Roundup: 8 Laptops : MSI EX620
7. MSI EX620
The Screen
For a system that bills itself as a multimedia hub, an excellent screen is a must. Unfortunately, the monitor on the EX620 is anything but.
The most worrying aspects are: narrow viewing angles, slow response times and a contrast ratio of just 214:1 thanks to black at 0.91 cd/m² against white of 214 cd/m².
The list goes on, though ... there's a very strong blue dominance, for instance, that requires extensive calibration to iron out.
We're fast becoming sick of such poor quality hardware in laptops. It seems hardly worth pointing out that, as usual, it's a glossy, rather than a matte, panel.
MSI's advertising for their new 16'' collection is ambitious, claiming that these laptops will 'become the multimedia centre of your home.' They're banking on the inclusion of an Intel T5800 Core 2 Duo CPU and an ATI HD3470 graphics card to power the 16'', 1366 x 768 resolution screen to help them achieve the goal of creating a "truly mobile home cinema experience".
Handling
The outside of the laptop is made from a mixture of matte and glossy plastics, with the keyboard's outer casing made in the former and the frame around the screen and the area in front of the keyboard in the latter. Compared to the more innovative design of the Lenovo IdeaPad Y650, MSI has adopted a more traditional laptop look.
For the time being, it's the only 16'' laptop we've tested with a numeric keypad, meaning the whole keyboard takes up almost all of the room available, with barely a centimetre to spare on either a side, which is perhaps why it tends to sag a little in the middle. Another irritation is the Fn key, at the far bottom left, where the Ctrl key usually is, leading to lots of problems with keyboard shorcuts.
The touch pad in front of the keypad is the usual size for a laptop, which means it looks very small compared to the one on the Lenovo IdeaPad Y650. A fingerprint reader is included in between the left and right-click buttons, while some touch-sensitive hotkeys for controlling multimedia are found along the top.
When it's working hard, this laptop is very loud. If you're looking for a quiet computer, look elsewhere, as once the fans kick in on the EX620, you won't get much peace.
As you can see, the webcam produces reasonable results, even if your cheeks end up looking rosier than you might have expected. The microphone is an entirely different story, though: our test recordings were ruined by interference and a particularly annoying, sharp, feedback.
Around the outside, there is an RJ45 Ethernet port, a modem, four mini-jacks for audio, three USB ports as well as a combined USB/e-SATA port, an Express Card 54 slot, an input for a television antenna and HDMI and VGA video outputs. It's almost a perfect selection, but if you wanted to be cruel, you could gripe that there's no FireWire.
When we turned the computer over, we found a sticker covering the flaps warning that opening them up would invalidate the warranty. That didn't stop us, of course, and we had easy access to the Western Digital hard drive and the pair of 2 GB Transcend RAM modules, among other things.
![]() | ![]() |
| TV input (right, yellow) | Optical and analog audio ports |
![]() | ![]() |
| Combined USB and e-SATA port | Fingerprint reader |
Processing Power
Windows Experience Index: 4.0. CPU: 4.9 - Memory: 4.8 - Graphics: 4.0 - Gaming Graphics: 4.0 - Hard Drive: 5.1.
This MSI EX620, with its T5800 CPU, and the Sony VGN-FW31E, which has a T6400 CPU, both run at exactly 2 GHz. The difference between the two processors comes down to the fact that MSI's is manufactured at 65 nm while Sony's is at 45 nm. It might seem like a very small difference, but the two computers showed very different results in some of our tests.
Sony managed to finish just ahead of MSI, with a score of 77 against the EX620's 73, indexed against a score of 100 for our standard reference model, the Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo Xi3650. However, MSI did particularly badly at two of our tests, audio encoding in Cubase (35% slower) and producing DivX video in TEMPGenc (22% slower).
Given the overall similarity of the other test results, we can't blame these two discrepancies on the technical differences between the two CPUs and lots of other factors come into play. It's important to remember that CPUs that are more powerful on paper don't always necessarily translate into more impressive results in every case.
When reading Blu-ray video, power consumption is between 56 and 62 W with a CPU load of 70 to 80%, without turning on graphic acceleration. Both figures are quite high, especially given how loud the fan is. After turning on the acceleration, the noise levels drop drastically thanks to a much lower CPU load of just 8-10% requiring 41 W of power.
Gaming
The ATI HD3470 graphics card in the EX620 is also found in the Sony Vaio VGN-FW31E, but here it has a lower resolution screen to deal with. What difference does that make in practice? With Crysis, none: you still need to keep the quality 'low' with antialiasing deactivated if you want to play at native resolution. The same is true of World in Conflict, where the improvement in quality from low to normal mode is noticeable. You should choose the former if you'd rather more responsive graphics, but if you go for the latter you'll pay for that extra detail with slower performance.
Sound
There are two sets of audio inputs and outputs, one optical and one analog. Although four sound ports may seem like overkill, it's actually a very useful feature. You can keep your speakers plugged in using the high-quality optical link (this is a multimedia system, after all), but still swap headphones and external microphones without having to worry about plugging everything in again afterwards.
Portability & Battery Life
5.94 pounds on the scales for just 1 hour 26 minutes of video playback is not very impressive. The EX620's direct competitors manage to get closer to 2 hours, and if you lose some screen space and move down to a 13'' laptop, you can expect to gain at least sixty minutes, taking you above three hours in some cases.
| MSI EX620 | |
|---|---|
| Pros | Cons |
|
|
This laptop has two major problems: the amount of noise its fans make when it's working hard and the inferior screen. Minor defects, perhaps, but for a multimedia hub, they're difficult to ignore. The extra optical audio connections are a promising sign.













Could put up a list of hardware for comparison, for ease of user to compare those product not by points but by hardware parts.
High points does not mean high expectation in other user eyes.
Otherwise would like to see more laptops comparison next time (HP, Acer, etc.)
I read in a local magazine that the Dell XPS 13 would run very hot during normal usage, especially on the "leather" part.
Is that something you noticed?
I'm allergic to fan noise. That it is quiet is for me by far the most important parameter, but it's rarely discussed. Does anyone know if the Dell Studio 17 is completely quiet under normal usage, such as word processing, surfing the internet or watching mp4 movies.
I don't really dig the 5 star system. It always seems like not all the hardware is compared equally as there never seems to be any direct comparison between one model to the other. I think all models should be weighed by features, performance and price point.
I don't really dig the 5 star system. It always seems like not all the hardware is compared equally as there never seems to be any direct comparison between one model to the other. I think all models should be weighed by features, performance and price point.
Hi Warezme--
These products aren't "directly" compared to each other. That's because each one hit the market at a different time. We couldn't compare the performance of a laptop that came out in May to one that came out in July. Each product's review was written at the time that laptop was received by us.
Thanks,
Rachel Rosmarin
Editor, Tom's Guide
That's an old Macbook Pro, what about the new one with the SD card & without the expresscard slot.
-ND
I would never buy those piece of garbage lenovo's
Worst ever laptop review, each page didn't even clearly describe spec such as cpu, chipset, HD, battery size... only subjective rating. Pathetic!
Yeah full specs should always be listed, especially when the laptops weren’t even compared head to head.
Take a look at the Dell 17 inch Studio, it seems one of the major critiques is the battery life. But when ordering that laptop you have several different CPU’s to choose from (CPU’s that differ not only in speed but also in power consumption) so depending on what the review sample was equipped with it could either spell doom for certain configurations or be less of an issue with others.
WTF no alienware!!!!!!!!
I can't believe you didn't list battery life and heat output.
I can't believe you didn't list battery life and heat output.
I need edit button.
The big Acer Aspire 18.4" would of been a good review to add.
I also would of liked a hardware comparison table with screen size, options, and comparative price.
I've got one of those MBPs. I used it today at a conference and my battery lasted for a good 5 hours. Of course, the newer MBP with SD slot is meant to be even better. As for the glossy screen, seriously, I don't see a problem with it. People complain about glare in glossy screens but, in my experience, the glare from a light source behind you is far easier to deal with than the washed out effect that a matte display has. The colours are also truly superb.
Strange there aren't any HP laptops. Or, for that matter, any Gateway, Acer or Sony laptops, considering these companies put together make up around 40% percent of the market.
I also find it strange that more advanced benchmarks were not used, considering the suite other parts go through here.
1) No specs, wtf?
2) No pricing, ehhh... (i.e. that 15" macbook costs $2000... definitely would raise a red flag for most people)
3) Some laptops are in completely different categories (gaming, portability etc.)