Source: Tom's Guide US | Keywords: ibuypower, gaming, pc | Themes: Desktop Computers, Digital Entertainment
5. Media Encoding / Playback Benchmarks


We see a similar story with the iTunes and lame audio encoding benchmarks, with the dual-core Dell beating out the quad-core iBuypower system. However, the Windows Media Encoder 9 benchmark clearly shows quad-core optimizations and the iBuypower system walks away with top honors.

HD playback surprisingly shows no difference whatsoever between the iBuypower and Dell systems for CPU utilization when playing back an HD video file.


CloneDVD and TMPG 4 video encoding benchmarks show a slight advantage for the Dell system, suggesting that these are not applications that will take advantage of more than two CPU cores. However, Mainconcept H.264 is clearly an application that will utilize four cores, and the Phenom processor in the Gamer Mage takes the win.
- Previous page Synthetic Benchmarks
- Next page 3D Rendering Benchmarks


Check out this test at behardware:
http://www.behardware.com/articles [...] hmark.html
1 core: 3.5 fps
2 cores: 6.6
3 cores: 12.9
4 cores: 13.1
The third core still doubled the FPS!
What are you talking about? To me it's pretty clear that the Dell outperformed the iBuyPower rig and in some cases by a far margin. Even at higher resultions where the ATI card is supposed the shine it's not like it beat down the Dell. One thing to keep in mind is that those who are looking for a low end gaming rig are not going to have 24"+ sized monitors to run the high resolutions that it would take to get performance better than the dell. Plus, the dell is cheaper.
I kind of think the conclusion here was really taking it easy on iBuyPower. Honestly they're going to have to work harder to come up with something that is truely competitve in the market.