Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Cards Against Humanity Donates $70,000 to Wikipedia

By - Source: Cards Against Humanity | B 16 comments

That should please Mr. Wales.

If you use the internet with any amount of regularity, chances are you've noticed the Wikimedia Foundation's appeal for donations. The foundation has reached out to users for monetary donations in the past and its current campaign employs yellow banners that move as you scroll down the page. Now, you may ignore these, or even donate $5 or $10 (or the recommended $3), but the makers of popular card game 'Cards Against Humanity' decided to help the folks at Wikimedia out with a fairly substantial donation.

A few weeks back, Cards Against Humanity announced plans for a special holiday expansion pack that it would sell on a 'pay what you want' basis. The company explained how much it would cost to make and ship each unit ($3), but encouraged users to pay whatever they wanted for the expansion pack. This week, CAH released the results of its 'pay what you want' holiday expansion pack program.

The company revealed that they made $295,831.10 after credit card fees. This, less the cost of production and shipping ($225,762.63), left them with a total of $70,066.27 in profit. The company then decided to donate this money to Wikipedia.

"We've made a $70,066.27 contribution to the Wikimedia Foundation, which runs Wikipedia," the company wrote. "Wikipedia is very important to us because without it we would not have known the exact volume of a dose of fresh boar sperm or graduated college."

While it might sound crazy, Cards Against Humanity is known for its unique business model. The company already makes a version of its game available in downloadable PDF format under a Creative Commons license and offers instructions on how to make your own version for free. It offers this 'Download for Free' option right next to the 'Buy for $25' button.

For a handy breakdown of which states paid the most for the expansion pack as well as information on what the Cards Against Humanity crew could have spent their $70k in profit on, hit up their holiday stats page.

Contact Us for News Tips, Corrections and Feedback

Display 16 Comments.
This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 10 Hide
    hydac7 , December 18, 2012 7:06 PM
    Good , they did good :) 
  • 10 Hide
    jaquith , December 18, 2012 8:03 PM
    Hey, I've donated to Wikipedia because I both use and contribute content. Wikipedia IMHO is the best single online source for information that is concise, organized, and up to date plus it's ad-free.

    So kudos to Cards Against Humanity and many thanks! :) 
Other Comments
  • -9 Hide
    Anonymous , December 18, 2012 7:05 PM
    The should have been "graduated FROM college". Apparently, they didn't take English.
  • 10 Hide
    hydac7 , December 18, 2012 7:06 PM
    Good , they did good :) 
  • 3 Hide
    kawininjazx , December 18, 2012 7:12 PM
    At least I get to see that sweet naked elbow thumbnail every time I head down to the comment section...
  • -2 Hide
    -Jackson , December 18, 2012 7:40 PM
    SethmeisterGThe should have been "graduated FROM college". Apparently, they didn't take English.

    They*
    Also, you don't put a double space after a period. Evidently, you didn't take English either.
  • 10 Hide
    jaquith , December 18, 2012 8:03 PM
    Hey, I've donated to Wikipedia because I both use and contribute content. Wikipedia IMHO is the best single online source for information that is concise, organized, and up to date plus it's ad-free.

    So kudos to Cards Against Humanity and many thanks! :) 
  • 9 Hide
    sacre , December 18, 2012 8:51 PM
    Its sad that many teachers still complain about Wikipedia. In my college they won't allow you to quote from them nor paraphrase their information because "Anyone could have edited that information and changed it"

    So I explained to them that those times have changed and as of right now the Data on that site is governed and watched over by the worlds top minds - as oppose to those secondary sites that you refer us too that haven't been updated in years. Besides, the information provided on Wikipedia is cited - if it isn't, than don't use it.

    Honestly, I believe its just frustrating teachers that todays generation is able to get the needed information extremely quickly.

    I see this as opportunity, its amazing and great that a student can do their "research assignment" in a short amount of time because of the resources on the net. Resources out of a book are outdated, what we knew 5 years ago may have changed and the internet provides us with evolving information that changes when new discoveries are made.

    For example, a book at the college explains how the saliva in a Komodo Dragon is just packed with bacteria which causes death whereas recent studies have shown that it does indeed have a venom. Now if I read that book and used that book - i'd be sharing wrong information with everyone in the class.

    People have to move with technology. The internet is a steaming bag of raunchy crap and golden nuggets. Just have to sift through the crap to find the nugget - which isn't too hard today.

    Thanks Wikipedia for providing us with information that continues to astound me and will continue to do so for the rest of my life (which should be relatively short because 10% of the world thinks it will end in 3 days... christ..)

    Cheers.
  • -3 Hide
    wannabepro , December 18, 2012 10:35 PM
    -JacksonThey*Also, you don't put a double space after a period. Evidently, you didn't take English either.

    You are wrong. It is two spaces after a period.
    Not only does two spaces after a period easier to read, but it has also been that way since the days of the typewriter.
    Anyone who thinks otherwise is ignorant.
    APA's view on the matter:
    "Space twice after punctuation marks at the end of a sentence." (Version 6, page 88)
    Source: College Student with an A in English.
  • 2 Hide
    -Jackson , December 19, 2012 7:24 AM
    wannabeproYou are wrong. It is two spaces after a period.Not only does two spaces after a period easier to read, but it has also been that way since the days of the typewriter. Anyone who thinks otherwise is ignorant.APA's view on the matter:"Space twice after punctuation marks at the end of a sentence." (Version 6, page 88)Source: College Student with an A in English.

    Well where I live, I've learned that it's actually one space and not two.
  • 1 Hide
    CrArC , December 19, 2012 10:37 AM
    I don't know that company, but I'm beginning to think they're brilliant. Their sense of humour is... compatible... with mine.
  • 1 Hide
    crystalized , December 19, 2012 10:40 AM
    wannabeproYou are wrong. It is two spaces after a period.Not only does two spaces after a period easier to read, but it has also been that way since the days of the typewriter. Anyone who thinks otherwise is ignorant.APA's view on the matter:"Space twice after punctuation marks at the end of a sentence." (Version 6, page 88)Source: College Student with an A in English.


    because everyone uses a typewriter nowadays
  • -1 Hide
    Anonymous , December 19, 2012 11:20 AM
    Good lord! At this time and age.... People are arguing about spaces between periods/full-stops... As long as it is legible and concise.... Kids these day's... THEY ARGUE OVER ANYTHING! You remind me of my 8 and 11 kids arguing over infantile things... But you see "ADULTS" arguing over such things... Then it makes them look like RETARDED PILLOCKS..... Sad to say....
  • 1 Hide
    arnoldlouie , December 19, 2012 11:42 AM
    Grammar and space is the issue here, It has everything to do with the article. BTW i'd like to upgrade my typewriter to windows 8. (Using double spaces, since I'm using a typewriter.)
  • 0 Hide
    wannabepro , December 19, 2012 12:30 PM
    crystalizedbecause everyone uses a typewriter nowadays

    History and culture my friend, history and culture..
  • 0 Hide
    Pherule , December 19, 2012 6:56 PM
    I don't really know why Wikipedia doesn't just use ads.

    I don't want flash, java, javascript, or picture ads, but putting a small plaintext advert out of the way somewhere should go a long way towards monetary support.

    Base the advert on the article being viewed and the person reading would be much more likely to click the ad. It seems like a perfect opportunity being wasted.
  • 0 Hide
    alidan , December 20, 2012 5:16 AM
    sacreIts sad that many teachers still complain about Wikipedia. In my college they won't allow you to quote from them nor paraphrase their information because "Anyone could have edited that information and changed it"So I explained to them that those times have changed and as of right now the Data on that site is governed and watched over by the worlds top minds - as oppose to those secondary sites that you refer us too that haven't been updated in years. Besides, the information provided on Wikipedia is cited - if it isn't, than don't use it. Honestly, I believe its just frustrating teachers that todays generation is able to get the needed information extremely quickly.I see this as opportunity, its amazing and great that a student can do their "research assignment" in a short amount of time because of the resources on the net. Resources out of a book are outdated, what we knew 5 years ago may have changed and the internet provides us with evolving information that changes when new discoveries are made.For example, a book at the college explains how the saliva in a Komodo Dragon is just packed with bacteria which causes death whereas recent studies have shown that it does indeed have a venom. Now if I read that book and used that book - i'd be sharing wrong information with everyone in the class. People have to move with technology. The internet is a steaming bag of raunchy crap and golden nuggets. Just have to sift through the crap to find the nugget - which isn't too hard today. Thanks Wikipedia for providing us with information that continues to astound me and will continue to do so for the rest of my life (which should be relatively short because 10% of the world thinks it will end in 3 days... christ..)Cheers.


    wikipedia also censors its content too.
    hart fisher
    apparently most things he touched they wont allow on Wikipedia.
Tom’s guide in the world
  • Germany
  • France
  • Italy
  • Ireland
  • UK
Follow Tom’s guide
Subscribe to our newsletter