3. eStarling Impact 7, $99
It would be easy to describe the Impact 7 as merely a much cheaper version of the Parrot frame. Basically, that’s what it is: it connects to Wi-Fi, it works with social photo sites, and photos can be emailed to it. And it costs 20% of the Parrot frame’s price. But the Impact 7 beats the Parrot in some ways, and is lacking the Parrot’s high quality in other areas.
To begin with, the design of this frame, while decent, is not nearly as polished as the Parrot frame. The piano black finish of the Impact 7 is nice, but the mechanism for plugging in and standing up the frame isn’t easy. The kick stand flops around and doesn’t stay put, making the frame feel wobbly when upright. The AC adaptor’s plug is almost impossible to find, nestled into the groove on the left hand side behind the stand. However, unlike the Parrot, this frame comes with a remote control so you can manipulate it from the couch.
Once plugged in, the frame powers up and a previously invisible set of blue LED touch-sensitive icons appears. They’re not exactly buttons, but if you touch them (arrows that distinguish between back, forward, enter, etc.), they light up and respond.
Setting up Wi-Fi on the eStarling is much the same as on the Parrot—the process of laboriously entering the hex WEP code on a virtual keyboard via arrow buttons is painstaking. But, once the job is done, a screen pops up telling you a URL and login code. This site, accessible from any computer—not just one on the network with your frame—is the key to eStarling’s system.
When you go to the URL and activate your frame, you end up registering your e-mail address, time zone, and user name. This username creates your own site and email address. Yourname@seeframe.com. You can give out this address to anyone that you want to share photos on your frame. The Time Zone setting tells the frame when to turn off (typically between 2am and 4am local time, for firmware updates and resets).
But there are many other ways of getting photos on this frame beyond the e-mail address. Everything
you can do on the Parrot frame you can also do here, though the public album problem persists with Flickr and Picasa (eStarling says private albums are permitted, but we couldn’t discern how). In addition, you can bring RSS feeds of album accounts at places like Photobucket, AOL, and even Facebook . eStarling provides feeds from other photo sources as well, such as National Geographic images.
Through this web-based interface, you can also edit photos with captions and create other amusing effects.
The most fun we had with the Impact 7 was with an iPhone (or any other phone that takes photos and sends them via email). Taking pictures on the phone and instantly emailing them from the frame was instantly gratifying—the photos showed up immediately.
For only $99, there has to be a downside. The Impact 7’s screen resolution is a widescreen 460x234, rather than the standard photo size which is not widescreen. That means most photos on the frame can’t take advantage of the widescreen shape and end up displaying truncated versions of themselves. eStarling sells an Impact 8 with an 800x600 resolution that resolves this problem, but it costs nearly twice as much.
But even though some pictures don’t fit perfectly in the screen, the screen itself is bright (though not nearly as crisp and detailed as the Parrot frame).
eStarling allows groups of people who each have one of these frames to share the same e-mail address so everyone in the group gets the same photo updates on their frames. The photos from any frame can also be accessed and displayed online via a “virtual frame.”
- 1. Frames of the Future
- 2. Parrot Specchio Frame, $500
- 3. eStarling Impact 7, $99
- 4. Westinghouse DPF-1411, $168
- 5. Kodak OLED Wireless Frame, $999

Its amazing how fragile technology is getting. Back in the day them black and white pictures were tough, and always there. Now, our pictures are all digital, on digital frames, etc. If we have a large war that wipes out all technology, we lose so much.. even our own pictures.. The more technology we get, the more fragile our society and way of living becomes.
I fail to see the point. I take pictures at 8MP (3264 x 2448) in RAW format then post-process them. I Think that resolutions and sizes discussed above are worthless. With such sizes even a bad picture would look sharp. I take Macro pictures of insects and enjoy looking at hidden details; which such small resolutions this is impossible.
$3 for an 12" x 18" print seems like a much more suitable solution.
NOTE: why hasn't someone just sold a regular 19" LCD display in a frame with some memory for $300. It would be much more feasible then.
I've owned 4 different frames over the past 3 years; they keep getting better. The most recent purchase, a Pandigital 10" frame ($165 or so at my local Costco) is fantastic. The screen is the best I've seen, very vibrant and easy to see at multiple angles. It doesn't have built in wireless...I'm anxious to try the Samsung SPF-83V wireless frame when I can see it local.
I agree, with the first poster, this is the most unneeded tech out there. Think of the waste produced to make these, the electricity it takes to keep it powered, and yes, the fragility of the data in such a format. I still think that photos worth framing, should be printed on a quality paper and framed in a legitimate frame.
IMO, it is far more costly for a person to run slide-shows on a computer than it would be to have it on a digital frame. One way or the other (lcd or Paper) resources will be used & the potential for waste will always exist. A digital frame has multiple advantages that can be perceived as advantageous on other levels that I can cite if anyone really cares.
Paper is great, but it doesn't change like a dynamic slideshow. Computer-screen slideshows are great, but many people don't keep a computer in the living room (yet). That's why people like digital photo frames--they are entertaining to watch, and they fit in with the decor.
Rachel Rosmarin, Editor of Tom's Guide