Download the
Tom's Guide App from the AppsStore
News and trends on internet
/ mobile / "sound & picture" / IT
Yes No

Google Improves Buzz Based on User Feedback

- By - Source : Tom's Guide US

Late yesterday afternoon, Google updated its Gmail blog to inform users of a few changes in Buzz, the search giant's new micro-blogging effort.

Buzz has only been live for a few days, but soon after the service launched, users found fault with the privacy settings, or lack there of. When Google sets you up with Buzz, it gives you people to to follow based on the people you email and chat to the most. This is the same system used for decided who appears in your gchat list.

However, although this is handy, people quickly found fault with this feature when it was combined with the openness of Buzz. By default, Google showed the world who your were following and who was following you via your Google profile. There's an option to turn this off, but because it's buried in the user's Google profile settings, not many people can actually find it or even know it exists. This means anyone who can find their way to your public Google profile can see who you email and chat to the most. Not exactly a good place to be in if you're in the business of confidential sources or have anything else you'd like to keep on the down-low.

Google yesterday announced that it had moved the "display my followers and who I'm following" check box to a more frontal location, allowing people to easily switch it off.

The company has also added the ability to block someone who has started following you, another thing that people had been a little iffy on. Previously, you were only able to block people from following you after they had created a public profile. Now, you can block anyone, regardless of whether or not they've already created profiles for themselves.

Lastly, Google has separated who's actually following you, and who will be following you by default, once they get a Google profile. Before, you'd see your list of followers all in one, even if two people on that list did not have a Google profile. People without a Google profile do not appear on your public profile in the list of people you are following.

Do you think these changes are enough to pacify freaked out users? Let us know in the comments below.

Share:
9
Comments
X

Comments

tomtompiper 02/12/2010 12:56 PM
Hide
-2+

Should the headline not have been.

"Google fixes fuck ups."

This is not cosmetic changes to please customers, this is fixing major security flaws.

Diabolix 02/12/2010 1:25 PM
Hide
-0+

WP google

Anonymous 02/12/2010 4:20 PM
Hide
-4+

It was just released, everything has problems. Typically that's why people release BETAs.. but you don't really release a BETA social network do you? They fixed the problem so how is it a fuck up? More of a "BETA" problem, that got fixed during the early release of the service.

So, gratz Google on yet another service that you offer. I'm sure that a lot of people will use it. :). I personally probably won't use it just because I'm not that big of a social networker.

doomtomb 02/12/2010 4:40 PM
Hide
-1+

Well I guess this proves Google is committed to their social network they are creating. Good news overall.

juanc 02/12/2010 5:22 PM
Hide
-1+

It just shows up on your Gmail and you can't control who follows you, you don't have options to DISABLE it, you are not asked to Accept people. You just can "Turn it off" which only takes it out from the screen but it seems everything keeps going underneath.

Pretty OPEN...

Anonymous 02/12/2010 7:05 PM
Hide
-0+

Internet social networking is a very double-edged sword, to be sure! I hate the publicity of it, but I like hearing from friends and family whom I generally wouldn't hear much from.

JohnnyLucky 02/12/2010 8:53 PM
Hide
-0+

You mean Google actually listens to users?

mayne92 02/13/2010 1:01 AM
Hide
-0+

JohnnyLucky :
You mean Google actually listens to users?


Why so sore? You cried and Google didn't listen?

shoelessinsight 02/13/2010 5:49 AM
Hide
-0+

This was a mistake on Google's part only because it was automatically rolled out to Gmail users without prior consent on their part. Had the beta been opt-in then it wouldn't have been nearly as upsetting when problems like this arose.

When someone signs up onto a social networking site, they should expect that their information will be at least somewhat public (that is the whole idea, after all). But when someone signs up for email, they don't expect the whole world to be able to see into their private lives.