Microsoft Suing TiVo Over Patent Infringement
Microsoft is taking AT&T's side in a patent infringement claim made by TiVo.
The Wall Street Journal reports that Microsoft filed a lawsuit against TiVo on late Tuesday in a San Francisco court, accusing the DVR manufacturer of an alleged patent infringement. The lawsuit is considered as retaliation against TiVo on behalf of AT&T.
TiVo filed an earlier suit against AT&T in regards to the telecommunications giant's Internet-based TV service, U-Verse, and possible infringements on TiVo technology. Microsoft is involved because U-Verse is powered by Microsoft's Mediaroom software.
Kevin Kutz, director of public affairs for Microsoft, told the WSJ that the company was willing to resolve the dispute through a licensing agreement, and has even attempted to hold talks with TiVo. The technology in question includes the presentation of programming information, and the means of purchasing and delivering video content.
Unfortunately, TiVo appears intent on pursuing AT&T. "We remain confident in our position that AT&T will be found to infringe on the TiVo patents asserted," the company said in a statement. TiVo also acknowledged Microsoft's involvement with AT&T's defense, and said that the recent lawsuit will not have any bearing on its case against AT&T.
TiVo also recently filed a lawsuit against Verizon Communications Inc, accusing the company of patent infringement related to the TV "time-warping" technology used in their DVRs. TiVo also has current, long-running disputes with Dish Networks Corp. and Echostar Corp. over the same DRV patent infringement claims.
- NYT.com Announces Subscription Model for 2011
- Sony's Motion Controller Delayed Until the Fall
- One Third of 11-Year-Olds Have Cell Phones
- Science Project Causes Bomb Scare, Evacuation
- Korea: Virtual Currency Just As Good As Cash
- Rumor: WinMo 7 'Zune Phones' From HTC and LG
- 9-year-old IT Wiz Says PC Games a Waste of Time
- Maid Robot Cleans Your Clothes, Microwaves Food
- NASA Selling Atlantis, Endeavour 30% Off Deal
- White House Lands App on iPhone, iPod Touch
- McAfee Launches China Hack Detection Tool
- Man Arrested for Airport 'Bomb Threat' Tweet
- HP Planning Mainstream 3D Printers
- Halo: Reach Screenshots Hit the Internet
- Nintendo DS R4 Importer Sentenced to Prison
- YouTube Introduces Movie Rentals
- No Lie: Nintendo Publishing Digital Romance Novels
- Haiti: Man Uses iPhone and Camera to Survive
- George Lucas Seriously Considering Star Wars 3D

I wanted to call this a lawsuit triangle, but it seems like more sides keep on appearing. It has now evolved into the Telecommunications Multidimensional Array of Lawsuits.
I wanted to call this a lawsuit triangle, but it seems like more sides keep on appearing. It has now evolved into the Telecommunications Multidimensional Array of Lawsuits.
Better trademark that so you can join in the fun later on down the road
I wanted to call this a lawsuit triangle, but it seems like more sides keep on appearing. It has now evolved into the Telecommunications Multidimensional Array of Lawsuits.
ha ha ha....good one...
I should have been a lawyer.
Score one for the good guys. After getting their butts sued a lot, this is nice to see.
Why do these authors post such crap? TiVo initiated the lawsuit.
I should email this article link over to the MS law team.
Hope no one patents the idea of getting a business partner to file retaliatory lawsuits...
How do they just now realize the have a patent?
Hope no one patents the idea of getting a business partner to file retaliatory lawsuits...
Too late.....expect to see a new article in a few years......just waiting for a few more companies to break the patent first, then it's off to the islands for me.
Seriously though I'm all for technology patents. I'm against procedural patents that make no sense. MS is just playing the game, like they've been played. In business two wrongs do make a right, but for the us it's just a simple "really?" situation.
Kramer said it best "2.1% finacing on a Toyota One ton. That was my idea too!"
Why lawsuit now if you can wait for the breaker to win money
How do they just now realize the have a patent?
Why suit now when they have made no or little money? Wait for it and get a whole lotta cash later.