Source: Tom's Guide US | Keywords: celestron, telescope | Themes: Digital Entertainment, Digital Cameras
- 1. Celestron NexStar 6SE
- 2. Common Telescope Types
- 3. Telescope Mounts
- 4. Recommended Books
- 5. Celestron's Telescopes
- 6. The NexStar 6 SE
- 7. SkyAlign
- 8. Viewing
- 9. NexStar 6 SE Conclusions
- 10. Celestron SkyScout
- 11. Alignment and Testing
- 12. SkyScout Accessories
- 13. SkyScout Use Tests
- 14. SkyScout Conclusions
- 15. VistaPix IS70, a Spotting Telescope and Camera
- 16. VistaPix Use Tests
- 17. VistaPix IS70 Conclusions
- 18. More on this topic
15. VistaPix IS70, a Spotting Telescope and Camera
Too often I have been fooled by advertisements that offer inexpensive binoculars with an integrated digital camera, where the camera turns out to be mounted to the binoculars, but doesn’t use the binocular lens at all. These devices are completely useless. Celestron’s VistaPix IS70 marries a 70 mm refractor spotting telescope (14x) with a digital camera. Combined magnification is a whopping 24x. This is a very high quality lens, but the digital camera and scope function is unlike most other cameras. Much of the VistaPix’s outside is also nicely finished in armored rubber.
Let me begin with the two most unusual features. A top mounted sliding switch selects low or high power. This switches between the camera to the left, or the large lens at the center and right side.
On the VistaPix IS70, note the lens selector and remote shutter attachment I attached.
Remember to remove both lens covers! You also need to focus both the camera and spotting scope if you use both lenses. Focusing the large lens is done with a knurled knob on the right of the camera body.
The VistaPix IS70 uses a knurled wheel, left in this picture, to focus the long lens
Focusing the camera (7X) is done by moving the focus ring on the camera lens. An electronic focus aid bar and number display in the flip top LCD display is the only way I could focus. In my hands, the screen itself wasn’t suitable for any focusing, and I found I achieved better focus by using the focus aid rather than looking through the eyepiece, which is set at 14X. The focus knob is a little stiff, and the power selector feels like you are moving a mirror. Total camera magnification through the spotting scope is an amazing 24X, without the digital zoom of 6X.
Beneath the LCD screen is a 5-touch button layout for navigating the menu. Three additional buttons control selection or back space of menu items or magnification, depending on context, and display verbosity.
The VistaPix IS70 Photo menu and control buttons
Shutter and power are activated by separate black buttons below the touch buttons. Though black on black is not readily visible, these buttons have a better feel than the touch screen buttons-that’s because a fair amount of force is necessary to activate the menu buttons. Also, I am not used to pushing a flat shutter button positioned where my hand does not naturally fall. This shutter button is nothing like the old Olympus XA touch membrane, either. Because of this and movement sensitivity at high power, Celestron includes a short 6” remote shutter button that plugs into the socket bay beneath the eyepiece. That bay also includes an external power socket, and the SD card slot.
Internal power is provided by 2 AA batteries, and the IS70 has 32 MB of internal memory. A second socket bay below the focusing knob houses a mini-USB out connector and a TV out receptacle. The VistaPix kit also includes software to stitch panoramic scenes together, a user guide, warranty card (there’s a two year warranty), a USB cable, and a TV/video out cable, all packed in an outstanding hard-sided aluminum case with fitted foam to safeguard the camera. Eye relief is a good 13 mm.
Menu choices are mostly intuitive, but somewhat limited. The one menu selection I found to be unintuitive is that to get to the top level menu, you must pick the down/mode button rather than the menu button. If you push the menu button, you only get choices for that mode-in this case, photo mode. Using the down/mode button, you can choose Photo, Setup, Video or Playback.
The maximum resolution is 3.1 megapixels, but you can save interpolated images at 5 MP. Other menu choices are pretty much self explanatory. You can shoot VGA video at 30 or 15 frames per second. One really neat feature is the ability to automatically shoot timed pictures at an interval from 10 seconds to 30 minutes, until manually stopped. Exposure value is adjustable from +/- 0.5 to +/- 2.0. You can also select normal color, sepia or black & white for each mode, photo or video.
The tripod socket has three positions on the base, which is on a rotating ring around the lens. You need to use a tripod with this camera! Why? The VistaPix is also heavy, weighing 3.5 lbs, and movement is amplified with the high power lens. The large lens cap on the main lens has no attachment to the camera, unlike the camera lens cover. That large lens cap does have an odd removable cap within the lens cover. When split, that cap is designed to reduce exposure, the equivalent of increasing the f-stop.
- VistaPix IS70 Spotting...
- Previous page SkyScout Conclusions
- Next page VistaPix Use Tests

GoTo mounts are for lazy people who don't really understand the essence of observing the sky. It's certainly a fun thing to create if you are an engineer, but if you're considering using one, take my advice and buy a book with pictures of the Messier catalog, it's a lot cheaper. A true amateur astronomer never uses those revolting, despicable, hideous GoTo mounts. Get a real standard equatorial mount. Get a good sky atlas. Get a pair of quality binoculars. Know your sky! That's astronomy...
A sensitive topic to be sure. But the point of the article was to encourage those who have an interest in astronomy but never bit the bullet. That is, they don't own a scope because they aren't willing to learn all that needs to be done to find stuff. OK, even lazy. And our readers totally grok computers.
Many amateurs started by using a GoTo. IMHO, the more astronomers the better. Talking to denizens of LAAS and reading cloudyskies.com, there is little sense of elitism. All amateurs are welcome, even and esp. those with GoTos.
I didn't have room to talk about the wedges that covert yoke mounts to equatorial mounts, but they exist for many yoke types. That way you can have the best of both worlds.
Finally, one of the books I recommended does just what you suggest: tries to teach the night sky so you can find stuff without using (or even using) a GoTo. Hope this addresses your comments.
Doug
I think the guys who say to get a star chart and spend 6 months learning how to find and track things are missing the point and living in the 19th century.
The fact is that these new generations of scopes make astronomy so much more accessible to people who find astronomy interesting but don't have the time or ability to invest. They also make it simple to introduce new people to astronomy by quickly showing them lots of interesting things.
Plus, as a computer geek, there is nothing more fun than plugging your telescope into your laptop, hooking up a camera and driving it around from your computer. Do an easy DIY project like adapting a webcam to use with the scope and you have yourself tons of fun *and* you learn the night sky, you just don't waste months of time trying to figure out how to see anything.
I totally agree with smurfdog - you spend more time observing and imaging objects than trying to find them - and most of them are very dim anyways. THe manual method of finding objects is definitely 19th century stuff.
Science is ever changing and self-correcting. To memorize the sky from Earth is one thing and to explore the universe is another. Technology makes Astronomy possible for all who are willing to learn and grow. Why not use both to your advantage.
Doug,
I really praise the point of your article. I also love to teach everything I know about the topic to anyone who's interested in the subject, like most amateurs.
Like you said, there's no to little sense of elitism in those groups. But I also know this: Like all the really rewarding things in life, Astronomy requires persistence and solid interest.
I decided to comment your article since I disagree on some things you wrote and that contrast may help people who read it, look at the picture from another angle.
Trying to find Deep Sky Objects or the planets (very easy with little experience and knowledge) in the sky, is where most of the fun is! Having a computer doing it for you is like you own a Porsche and let a chauffeur drive you. The only difference here is that, unlike the chauffeur, the computer has no fun at all!
I didn't find anything interesting on cloudyskies.com, apparently is just a domain for sale. Did you mean www.cloudynights.com?
If your interest is solid, you've got nothing to fear, understanding the sky is a lot easier than most people think.
Diogo.
Diogo et al,
My bad! Yes of course I meant www.cloudynights.com. It's a great site for advice, and mostly cogent tips on purchasing and use.
I think we can agree that for some, starting with GoTos is a great way of getting into astronomy. Then you can progress to star charts and maps, relying less on the GoTo. I want to encourage people to begin this exciting hobby.
Amateur astronomers are one of the few science disciplines where amatuers can and do make professional level contributions!
And even though I understand how the SkyScout works, it is unbelievable to actually use it and watch it ID an object, or have it guide you to some random star in its database...Awesome product. For me, this really helped me better learn the night sky. It's like using a crutch (or a chaffeur) then weaning yourself away from it and driving yourself. Much less pain, and kick butt fun.
Hope this answers your concerns.
Clear skies!
Doug
Doug,
I am a beginner in the field of astronomy and astrophotography and I would like to purchase some equiptment. Im not exactly sure what types of telescopes and astrophotography equiptment would be best for a beginner and it would be great if you could offer me some advice. I have done a lot of research on telescopes preferably under $500 and CCD cameras along with laptops. If you have any advice that would be great! Thanks.