Motorola has delivered its most versatile foldable lineup to date with the Razr Fold and Razr 70 Ultra. Both devices share the same core DNA: long battery life, robust build quality, and Moto AI woven through the experience in ways that actually help rather than distract.
Of course, they’re built for very different types of premium users. One is a productivity-first book-style device with room to create, multitask and unwind on a sprawling display. The other is a compact flip that punches far above its size class, delivering flagship performance and a surprisingly capable external screen. If you’re weighing up which foldable belongs in your pocket, here’s the breakdown.
Razr Fold vs Razr 70 Ultra: Screen sizes & usability
Both the Razr Fold and Razr 70 Ultra offer unique experiences when it comes to screen size and usability. The Razr Fold leans into sheer screen real estate, jumping from a 6.6‑inch outer panel to an 8.1‑inch unfolded inner display that genuinely changes how you work. Meanwhile, the Razr 70 Ultra takes a different approach: when folded, its 4‑inch external screen handles full apps comfortably, making quick tasks feel natural without ever opening the phone, while its 7-inch unfolded state gives you the full-size user experience we’ve come to expect from a slate-style handset.
The Motorola Razr Fold is the obvious choice if your day revolves around multitasking, editing, sketching or simply enjoying content on a larger canvas — our own John Velasco backs that up in his Razr Fold review, calling it “the closest thing to a laptop replacement I’ve used” and praising its 8.1‑inch inner display as a “spacious canvas for work, creativity and play.” Add Moto Pen Ultra support and you’ve got a foldable that behaves more like a compact tablet when you need it to. And when it’s closed, its 6.6‑inch outer display is big enough to compete with any full-size flagship in terms of usability, giving you a full phone experience without opening the device.
The Razr 70 Ultra takes the opposite approach. When unfolded, it boasts a large 7-inch Extreme AMOLED display that hit 2,761 nits in John Velasco’s Tom’s Guide testing — a level of brightness he says makes it “perfectly visible” outdoors during the day. Velasco also highlights its “sizable 4‑inch external display” and says he’d pick the flip-style phone for being “way more compact,” while noting how often you can still get things done without opening it. It’s big enough to view and write emails, check maps, reply to messages and more.
Razr Fold vs Razr 70 Ultra: Specs & performance
When it comes to specs and performance, both the Razr Fold and Razr 70 Ultra deliver proper flagship grunt — albeit in slightly different ways. The Fold leans into sustained performance and stability, while the Ultra pushes harder on raw speed inside a smaller frame.
In his review for Tom's Guide, John Velasco’s Razr Fold testing shows the Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 “remains incredibly satisfying to use,” backed by 2,711 / 9,134 Geekbench 6 scores and the ability to run four apps at once while maintaining “excellent responsiveness.” In Tom’s Guide’s broader foldable testing, that puts it comfortably ahead of Google’s Pixel 10 Pro Fold, which earns 2,344 / 6,332 in the same benchmark — a noticeable gap in both single‑ and multi‑core performance.
Meanwhile, the Razr 70 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Elite posts 2,886 / 8,982 in Geekbench 6 and is, in Velasco’s words, “the most powerful flip‑style phone I’ve tested,” helped along by 12GB RAM. Heavy app users, mobile photographers and anyone who wants top‑tier responsiveness in a pocketable form factor will feel that extra punch immediately.
Razr Fold vs Razr 70 Ultra: Cameras & content creation
The Razr Fold and Razr 70 Ultra both offer high‑quality, Moto AI-enhanced camera systems on the front and back, making them strong picks for photography and content creation. But the Razr Fold’s larger main display gives it a clearer advantage for viewing and editing your shots. Not surprising, given it's the model DXOMark praised as the new best foldable phone for photography overall.
The Razr Fold comes out swinging with a full flagship‑style camera loadout: three 50MP rear sensors (a 50MP f/1.6 main, 50MP f/2.0 ultrawide and 50MP f/2.4 3x telephoto) plus 32MP and 20MP selfie cameras depending on whether you’re using the cover screen or the big 8.1‑inch inner display. In his review for Tom’s Guide, John Velasco’s testing shows the Razr Fold outperforming Samsung’s Galaxy Z Fold 7 in several key areas, with Moto AI image enhancement helping to provide brighter images, better low-light results and superior zoom performance.
The Razr 70 Ultra takes the flip‑phone route with a simpler dual setup — a 50MP f/1.8 main and 50MP f/2.0 ultrawide — but leans on Motorola’s LOFIC‑equipped OmniVision OV50T sensor and Moto AI tools to preserve highlights and expand dynamic range. In his review, John Velasco points out that the new Night Vision mode helps the Ultra see better in the dark, producing cleaner, more usable low‑light shots than previous Razr flip devices. Velasco also calls out how handy it is to flip the phone shut and use the outer display to frame yourself with the main cameras, turning the Razr 70 Ultra into a surprisingly capable little tool for vlogs and quick video recordings.
Razr Fold vs Razr 70 Ultra: Battery life
When it comes to battery life, both the Razr Fold and Razr 70 Ultra deliver far better endurance than most foldables — but they get there in very different ways. Both include cutting-edge silicon-carbon batteries that allow for larger capacities and faster charging, with the Fold leaning on sheer capacity and efficiency, while the Ultra squeezes surprising longevity out of a compact frame.
Velasco’s Razr Fold testing shows its 6,000mAh silicon-carbon battery is a genuine outlier, clocking 14 hours and 44 minutes on the Tom’s Guide drain test — a result he calls “record‑setting battery life” for a book‑style foldable. For context, Samsung’s Galaxy Z Fold 7 managed 10 hours and 44 minutes, making Motorola’s larger model the stronger choice for all‑day productivity.
Meanwhile, the Razr 70 Ultra pushes endurance even further. Its 5,000mAh silicon‑carbon battery averaged 16 hours and 20 minutes, earning Velasco’s description as “the longest‑lasting battery in a foldable phone.” For comparison, Samsung’s Galaxy Z Flip 7 came in at 12 hours and 24 minutes — solid for a flip but well short of Motorola’s result. If you want a compact foldable that reliably goes a full day — and often well into the next — the Ultra is the standout.
Razr Fold vs Razr 70 Ultra: Which phone is right for you?
In trying to decide between the Razr Fold and Razr 70 Ultra, Motorola’s two new foldables make the choice surprisingly straightforward.
The Razr Fold is the one to pick if you want a device for next-level productivity. Its huge inner display, stronger multitasking performance, expanded camera system and excellent battery life make it an ideal choice for people who are often juggling multiple tasks at once.
The Razr 70 Ultra, on the other hand, is built for those who want a compact device without sacrificing power. Its bright 7-inch inner screen, genuinely useful 4-inch outer display, flagship-level performance and class-leading battery life make it the most advanced flip phone you can buy right now.
Both the Razr 70 Ultra and Razr Fold are powerful, premium foldables which benefit from advanced Moto AI features, the latest silicon-carbon battery technology and gorgeous screens — both inside and out. The real decision comes down to what you want from your phone: big and expansive, or small and deceptively capable.
To find out more about Motorola’s 2026 foldable flagships, head to the official Motorola Australia product pages:
Follow Tom's Guide on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds.
