Download the
Tom's Guide App from the AppsStore
News and trends on internet
/ mobile / "sound & picture" / IT
Yes No

Plastic Logic Shows Shatterproof, Slim Ereader

- By - Source : Tom's Guide US

Plastic Logic finally lifts the curtain on its ebook reader.

Meet Plastic Logic's super-skinny, capacitive touchscreen ebook reader, the Que. Despite the fact that we've called it an ereader twice already, Que is touting this device as much more than that. Dubbing the device a proReader, the company aims to, 'simplify the the multi-faceted lifestyle of the modern businessperson, and to quite literally lighten their workload.' Of course, you can read books and newspapers too but for the 'modern businessperson' the Que also includes support for Word, PDF, PowerPoint and Excel documents. 

That's great and all, but the bit we're most taken with is the shatterproof plastic display. No one wants to fork out hundreds of dollars on an ereader only to accidentally crack the screen by shoving it in their purse or backback. When it comes to briefcase real estate, the Que measures in at 8.5 x 11 inches and is less than a 1/3 inch thick.

Right now, there are very few details other than what you read above and some very nice photographs. Plastic Logic promises to reveal everything at the annual consumer electronics show in Las Vegas this coming January.

Share:
10
Comments
X

Comments

pbrigido 10/19/2009 7:57 PM
Hide
-3+

Give me a hammer, then we will see how shatter proof it is.

jellico 10/19/2009 8:02 PM
Hide
-2+

Well, the display may be shatterproof (see the video with that OLED screen in a previous article), but the electronics are probably not quite as resiliant. Nonetheless, it is nice they made the reader that much more durable.

doc70 10/19/2009 8:27 PM
Hide
-2+

should have:
-ePaper screen
-expansion slot(s)

and I will consider it.

ominous prime 10/19/2009 9:51 PM
Hide
-1+

They really need to focus on features and actual usability rather than the, "Hey look you can pull a Michael Jackson and hold me outside a balcony, but you can really drop me!"

To soon?

niz 10/20/2009 12:15 PM
Hide
-1+

doh. Yet another device with a built-in rechargable battery so the whole device will be useless in 3 years when the battery gets worn out.

niz 10/20/2009 12:25 PM
Hide
-1+

Stupid Stupid Stupid.
It looks like this is yet another device with a built-in (read: non-standard and unreplaceable) rechargable battery. This means:
a) yet another recharger to remember to pack every time you go away
b) You're repeatedly screwed because your device takes hours to recharge
c) You have to buy a whole new reader every 2-3 years because over that time the battery degrades until it wont hold a charge any more.

I will only consider buying one of these when they build one that takes AA's.

johnny_5 10/20/2009 6:11 AM
Hide
-0+

The What?
;)

martin0642 10/20/2009 7:51 AM
Hide
-0+

I can't think of many devices of this nature that I have used past 3 years. In that span, there is usually a process shrink, battery advancements, and fundamental science breakthrough that happen which convince me to upgrade. We've got batteries in the lab that charge in 30 seconds to 80% capacity right now. Nano-Structure use in batteries is changing the field dramatically.

People are starting to take for granted the tech shrinkage that is taking place. The phone can't get much smaller or it'll be to small for human hands; instead more capability will be crapped into the same amount of space. Circuits are so cheap, we have them in talking greeting cards and then throw them away.

So I don't mind an integrated battery as long as it performs until I replace the device, which at this pace, is likely less than three years. At which time I'll get my hoverboard/reader/food replicator combo device, and it's integrated battery, and replace it later when I can get the phaser option.

With the logic used here, no one would have bought a Model-T, which would have deprived us everything that followed. This device is aimed at businesses, just like the first SSDs, and from those big pockets, the R&D will be paid for, after which time regular people will get them for the manufacturing cost plus some profit margin.

WyomingKnott 10/20/2009 3:23 PM
Hide
-0+

Unlike all the "wouldn't buy" folks above, I am interested.
I've been waiting for a device with at least as much screen area as a normal papeback book, without weighing so much that I might as well bring along a netbook.
Being that large does suggest a portability problem: I can see it in a backpack or briefcase, but not carried around.
And book replacements will still need many things that books provide: the ability to make marginal notes, post multiple bookmarks (like sticky notes), flip through it looking for a familiar section. And maybe they can come with a spray-can of that musty-paper scent.

Regulas 10/20/2009 11:04 PM
Hide
-0+

I agree 100% with the whole sealed battery thing.
Let us put in a set of AAA or AA 2/4 of them. You can pick a set of rechargable AAA and charger for under $20. Then if in a pinch you can always buy some alkaline.
I made sure my digital camera uses AA batteries (4ea) for the same reason and I don't buy any Apple crap with their proprietary sealed batteries either.