Source: Tom's Guide US | Keywords: ibuypower, gaming, pc | Themes: Desktop Computers, Digital Entertainment
7. Productivity Benchmarks
Winrar, curiously, seems to favor the Dell’s increased clock speed over the iBuypower’s four processor cores.
Both Adobe Acrobat and Photoshop favored the dual-core Dell over the quad-core Phenom. We were frankly surprised by this, as we had assumed that Adobe software would take advantage of the Phenom’s quad-core architecture.
Deep Fritz shows a notable advantage for the Phenom processor.
- Previous page 3D Rendering Benchmarks
- Next page Game Benchmarks





Check out this test at behardware:
http://www.behardware.com/articles [...] hmark.html
1 core: 3.5 fps
2 cores: 6.6
3 cores: 12.9
4 cores: 13.1
The third core still doubled the FPS!
What are you talking about? To me it's pretty clear that the Dell outperformed the iBuyPower rig and in some cases by a far margin. Even at higher resultions where the ATI card is supposed the shine it's not like it beat down the Dell. One thing to keep in mind is that those who are looking for a low end gaming rig are not going to have 24"+ sized monitors to run the high resolutions that it would take to get performance better than the dell. Plus, the dell is cheaper.
I kind of think the conclusion here was really taking it easy on iBuyPower. Honestly they're going to have to work harder to come up with something that is truely competitve in the market.