PI for 8 years from version 4 up to X3 and in many many ways it is easier to use than PSP or Photoshop, by a long shot. It's a great program.

ranix8 10/14/2009 12:00 PM
Hide
-0+

Holla .
I invite u guys to have an look here :
http://www.zooppa.com/users/ranicallas
These are only a few things that i do in PI X3 .
You will find i these images - reflection and many other things.
Please have a look and maybe than you could probably tell that PIX3 is not a good program !!!!!.
PIX3 - 75 $ - PhotoShop 500 and more.
And i think that in photoshop the most nice part are plugins -
Instead of photoshop products i will use - the gimp or PIX3 ,instead of Illustrator i will use Inkscape. instead of acrobat reader i will use foxit ! instead of acrobat reader professional i will use the OpenOffice.
sry for my bad en.

Comments are closed on this page.

Sponsored links