Pico Pro Performance Results

By Ed Tittel, published on February 21, 2008
Source: Tom's Guide US | Keywords: , | Themes: Laptops and Notebooks, Networking, The Internet

6. Pico Pro Performance Results

Two major contributing factors to degradation of desktop and notebook performance come from adware/spyware/malware infestation and corresponding protective countermeasures. Your computer must work overtime just to get through the day’s business while battling an onslaught of malicious software vying for control of your computing environment. Yoggie’s Pico security platform restores balance and order to the PC computing environment. It offloads most (but certainly not all) of the complex processing and resource-intensive tasks involved with handling potentially malicious network traffic, while enabling the PC’s processor to focus on general computing tasks. In fact, only the third-party software components included in the Pico environment (most notably, Kaspersky items) require any CPU cycles on the host PC. For the Pico itself, tighter integration between its applications and runtime platform also enable a more efficient signature and software update path than is typical for PC desktop applications and updates.

In general, starting up the Pico is quick. Most of our start-ups fell somewhere between 40 and 50 seconds after we jumped the first-time start-up hurdle. By comparison, our Windows XP notebook took over 1:30 to boot up, and our Vista desktop routinely chunked away for just under 2:00 before starting up. Except for occasional page loading delays (which we’ve seen happen when IE’s anti-phishing filter kicks into overdrive on the desktop as well), the Pico really didn’t appear to get in our way when performing various types of Internet access (email, Web surfing and FTP connections, primarily).

When using the Pico, there is no perceptible slow-down in surfing activity. Occasionally, content-heavy pages appear to pause as they are inspected for cleanliness, only to suddenly burst into view. However, our instrumentation showed no significant drop in either throughput or performance. In fact, much to our surprise, the Pico seemed to actually exhibit better network performance in some of our informal testing. Occasional initial page load delays may be unsettling for some, but we find the apparent (though negligible) performance penalty as a much welcome alternative to browsing carelessly at full-speed-and at full-risk. In the security realm, you tend to sacrifice convenience and luxury (but never liberty) to obtain additional safety, so this experience is entirely predictable.

That said, we did observe a measurable increase in network latency (from the tens to hundreds of milliseconds), a difference that is completely imperceptible to humans, matched with an unusual increase in download speeds (upload speeds appear relatively unaffected). We can only speculate, but these results suggest that some kind of packet prioritization or traffic shaping may be occurring transparently inside the Pico itself.

Table 1-1: Notebook network performance test with the Yoggie Pico Pro disabled.

Upload Download Latency
473 kbps 6441 kbps 17 ms
466 kbps 6644 kbps 12 ms
476 kbps 6671 kbps 14 ms
433 kbps 6557 kbps 13 ms

Table 1-2: Notebook network performance test with Yoggie Pico Pro enabled.

Upload Download Latency
493 kbps 7937 kbps 143 ms
483 kbps 7178 kbps 118 ms
488 kbps 8173 kbps 132 ms
473 kbps 7910 kbps 123 ms

Table 1-3: Desktop network performance test with Yoggie Pico Pro disabled.

Upload Download Latency
401 kbps 6469 kbps 40 ms
418 kbps 6558 kbps 42 ms
423 kbps 6368 kbps 35 ms
423 kbps 6436 kbps 39 ms

Table 1-4: Desktop network performance test with Yoggie Pico Pro enabled.

Upload Download Latency
477 kbps 8064 kbps 164 ms
462 kbps 7938 kbps 158 ms
473 kbps 7782 kbps 142 ms
468 kbps 7944 kbps 155 ms

Roughly half of the processing burden for most tasks (IDS, firewall, content filtration and scanning engines) occurs on the Pico Pro except for Kaspersky spyware and virus filtering, which is split between the Pico Pro and a desktop or notebook PC. Give the Pico Pro its due-that isn’t a bad thing by any means. We experienced no performance issues even when surfing inside multiple windows laden with media-rich content, other than a few initial pauses loading some of these pages; otherwise, our surfing experience wasn’t dramatically altered in any way.

Comments | Print | Send to a friend

Google Ads

Comments


Deleted profile 02/21/2008 9:59 AM
Hide
-0+
Nice, although running an OS that's actually secure (i.e. not windows) would certainly give you most of the same benefits...
Deleted profile 02/22/2008 2:04 AM
Hide
-0+
Right... because OSX, all the Linux Distros, and BSD all come out of the box preconfigured with up to date antivirus, anti-spyware, traffic shaping, intrusion detection, and content filtering.

Or wait... maybe you're just saying that those OSes are all completely secure and don't need anything else... riiiiiight.
Deleted profile 02/22/2008 3:37 AM
Hide
-0+
seems like a neat device, did you do any surfing to nether regions of the internet to see what kind of infections it could actally block?

That bit published by Google that malware can install just by visting a site is rather disturbing. Downloading and running a malware program is one thing, but just clicking on a link and getting infected should be blocked by a device like this. Does the pico block such attackS?

Or do I need to maintain my clean and dirty setups. One setup is only for known good sites or offline activity and it is unplugged while the dirty setup is online. Normally the dirty setup is clean, but the anti-virus software has been eaten before.
Deleted profile 02/22/2008 7:22 AM
Hide
-0+
I purchased 2 of the Pico's (from Yoggie.com) which arrived yesterday. I bought it through their website because they have a promo right now where you get a 3 year license included in the purchase price. The setup and install went just like the review states - perfectly. Not a single problem and it went very quickly (I didn't get the certificate error like the reviewer).

My laptop performance after the install is way beyond what I had expected. Before installing the Pico, opening an Excel spreadsheet from a LAN drive took over 1 minute (with Norton 360 installed). After the Pico install and uninstall of Norton, opening the same Excel document took less than 5 seconds!!! Another performance boost that I noticed was when I wake up my laptop (after about 30 min of inactivity) - it used to take a long time to fully wake up to the point where it was usable again (at lease a min or more - depending on how long it was inactive), where it is virtually instantaneous now.

I've been raving about this little device all day. So far, it ranks among my top 2 gadget purchases ever (right along side my Harmony Remote).

I highly recommend it.
Deleted profile 02/24/2008 9:02 AM
Hide
-0+
I would be interested in finding out of two computers on the same switch are effected by the USB device. Sometimes I transfer documents between computers on the same network and I would think USB speeds are a lot slower than the Gigabit network interface cards.

Note You are going to post a comment as anonymous.



Google Ads