Source: Tom's Guide | Keywords: notebook, laptop, business | Themes: Business Notebooks
- 1. Consider the Ultraportable
- 2. Asus U2E-A1B: Style and Usability
- 3. Asus U2E-AIB: Price, Battery, Performance
- 4. Lenovo Ideapad U110: Style and Usability
- 5. Lenovo Ideapad U110: Price, Battery, Performance
- 6. Toshiba R500-S5006V: Style and Usability
- 7. Toshiba R500-S5006V: Price, Battery, Performance
- 8. Fujitsu P8010: Style and Usability
- 9. Fujitsu P8010: Price, Battery, Performance
- 10. Sony Vaio TZ298: Style and Usability
- 11. Sony Vaio TZ298: Price, Battery, Performance
- 12. Ultraportable Specifications
- 13. Testing: Pre-Test Setup, Battery Life - BatteryEater Pro
- 14. Testing: Performance - Windows Experience Index
- 15. Testing: Performance - PCMark Vantage
- 16. Conclusion
- 17. More on this topic
15. Testing: Performance - PCMark Vantage
On this page we present PCMark Vantage benchmark results, along with a summary performance score.
Performance PCMark Vantage v1.00 with November 2007 Hotfix
FutureMark’s PCMark Vantage tests a computer’s components in a variety of simulated application environments, and also conducts a hard disk drive test. It computes an overall score based on specific tests of the CPU, graphics processor and hard disk drive. Applications and hard disk drive benchmarks include:
Memories Suite The tests in the Memories Suite have been selected to represent the Windows Vista Memories Consumer Scenario. The combination of test sets covers the common Memories scenario usage. The Memories Suite gives a separate PCMark Memories Score which does not affect the overall PCMark Score.
TV and Movies Suite The tests in the TV and Movies Suite have been selected to represent the Windows Vista TV and Movies Consumer Scenario. The combination of test sets covers the common TV and Movies usage. The TV and Movies Suite gives a separate PCMark TV and Movies Score which does not affect the overall PCMark Score.
Gaming Suite The tests in the Gaming Suite have been selected to represent the Windows Vista Gaming Consumer Scenario. The combination of test sets covers the common Gaming usage. The Gaming Suite gives a separate PCMark Gaming Score which does not affect the overall PCMark Score.
Music Suite The tests in the Music Suite have been selected to represent the Windows Vista Music Consumer Scenario. The combination of test sets covers the common Music usage. The Music Suite gives a separate PCMark Music Score which does not affect the overall PCMark Score.
Communications Suite The tests in the Communications Suite have been selected to represent the Windows Vista Communications Consumer Scenario. The combination of test sets covers the common Communications usage. The Communications Suite gives a separate PCMark Communications Score which does not affect the overall PCMark Score.
Productivity Suite The tests in the Productivity Suite have been selected to represent the Windows Vista Productivity Consumer Scenario. The combination of test sets covers the common Productivity usage. The Productivity Suite gives a separate PCMark Productivity Score which does not affect the overall PCMark Score.
HDD Suite The tests in the HDD Suite are a combination of tests covering the common HDD usage. The HDD Suite gives a separate PCMark HDD Score which does not affect the overall PCMark Score.
The above test descriptions are taken directly from FutureMark’s PCMark Vantage Reviewer’s Guide v1.1. You can find the guide here.
Here are the results of the PCMark benchmarks for the five ultraportable notebooks in our roundup.
Note that overall and Memories scores were computed only for the Sony and Toshiba notebooks, both of which have Intel GMA 950 graphics processors. We were unable to find a way to get PCMark Vantage to calculate these scores for the other three notebooks, all of which have Intel GMA X3100 graphics processors. So, in computing our own overall performance scores for the five notebooks (see below) we exclude both the PCMark Overall and Memories scores from our calculations.
Remember that this benchmark and the ones that follow, except for the hard disk drive test, are based on the performance of all components. The Lenovo is a clear winner here, though it’s important to note that, overall, these scores and the other application-oriented scores reported here are quite low compared to scores obtained by higher-powered mobile and desktop computers.
While the TV and Movies benchmark ran on all five notebooks, playback of both sound and images was choppy. This doesn’t mean that playback of other, less demanding content—commercial DVDs, for example—would suffer from similar unevenness.
For those who know gaming and the standard PCMark/3DMark game tests, these are abysmal numbers; motion was very, very choppy. You’re not going to play serious games on these notebooks.
The Lenovo’s fast CPU and the Sony’s solid state disk drive gave them an edge in the Music benchmark.
The Lenovo’s CPU again gave it a slight advantage in Communications performance.
Sony’s solid state disk drive helped it walk away with the honors in the Productivity benchmark.
And, again, Sony’s solid state disk drive gave it a towering advantage in the now misnamed "Hard Disk Drive" test.
Overall Performance Index
Our overall performance index was calculated using all PCMark Vantage scores except for the Overall and Memories scores, because those scores could not be computed for the three notebooks with X3100 graphics processors. The Windows Experience Index benchmarks are excluded because the method for calculating them produces scores that are relatively much lower than the PCMark scores. Thus, WEI scores would have very, very little impact on an overall performance score.
As might be expected, based mostly on its solid state disk drive, the Sony aced the overall performance score, and the Lenovo came in second on the strength of its faster 1.6 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo CPU.
Calculating The Performance Score for Each Notebook
In the discussion of each notebook, you’ll remember that we presented a score between 1 and 5 for each notebook’s performance. As with battery life, we gave a score of 5 to the notebook scoring the highest on our Overall Performance Index, then set all other scores by dividing their performance figures into the leader’s number and multiplying by 5. Here the Sony got a score of 5 as the highest performing notebook for overall performance, based on its overall score of 2843. Then the score for the Lenovo, for example, was determined by taking the latter’s score of 1952, dividing it into 2843 and multiplying by 5 to yield a score of 3.48.
- Previous page Testing: Performance - Windows...
- Next page Conclusion
I like to read about these notebooks. They still exist and useful while other more exciting categories are around. (MID, UMPC, Netbook, and ultra gaming notebooks)
No it's not. The MBA is at no point thicker than 0.79", and Apple makes a point of it on the product design page.
Otherwise, good article. But I think I'm not the target consumer for these products, so I'm going to be getting the new MacBook Pro. I need that extra performance for graphics-intensive applications. Then again, that would be a primary computer. If I had the extra cash, I would go for a MBA as a secondary, because I can't stand the smaller keyboards and screens but a laptop more portable than the MBP would be nice to have sometimes.
Then again, I'm a Mac lover, so my views are undoubtedly skewed towards almost anything that runs OSX and has a giant Apple logo plastered on it.
This article is full of logical mishaps where the author contradicts herself, e.g.
"I never felt this machine get warmer than room temperature, nor make any noise at all. That’s surprising given the U110 has a weak hard drive (only running at 4,200 RPM)"
[a weak hard disk should make it NOT suprising]
or
"...the bottom can get hot. Some of the heat and noise can be attributed to the U2E’s underpowered CPU (...) With such a low-power processor, this machine is bound to stay pretty cool to the touch most of the time."
[the second sentence is correct but (rightfully) contradicts the first one]
Those two aren't the only ones. The article should be reworked.
Pity not to see the very lovely Samsung Q210 in this list. I've gone for the Q310, simply out of preference for something a little more tangible, but the spec and build quality on both of these are super, not to mention the reasonable prices!
Finally, I was wondering when Tom's would review an Asus based laptop considering they've been around for years. I actually like Asus's designs and own an ancient Z33ae ultralight from years ago although recently I've begun to wonder if the leather in the new laptops isn't overkill.
Still considering the heavy use / abuse I've put my Asus laptop through while only suffering from a burnt out power button light, I have to admire it's durability. Sure they do cost a little more but the build quality is what makes up for it. My experience with Toshibas so far is that they're cheap and they work extremely well. Just don't expect anything special, they seem mass produced. Sony's I've had breakdown on me unfortunately. They have admirable design but it's something I'm reluctant to touch.
The Thinkpad X200s and X200 should have been part of this review. They use the newer Centrino 2 Montevina platform with the faster X4500HD GPU that can run Blu-Ray and with the Intel 5300 WiFi.
The X200s goes for about $2K but there will be sales. The X200 has already been on sale with a $1300 pricetag for a full config.
X200s Review (with link to X200):
http://www.laptopmag.com/review/la [...] x200s.aspx
X200s: 11 hours battery with WiFi LED backlit 1440x900 display 3.2 lbs 12" with full sized keyboard, same as in larger "T" series. Full sized 2.5" hard drive or SSD 64 GB or 128 GB. 1.86 GHz SL CPU
X200: 8 hours battery with WiFi CCFL backlit 1280x800 display 3.6 lbs and same options as X200s. CPU 2.26 GHz or 2.4 GHz. Fast!
Both laptops have two smaller battery options for less weight.
This article is full of logical mishaps where the author contradicts herself, e.g."I never felt this machine get warmer than room temperature, nor make any noise at all. That’s surprising given the U110 has a weak hard drive (only running at 4,200 RPM)"[a weak hard disk should make it NOT suprising]or"...the bottom can get hot. Some of the heat and noise can be attributed to the U2E’s underpowered CPU (...) With such a low-power processor, this machine is bound to stay pretty cool to the touch most of the time."[the second sentence is correct but (rightfully) contradicts the first one]Those two aren't the only ones. The article should be reworked.
Thanks for your comment, Tim851.
Here's what I meant about the U110's weak hard drive. I've found that when a machine has a weak hard drive, the drive tends to spin almost constantly even during basic computing tasks. When this constant spinning occurs, the machine typically gets hot. But on the U110, even though the hard drive was only 4200rpm, the hard drive at least didn't cause the machine to get warm--it didn't seem to strain or spin constantly as one would expect. Does that make more sense? Yes, a lower powered processor would help to keep things cool, but a severely underpowered hard drive could make things hotter, too. Happy to discuss further.
All the best,
Rachel Rosmarin, Editor of Tom's Guide
The TZ series is still available for purchase. Possibly not that particular model but overall the recall did not kill the entire product line.
The TZ series is still available for purchase. Possibly not that particular model but overall the recall did not kill the entire product line.
Hi Anon,
Can you provide a link to Sony's site showing a TZ available for purchase? If so, I'll amend the article. Thanks.
Rachel Rosmarin, Editor of Tom's Guide
hell no, the first time I saw lenovo in the pics I thought ( when does Dell Studio becomes an Ultra portable notebook ? )
Lenovo just copied Dell's design and made some changes !!
Here we go again... who would ever buy a notebook of any shape or size at any price with only 2-3 hours of battery life? That's basically UNUSEABLE. They talk like it's acceptable. A dead computer has NO performance, NO style, NO value! Cross country trips? what country -- Leichtenstein? WORTHLESS! I am still waiting -- please make a USEABLE portable device with at the very least 4-6 hours battery time, preferably 8-10 hours or more. I would like to be able to surf, show the kids a movie, do some work, play a game etc. on a trip and then watch another movie myself after that and show people pictures of my family. IF YOU MAKE IT, I WILL BUY IT IMMEDIATELY. I don't want to have to constantly watch and worry about the battery, and people use their computers for EVERYTHING these days -- THATS WHY WE WANT PORTABLE ONES NOW! Is my life supposed to stop in 2-3 hours? COME ON! I am getting upset about this, I KNOW I'm not the only one who feels this way. What's wrong with these people? Make a useable laptop that I can use all day (8-12 hours) and can plug in overnight. End of story.
Here we go again... who would ever buy a notebook of any shape or size at any price with only 2-3 hours of battery life? That's basically UNUSEABLE. They talk like it's acceptable. A dead computer has NO performance, NO style, NO value! Cross country trips? what country -- Leichtenstein? WORTHLESS! I am still waiting -- please make a USEABLE portable device with at the very least 4-6 hours battery time, preferably 8-10 hours or more. I would like to be able to surf, show the kids a movie, do some work, play a game etc. on a trip and then watch another movie myself after that and show people pictures of my family. IF YOU MAKE IT, I WILL BUY IT IMMEDIATELY. I don't want to have to constantly watch and worry about the battery, and people use their computers for EVERYTHING these days -- THATS WHY WE WANT PORTABLE ONES NOW! Is my life supposed to stop in 2-3 hours? COME ON! I am getting upset about this, I KNOW I'm not the only one who feels this way. What's wrong with these people? Make a useable laptop that I can use all day (8-12 hours) and can plug in overnight. End of story.
Thanks for your comment, SpiralSun. Okay, you're right--there's no tiny computer that lasts 8-12 hours. We just aren't there yet, technologically speaking. But, most of the computers in our round up can easily last 4 hours, and the Sony will definitely last more than 6 hours. Keep in mind that our BatteryEater test maxes out a machine's power consumption. In normal use, all of these machines would last more than 2 hours.
Thanks,
Rachel Rosmairn
Editor, Tom's Guide
Instead of considering these laptops, I'd rather go at BenQ X31. Extra inch on the display but monsterous graphics(8600GT) for a 13 inchers, and this means hell more performance and more plausible productivity. Have a look
http://benq.com/products/joybook/? [...] ifications
I love the idea of an ultraportable, but Tom's Guide and I have different requirements. I'm old enough that a larger screen means more to me than a DVD drive. I'm more likely to work on the plane than I am to watch a DVD. I almost never use the optical drive on my laptop other than to load software. Most people would consider me a road warrior, but my computing needs are very simple: internet, Word Processing, simple spreadsheets, email and presentations. Light weight, long battery life and a screen big enough that I don't have to spend more time scrolling than reading. I've loved my Fujitsu Lifebook S-6231, but it's now a little long in the tooth. the only problems have been short battery life and it's 4 lb. weight.
Couple things confused me. First, there's a button on the Sony that can launch multimedia without booting? Does this mean the machine can act like a DVD/MP3/MP4 player without booting into Windows? To me that would be an incredible Plus, watching videos on a plane without Windows running/eating up more power.
Second, what does Windows Vista Business w/ XP Pro Recovery media mean? Makes it sound like the manufacturer put the wrong DVD in the packaging. Is this supposed to mean you can revert to WindowsXP with the media they included (in addition to restoring Vista if necessary)?