Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Bill to Tax Violent Video Games Introduced in Oklahoma

By - Source: KFOR-TV

If you can't ban them, why not tax them?

If you can't pass a law banning the sale of violent video games to minors, why not just slap on an extra tax? That should discourage sales to minors, right? That's the central idea behind a new proposal slithering out of Oklahoma by House Rep. William Fourkiller (D. 86th District).

According to the new bill, HB 2696, consumers purchasing games rated Teen, Mature and Adult Only by the ESRB would have a 1-percent tax added on to the current pricetag. Money generated from the "Violent Game Tax" would go towards the state's Childhood Outdoor Education Revolving Fund to fight obesity and the Bullying Prevention Revolving Fund.

Fourkiller, whose last name sounds like an Xbox Live alias, claims he was inspired to write the bill based on first-hand experience on how video games can lead to obesity and bullying. "A gentleman shot a police officer and stole his car," he told Oklahoma City's KFOR-TV, referring to a recent incident. "He had been playing Grand Theft Auto."

Fourkiller said that he's not personally targeting the gaming industry, but is quite astonished that an actual game called "Bully" even exists given that bullying is (supposedly) one of the side affects kids face after playing violent video games. But he also acknowledges that not everyone reacts to video games in the same way.

"I believe after hours and hours of watching the screen, playing the video game, being that person and taking on that role, people get desensitized," he added.

If the bill is approved by Republican governor Mary Fallin, all games sold within the state with a "T," "M" or "AO" rating will see a 1-percent price increase starting as early as July 1. The bill was supposedly read before the House on Monday, February 6.

Wired has a copy of the proposal here in PDF format. It's believed that the bill will likely fail even if it becomes a law, a failure based on the ruling by the Supreme Court back in June 2011 which said California could not declare violent video games as obscene to exempt them from First Amendment protection.

So far there's no word on the bill's progress given that it's a day after the reading before the House, so stay tuned. There's also a good chance we'll see copycat lawmen in other states try and pull the same stunt in the next few weeks. Here we go again.

There are 71 Comments. B
Top Comments
  • 27 Ð
    everygamer , February 8, 2012 6:27 AM
    Last I checked the supreme court defined video games as a work of art, another medium similar to video .. do they tax violent video, paintings, music and books? If they don't then the government is getting in the way of free trade and the fair market.

    I have a good idea, how about spending a little more time looking at how to fix our economy and get people working than going after one of the only successful markets left in this country.
  • 23 Ð
    everygamer , February 8, 2012 6:29 AM
    Lets see, were going to slap a 5% tax on violent video games ... exactly how is that going to stop minors from playing them? Its up to parents and stores to make sure kids don't play games they shouldn't, not the government.
  • 21 Ð
    bustapr , February 8, 2012 6:20 AM
    thats so wrong. judging by the charity he chose, the guy must really have a terrible belief of what video games are. Hint, not every game is called Grand Theft Auto...
Other Comments
  • 21 Ð
    bustapr , February 8, 2012 6:20 AM
    thats so wrong. judging by the charity he chose, the guy must really have a terrible belief of what video games are. Hint, not every game is called Grand Theft Auto...
  • 10 Ð
    Ragnar-Kon , February 8, 2012 6:20 AM
    Disagree with the sales tax for Teen rated games.

    I can sorta, kinda, not-really see a tax for mature and adult rated games. Although I'll admit the only reason why I am not completely against the tax is because it is being put to something that is becoming increasingly important in the US.

    BUT, I don't live in Oklahoma, so my opinion doesn't matter anyway.
  • 17 Ð
    anonymous@guest , February 8, 2012 6:26 AM
    what about graphic tv, movies and music too? graphic art?
  • 27 Ð
    everygamer , February 8, 2012 6:27 AM
    Last I checked the supreme court defined video games as a work of art, another medium similar to video .. do they tax violent video, paintings, music and books? If they don't then the government is getting in the way of free trade and the fair market.

    I have a good idea, how about spending a little more time looking at how to fix our economy and get people working than going after one of the only successful markets left in this country.
  • 2 Ð
    anonymous@guest , February 8, 2012 6:28 AM
    yeah sure tax violent video games, but please tax every violent movie, tv show, music with violence, etc as well
  • 18 Ð
    erunion , February 8, 2012 6:29 AM
    Interesting. Once violent video games become an income source for governments they will have legal protection; like cigarettes. Try to ban video games then. Heck, EA might even get its own bailout.

    Welcome to the military-entertainment complex!
  • 23 Ð
    everygamer , February 8, 2012 6:29 AM
    Lets see, were going to slap a 5% tax on violent video games ... exactly how is that going to stop minors from playing them? Its up to parents and stores to make sure kids don't play games they shouldn't, not the government.
  • 6 Ð
    anonymous@guest , February 8, 2012 6:36 AM
    How about a tax on every movie and tv show with anything violence or maybe even the school plays etc.......where does this end.
  • -7 Ð
    fyasko , February 8, 2012 6:45 AM
    they need to ban kids from owning "violent" games. kids need to be studying not playing the next FPS or violent RPG. it's strange that they card people when buying porn but not violent movies/games. either have it all open and available or none of it. parents are to blame, stop buying violent video games for your kids.
  • 5 Ð
    croc4 , February 8, 2012 6:52 AM
    This is completely stupid, another classic example of why every political legislator should be part time only. Don't they have better things to do? (apparently not), this is just sound bite legislation, it sounds great to the soccer moms.

    Just think, if part time then the salary he would have been paid could be used for better purposes, the days of public servants serving the public are long over, they only serve themselves to our money, wake up people!!!

  • 16 Ð
    mrmez , February 8, 2012 6:54 AM
    1% today, 10% tomorrow.
  • 13 Ð
    GenericUser , February 8, 2012 7:07 AM
    I've been playing violent video games since I was 4 years old and I've yet to commit even a traffic violation in my life.
  • 8 Ð
    animeman59 , February 8, 2012 7:07 AM
    Should we even support the ESA's actions towards this piece of legislation? I'm still burned by their support of SOPA and PIPA. We gamers always do our part to support the industry in stopping legislation like this, but when has the industry stepped up to protect our rights in fighting SOPA? They haven't.

    They want to stop the government from treating the industry as a bunch of criminals sullying the minds of the young, but they treat their supporters like a bunch of thieves who steal software at every opportunity.

    Screw you ESA. You're on your own.
  • 2 Ð
    bin1127 , February 8, 2012 7:16 AM
    How does taxing mature games help prevent minors playing them? A better idea is to show the retailer the age of the child whom the parent is buying for and then slap on a 5% income tax to discourage the parent.

    But really, stop treating every gamer as potential gun slinging murderer and you'll probably invoke less violent upbringing. Then again, it's oklahoma.
  • 5 Ð
    jryan388 , February 8, 2012 7:25 AM
    causation vs correlation
  • 3 Ð
    drwho1 , February 8, 2012 7:26 AM
    DelwareHow about a tax on every movie and tv show with anything violence or maybe even the school plays etc.......where does this end.


    We already have that... is called Commercials, you know those annoying interruptions that we get while watching our TV shows.

  • -2 Ð
    fb39ca4 , February 8, 2012 7:33 AM
    They should tax all games then. After all, they all contribute to obesity. Arguably, leapster type "edu-games" being pushed on toddlers are doing more harm however.
  • 2 Ð
    Camikazi , February 8, 2012 7:36 AM
    drwho1We already have that... is called Commercials, you know those annoying interruptions that we get while watching our TV shows.

    Except there are commercials for every type of TV show there is, there are no exceptions, if it's on TV and not a special thing (or a cable channel) it will have commercials so it's not the same as taxing only violent games.
  • 4 Ð
    draphius , February 8, 2012 7:39 AM
    i dont give a flying buck what he thinks, show me some proof. also these people usually have no life thats why they have to intrude on others. tom sullivan did an awesome interview with a legislator years ago, and during the interview he asked the lady why she thought she needed to tell people how to live there lives and here answer was "because i have no life" i give her props for her honesty but srsly she shoulda lost her job the minute that left her mouth
Display more comments
Tom’s guide in the world
  • Germany
  • France
  • Italy
  • Ireland
  • UK
Follow Tom’s guide
Subscribe to our newsletter