Nintendo Faces Second Patent Infringement Suit Over Controllers

By Jane McEntegart, published on August 21, 2008 at 6:30 PM
Source: Tom's Guide | Keywords: , , , | Themes: Digital Entertainment, Business
Syndication: Add to your Google homepage Add to My Yahoo!

Nintendo faces a second patent infringement suit for it’s controllers following a suit filed by a Rockville-based company called Hillcrest Labs.

A couple of weeks back, Nintendo was in court for allegedly infringing on patents belonging to Anascape Inc. All three major console manufacturers were named in the case and while Microsoft and Sony decided to settle out of court, Nintendo’s decision to see the case through to the bitter end saw the company slapped with a bill of 21 million for damages.

Nintendo plans to appeal the decision however if Anascape were to win, the case would not effect the Wiimote, only the Gamecube controller (which isn’t produced anymore) and the Wii Classic controller. This week, Nintendo encounters a lawsut which could see a ruling demanding the company to cease imports of the Wii console to the United States.

Hillcrest Labs says its technology allows users replace the conventional remote they use with their cable boxes with something similar to the Wiimote. In other words, more waving about than pressing buttons. The company claims Nintendo’s Wiimote infringes on Hillcrest patents and filed suit with the International Trade Commission. If the ITC rules in Hillcrest’s favor, it could move to block imports of the Japanese manufacturer’s popular console.

While Nintendo quite readily gave comment regarding last month’s lawsuit (announcing the planned to appeal the ruling), the same spokesperson responded to the Washington Post’s request for comment this time around and said the company didn’t know anything about the suit.

"We have not been served with any lawsuit or other action by Hillcrest and therefore have no comment."

A lot of people might think that this kind of thing is just money grabbing trying to cash in on Nintendo’s success with the Wii, however Hillcrest is not short of cash especially as of late. The company recently licensed its technology to Logitech and back in January announced it had attracted $50 million in venture capital funding.

(Via The Washington Post)

Comments | Print | Send to a friend

Sponsored links

Comments

Anonymous 08/22/2008 1:04 AM
Hide
-2+
the last resort 08/22/2008 1:16 AM
Hide
-1+

^^agreed. these companies should go away.

Anonymous 08/22/2008 2:20 AM
Hide
--1+

FUCK HILLCREST SIDEWAYS AND BACKWARDS

Anonymous 08/22/2008 2:33 AM
Hide
-2+

If they were to win blocking imports of Nintendo Wii to the US im sure they wouldnt be around much longer. They would probably be boycotted to hell and there headquarters burned to the ground by angry wii fans.

Anonymous 08/22/2008 3:16 AM
Hide
--1+

Wii fans don't even have the age to light up a match, Hillcrest will be fine!

jarnail24 08/22/2008 3:25 AM
Hide
--1+

real men don't play wii.

jaragon13 08/22/2008 3:33 AM
Hide
--1+

jarnail24 :
real men don't play wii.


No,but women love to play your wii.

ravenware 08/22/2008 3:34 AM
Hide
-0+

This is kind of silly and couldn't gyration turn around and sue for the same thing?

reddozen 08/22/2008 4:17 AM
Hide
--1+




do your research...
http://www.hillcrestlabs.com/

They are currently licensing they're product to Logitech, thus it's not just a sitting patent, and the company is actively lending it's ideas for money. Nintendo needs to man up and pay their dues. It's unfair to both Logitech and Hillcrest Labs. Like it or not, if it's true, Nintendo broke the law, and has to pay the consequences.

jarnail24 :
real men don't play wii.


Amen!
lol

lobhob 08/22/2008 4:51 AM
Hide
-1+

Nintendo dont owe them anything. They obviously didn't copy off them because, well, THERE ARE SO MANY F***ING PATENTS ON THE SAME THING. MORE THEN ONE PERSON THOUGHT OF THE SAME IDEA, IT HAPPENS ALL THE TIME.
The End.

frozenlead 08/22/2008 5:48 AM
Hide
-1+

I patented the english language just now. seems noone else did.

ALL OF YOU OWE ME.

ravenware 08/22/2008 5:48 AM
Hide
-0+

I guess gyration wouldn't be the same thing. The patent from hillcrest is in relation to "3D pointing devices" But there are several claims listed in the patent. I would be interested to see what area of the patent hillcrest felt nintendo violated. There are several specific indications about how the sensors and accelrometers work but; the claim "19. The system of claim 1, wherein said handheld device is a 3D pointing device. " is too broad.
There is also the problem that there seems to be no hard product that was developed using this technology before the development of the Wii.
So how is Nintendo to know that some company has a patent on 3d pointing devices? I recall something about the loop in '06 but I am sure that nintendo began dev before then.

Cool link:
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph [...] PN/7414611

biohazard420420 08/22/2008 5:57 AM
Hide
-1+

RAVENWARE :
the claim "19. The system of claim 1, wherein said handheld device is a 3D pointing device. " is too broad.



I agree by that definition even a laser pointer infringes on their patent or even those handheld mice for power point presentations. I think there should be a limit on just how broad a patent can be and this is a perfect example.

Anonymous 08/22/2008 6:29 AM
Hide
-1+

Everyone look out! Hillcrest is going to sue anyone with an index finger!

/run

Comments are closed on this page.

Sponsored links