I applied Tim Cook’s ‘Simplicity Rule’ to my ChatGPT prompts — and it became a masterclass in creativity
Simplicity often sparks creativity
Here at Tom’s Guide our expert editors are committed to bringing you the best news, reviews and guides to help you stay informed and ahead of the curve!
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Join the club
Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards.
As a prompt engineer, I’ve tested plenty of AI prompt strategies over the past four years. Some were clever and surprisingly useful, others were far too complicated. Despite having a prompting background, I fell into a trap of believing that better results required longer prompts, more context and highly specific instructions. But that's seldom the case.
I’ve spent the last week obsessing over my AI habits. With Tim Cook recently announcing his transition to Executive Chairman, the tech world is looking toward the John Ternus era and wondering how Apple’s legendary discipline will evolve. I decided to get ahead of the curve by leaning into the ruthless discipline Cook left behind. By applying his ‘Simplicity Rule’ to my ChatGPT prompts, I accidentally triggered a masterclass in creativity.
And while Cook didn’t invent minimalism, he has long championed clarity, focus and removing unnecessary extras that could lead to bottlenecks. Those same values helped shape Apple Inc. into one of the most user-friendly companies in the world. Instead of asking what to add, the better question is often: what can I remove?
Article continues belowI decided to apply that same mindset to my ChatGPT prompts. The result was one of the most creative AI weeks I’ve had in months.
What is Tim Cook’s ‘Simplicity Rule’?
This isn’t an official trademarked rule. It’s shorthand for a philosophy Cook often reflects in interviews, product launches and Apple’s broader design culture: simplify until only what matters remains. It's a great concept and one I've thought about a lot recently.
You can think of it this way: clear language cuts through cluttered thinking, focus beats feature overload, intuition often outperforms unnecessary complexity and refinement wins over excess.
In prompt terms, this means cutting the fluff and asking for the essence of what you want. Simply put, my old way of prompting was doing too much.
Here’s the kind of prompt I might have written: Act as a world-class creative strategist and award-winning marketer. Generate 10 highly innovative campaign ideas for a wellness brand targeting busy millennial parents. Make them emotional, humorous, memorable and optimized for social media engagement.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
It sounds smart and it's certainly thorough, but with ChatGPT-5.4 or ChatGPT-5.5, it's overkill. The new models are much better at inferring intent, handling ambiguity and filling in missing context than older generations. In other words, you often don’t need to micromanage the model anymore.
Here’s the simplified version I tested instead: Give me 10 fresh campaign ideas for a wellness brand aimed at busy parents.
Easy enough, faster to write and the responses were sharper.
Why simpler prompts worked better
Tim Cook’s approach to simplicity can be especially powerful for creativity because creativity usually thrives under clarity. While many people assume more inputs, more instructions and more complexity lead to better ideas, the opposite is often true because too much noise can suffocate original thinking.
So, when you overload a prompt, brief or brainstorm with too many rules, you narrow the possible outcomes. Simplicity leaves open space for surprising connections.
For example, and overcomplicated prompt might look like: “Generate 10 emotionally resonant, Gen Z-friendly, high-converting campaign ideas with viral potential.”
Yet, a simpler prompt for ChatGPT works better because it is clear and staright to the point: “Give me 10 fresh campaign ideas Gen Z would notice.”
The second version gives AI more freedom to be inventive. And don't worry, the newer models can handle it far better than ChatGPT-4o every could.
Another way to think about Cook’s style is that it often meant stripping away distractions and asking what really matters. That same principle helps creativity because strong ideas usually solve one clear problem well.
With this philosophy, instead of asking for ten layers, simply ask, what's the real hook here? What would make someone care about my startup/project/novel? What's the simplest version of this idea? What's the essence or core of the idea that matters?
When you start there, you'll discover sharper concepts grow. Many creative blocks are not talent problems, they just need a clear starting point.
Applied to ChatGPT creativity
Many iconic products, ads and stories are memorable because they are easy to grasp instantly. Simplicity doesn’t mean shallow, it means distilled. And that's been a hallmark of Apple Inc. products: remove distraction so the main experience shines. Apple encourages creativity and risk-taking throughout the company by allowing employees to dive into new ideas without fear of failure.
When this concept it applied to ChatGPT-5.4, this means shorter prompts outperform sprawling ones. Cleaner prompts often lead to livelier outputs, which ultimately spark new ideas. Don't be afraid to lean on AI to brainstorm, because you may discover that your simple prompt leads to big ideas.
The takeaway
Tim Cook’s “way” is better for creativity because makes space for better ideas to appear. After dozens of tests using the simplicity rule, I noticed my ideas were better thought out, which meant I could easily explain them. They were no longer just "big ideas" but tangible ones.
But for me, the biggest lesson here was that complexity isn't impressive. Simplicity often outperforms over-engineering and excess. That applies to prompts, writing, meetings, products and even daily decisions. We often add because it feels productive. Real skill is knowing what to remove.
Applying Tim Cook’s simplicity mindset to my ChatGPT prompts didn’t make them weaker, it made them better. The more I removed, the more creative the outputs became. Give this a try if your current prompts feel repetitive, overcooked or generic, and let me know in the comments how this concept worked for you.
Follow Tom's Guide on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds.
More from Tom's Guide
- I let Gemini scan my messy fridge photos to plan my meals — and I saved $150 this month
- I asked ChatGPT to use Charlie Munger’s ‘Inversion rule' to rethink my goals — and it beat every productivity app
- I asked ChatGPT to use Elon Musk’s ‘Relevance Rule’ to fix my memory — and I’m never going back to notes

Amanda Caswell is one of today’s leading voices in AI and technology. A celebrated contributor to various news outlets, her sharp insights and relatable storytelling have earned her a loyal readership. Amanda’s work has been recognized with prestigious honors, including outstanding contribution to media.
Known for her ability to bring clarity to even the most complex topics, Amanda seamlessly blends innovation and creativity, inspiring readers to embrace the power of AI and emerging technologies. As a certified prompt engineer, she continues to push the boundaries of how humans and AI can work together.
Beyond her journalism career, Amanda is a long-distance runner and mom of three. She lives in New Jersey.
You must confirm your public display name before commenting
Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.
