Download the
Tom's Guide App from the AppsStore
News and trends on internet
/ mobile / "sound & picture" / IT
Yes No

Google: Android Is Profitable for Us

- By - Source : Tech Radar

Android is making Google richer through the use of ads.

Speaking during an interview at the D: Dive Into Mobile conference, Google's VP of Engineering Andy Rubin said on Monday that the Android platform wasn't a loss-leader for Google.

Because of its open source roots, Google does not charge smartphone manufacturers to license the Android OS, however Rubin said that it's actually generating revenue due to advertising. Most of these ads are presumably found in free apps listed on the Android Market like Angry Birds, Astro File Manager and others.

"We're making money on ads generally through Android. When I was a startup there was no way I would have been profitable, my business model was completely different from what it is today," he said, referring to the days of working on the OS as Android Inc before Google acquired the company back in 2005 for an estimated $50 million.

"Now, I don't have to sell services I can just do the Google thing, which is an ad-based business model, and we are profitable," he added.

Rubin didn't toss out any specific numbers, however it's speculated that Android generates a large chunk of revenue for Google each month-- the original Angry Birds app reportedly brings home around $1 million in ad revenue per month. Analysts have predicted that the OS will generate around $5 billion in revenue by 2012.

Android has been slated as the Windows of the mobile sector, dominating a large chunk of currently available and future devices outside Apple's closed iOS realm. Android even poses as a threat to RIM thanks to the release of Motorola's DROID Pro, offering the android environment to professionals who need a high level of IT controllable security and access to a virtual private network.

Share:
20
Comments
X

Comments

Parsian 12/08/2010 2:19 AM
Hide
-7+

goddamn ****ing ads.

galeciofamily0405 12/08/2010 2:30 AM
Hide
-2+

I wonder if Toms makes money off the two clowns above with their ads LOL!

santfu 12/08/2010 2:35 AM
Hide
-4+

Tom's : going to dominate the article commenting sector with its new ad-based business model.

As for Android, I'm not surprised that its profitable. It's long passed it's critical user volume.

hikayu 12/08/2010 2:40 AM
Hide
-3+

2 things :

1) ads . is there really a point of doing these stupid ads ? better question would be : is there such a thing as a tom's reader that's stupid enough to actually click on these links ?

2) google's on a roll to world domination . nuff said .

Spirograph 12/08/2010 2:44 AM
Hide
-7+

Adblock Plus, ftw. I have no idea what you guys are talking about.

tsnorquist 12/08/2010 2:50 AM
Hide
-2+

Seriously, how hard is it to put in some deterrents for these spammers.

zachary k 12/08/2010 2:58 AM
Hide
-2+

hikayu :
2 things : 1) ads . is there really a point of doing these stupid ads ? better question would be : is there such a thing as a tom's reader that's stupid enough to actually click on these links ?2) google's on a roll to world domination . nuff said .


same thing can be said for ads on the TV, does anyone sees an ad on the TV and say "i gotta have that". some are, but more are saying "stfu and get back to my show!".

applegetsmelaid 12/08/2010 3:30 AM
Hide
-2+

Next Article -

Google: (Fill the blank) Is Profitable for Us.

gmarsack 12/08/2010 3:48 AM
Hide
-0+

It's called Captcha people!

GO GOOGLE!!!

toastninja17 12/08/2010 3:52 AM
Hide
-2+

Nawwwwww REALLY? Duh.

stardude82 12/08/2010 4:50 AM
Hide
-0+

Does Google they charge for support? That's typically how most distros make their money. They might also develop proprietary drivers.

alidan 12/08/2010 5:37 AM
Hide
-2+

zachary k :
same thing can be said for ads on the TV, does anyone sees an ad on the TV and say "i gotta have that". some are, but more are saying "stfu and get back to my show!".



ads are how i find out when games come out, or other various things without immersing myself in the worlds completely.

if you are thinking infomercial like commercials, like shamwow, slapchop, or nuwave, than yea, those are designing for impulse buyers.

yao 12/08/2010 5:40 AM
Hide
-1+

1 mil? wow..

gti88 12/08/2010 9:08 AM
Hide
-1+

I wonder, if there's an AD-blocker for Android.

Griffolion 12/08/2010 12:49 PM
Hide
-1+

I barely ever notice the Ads.

eddieroolz 12/08/2010 1:02 PM
Hide
-1+

Well, that was obvious. If it wasn't profitable it would've been canned already.

ssddx 12/08/2010 3:17 PM
Hide
-2+

ads are there to keep things free for the end user. without this sort of revenue you will be paying for it out of your own pocket. pick your poison.

about adblock: if everyone did this, the website couldnt rely on this business model anymore. I realize how annoying ads are but you're just kicking yourself in the rear you know.

guruofchem 12/08/2010 5:05 PM
Hide
-0+

My favorite ad blocker - the hunk of neurons between my ears... Brain FTW!

squallypie 12/08/2010 6:44 PM
Hide
-0+

Quote :ads are there to keep things free for the end user. without this sort of revenue you will be paying for it out of your own pocket. pick your poison.


not completely true. the advertising charges are covered by manufacturers by increasing the price of the product they've advertised. thus indirectly we pay for the ad.

its not like we would buy all that, that is advertised. but still, the charges are transferred..