Bummer: Microsoft's TV Subscription Plan On Hold
Microsoft has reportedly bailed out of live TV streaming negotiations after networks and studios informed it of their high licensing fees. Exit, stage left.
Just last month, Microsoft rolled out the revamped Xbox Dashboard with the blocky Metro design while shoving previous add-on features like Netflix and Twitter into the Apps category. This was the second major OS overhaul since the console hit the market back in 2006, and promised to make the gadget a bit more entertainment-friendly with the introduction of TV programming and integrated Kindle support.
But Microsoft also reportedly had plans to introduce a separate set-top box called Microsoft TV that, like the Xbox 360, would bypass local cable companies and satellite TV providers altogether by channeling in Microsoft's own TV subscription service. This would take a more Hulu-like approach by offering current TV shows and actual live networks.
So with both units poised and ready to take on the world, the Redmond company began to solicit offers from cable providers and networks about the cost of streaming live. The "intense talks" stretched on for over a year, and Microsoft had hoped to wrap things up in time to stream content to consumers over the next few months.
But Microsoft quickly discovered the harsh, cruel reality that is Hollywood, and pulled out of negotiations after content providers demanded licensing fees that were far more than Microsoft wanted to spend. Insiders close to the matter stated that the fees were just too insanely high for the business model Microsoft apparently envisioned.
"They built Microsoft TV, they demoed it for us, they asked for rate cards but then said 'ooh ah, that's expensive,'" said one unnamed senior media executive.
As it stands now, Microsoft's TV service -- what there is of it thus far -- is to compliment the user's current cable and satellite subscription, not replace it. For example, just days ago during CES 2012, Microsoft's keynote presentation revealed that News Corp had signed on to provide content from its numerous channels including FOX, FOX News, The Wall Street Journal and more via an app.
Still, content providers are hopeful that Microsoft will return to re-negotiate. After all, there's plenty of room for one more TV service provider to rival Time Warner and Comcast. "It doesn't mean they won't be back in another iteration. We'll have to wait and see," said the senior media executive.
ZDnet points out that this very conflict between Microsoft and content providers may be why Apple is seemingly stalling the iTV. Like Microsoft before it, Apple is reportedly trying to hammer out the negotiations and will no doubt face the same steep licensing fees that sent Microsoft running.
- This is Intel's Vision for the "Smart" Car of the Future
- Sony's Music Unlimited Finally Arriving on iOS in 1Q12
- Apple Mini-Stores Are Heading to Target
- JVC Shows Off World's First 4K Handheld Camcorder
- Sony Unveils SmartWatch Companion for Your Android
- Griffin Unveils the Cuddly Woogie 2 Case at CES 2012
- Microsoft Preps Big IE9 Ad Campaign
- Bookmakers Give iPhone 5 Announcement 20:1 Payout
- The SpareOne Cell Phone Runs On One AA Battery
- Another Look at the Gorgeous Nokia Lumia 900 LTE Phone
- Finally, A Tool for Sending Files From PC to Kindle
- More Details Surrounding MSFT's Standalone TV Box Emerge
- Justin Bieber Was at CES to Awkwardly Mic a Dancing Robot
- Internet Addiction Could Have Biological Indicator
- Apple Discloses Component Suppliers of iPad, iPhone, iPod
- Symantec Source Code Released Today, Says Hacker
- Windows Phone Beats 88% of Competitors in Speed Test
- Words With Friends Actually Saved Someone's Life
- Rupert Murdoch Admits To Killing MySpace

How many people have had it with Hollywood and TV providers? I have cut the cord for more than a year and don't miss it. Jersey Shore, this is what I am to pay money for?
I'd do anything to dump my overpriced cable service.
"integrated Kindle support. "
You mean Kinect?
So, what about Apple TV?
This sounds like something that will make that expensive as well...
How many people have had it with Hollywood and TV providers? I have cut the cord for more than a year and don't miss it. Jersey Shore, this is what I am to pay money for?
No kiddin.
There hasn't been a exceptional movie(the kind that you want to watch over and over) for many years as well either...
I'd do anything to dump my overpriced cable service.
Would you install an antenna on your roof?
Sorry, but little comments bother me. iTV does not exist as a product from Apple, and I hope it never will. iTV is a broadcast channel in the UK, as it has been since the mid 1960s, and I hope they have the spine to keep their brand name in the face of some ass hat companies obsession with naming everything iXXX.
How many people have had it with Hollywood and TV providers? I have cut the cord for more than a year and don't miss it. Jersey Shore, this is what I am to pay money for?
I have not had cable for many years and installed an antenna on my roof. Sure I miss a few of the good cable only programs. But when I had cable I was willing to watch most anything, just because it was available and my sofa was so comfortable. Now, I watch far less junk TV.
No kiddin.There hasn't been a exceptional movie(the kind that you want to watch over and over) for many years as well either...
thats personal taste, if we go last 5 years, there are more than a few i would watch again.
Well, there's always bittorrent.
People watch in "awe" the superstars on the red carpet. But let's face it, in the end YOU and I are paying for Charly Sheen's and other's exploits via horrendous cable bills and movie ticket prices.
For me a roof top antenna is sufficient to watch a few reruns of the Simpsons or whatever brain candy I am in the mood for before going to bed.
Fudge the cable companies and Hollywood :-(