13 Webcams Reviewed : Logitech QuickCam Ultra Vision
8. Logitech QuickCam Ultra Vision
- QuickCam Ultra Vision...
Given the price, this webcam is classed in the high end. We can only hope that the QuickCam Ultra Vision will live up to its promises in tests and that the manufacturers claims prove to be true.
Logitech says the Ultra Vision offers superior image quality to its rivals independent of ambient lighting conditions. This implies that definition should be very good both during the day and at night.
Another quality touted by Logitech is that sound is very clear. Let’s now move onto the product evaluation.
Style and design that stands out.
With its two colors and a cylindrical shape, the Ultra Vision sets itself apart from traditional black and round webcams. Moreover, its retro look isn’t unattractive and --in our offices at least-- was a matter of taste. Those that liked the Ultra Vision found the cream color more casual and thought the long shape, although it is a bit imposing, went well with their monitor.
The flexible base enables placement on any type of screen whether it be a CRT or LCD.
The zoom and face tracking function well.
These two functions offer very good results. The zoom doesn't cause any cuts in fluidity and perfectly follows the subject’s movements. In addition, automatic focus is fast in face tracking. One small dampener on our enthusiasm was that image sharpness wasn’t excellent when the zoom is at its maximum.
Very good rendering at day and night, nice sound quality.
It’s been some time since we’ve encountered a new and good webcam. But given this one's pricing, its the least we can expect.
Image sharpness is very satisfactory. Colors are very accurate though we did occasionally notice a few chromatic aberrations in lighter areas. For example, black lines on a white sheet of paper in the background can sometimes appear blue. At any rate, this is nothing catastrophic.
We didn’t notice any afterglow or cuts in fluidity. Use during the day is very satisfactory, however where we really want to check results is in poorly lit conditions. And here the good surprise was that this QuickCam offers fine quality images with very good definition. There was very little noise and still no afterglow in images.
Sound quality is is good with no blowing or cuts.
Anything else?
The QuickCam offers its share of avatars but nothing too new in this domain.
| Pluses: Minuses: Price
|
Besides the high price, this webcam offers very nice image quality during the day and at night. However, the Dualpix HD from Hercules (yes, this webcam again) is much less expensive and still unbeaten.
does really a webcam need to be reviewd?
Yeah, I think it's a great review. I just purchased a 25.5" Asus monitor with a built in 2.0MP Bright Cam. My wife got on a video conference with her friends and loved it, so now I'm looking for one for her. By the way, how do these compare with my built-in Web Cam? I can't find any specs other than the 2.0MP.
However... It would have been nice to have a price list (there's not even a mention of price in each respective camera's review), and maybe a summary at the end showing prices and ratings. And maybe a top pick in a couple of price categories.
hey man! I was joking, Great article!
However... It would have been nice to have a price list (there's not even a mention of price in each respective camera's review), and maybe a summary at the end showing prices and ratings. And maybe a top pick in a couple of price categories.
Hey Gutbop,
Check the right-hand side of each page for pricing info on the units. We use a search engine to display the price results because the prices for this kind of product are so variable across retailers.
Thanks,
Rachel Rosmarin
Editor of Tom's Guide
Its a shame that only a single webcam seemed to come with security software (scheduled snapshots or motion detection). However, with free software such as Yawcam, I don't suppose its too big a deal.
While I'm sure overall image quality has improved, these new cams don't seem to be any more functional than my 9 year old logitec QuickCam Express (the white golfball webcam). Sure some have face tracking (how well does that work with limited field of view anyway?), but the overall low resolution and general lack of autofocus on most of these cameras just doesn't justify an upgrade. Although the built-in microphones might be nice, sometimes you just need voice-chat, meaning a microphone built into the webcam might be unnecessary or redundant.
I'd like to see more photos, quality is my number one concern. Also, how will any of these work in a meeting room environment. Is it plausable to use them for conference's? I guess audio would be the biggest issue with that.
no conclusion pages ? would've been nice to see what is the best webcam available on the market, what webcam has the best price/performance ratio, etc.
That Creative bundles home surveillance software hardly matters - the best-of-breed (for non technical users) is HomeCamera, and that's a free download from their site (www.homecamera.com).
Hey, I live in a college dorm and a few of my roommates don't have a PC. My roommates aren't to enter my room without permission/unless I'm there. I'm looking for webcam software that I can use to view my room but that I can leave on the screen because my one friend can and does use my PC sometimes for writing papers. I want to see who comes in my room, especially on the weekends when I often travel home. It would be cool if it would automatically boot as well from Windows Startup in case of a crash without a splash screen. I'd like it to be able to email me motion detected snapshots or something. Anyone know of any software that will do all of this?
~Jonny
Dangit, we need an edit button. What I wanted to ask is there a program that is COMPLETELY HIDEABLE that will do all that.
I agree with crystalized - a summary table or conclusion would have been nice for those not wanting to read every page.
Reviews? On my TGH? It's less likely than you think.
I thought all they did was opinion polls.
What would have been nice is two identical sample photos taken with each camera. One in proper lighting conditions and one in dark.
Without them, the review is rather useless for me. I mean, one sample photo included cheesy video effects. How am I to compare the quality of that one to another which has a normal shot. Not to mention the ones which don't have a shot at all.
i do like comparative tables, with actual prices, and, of course, Mac OSX, and Linux drivers and features for this systems. I use several OSs, and i do like products compatible with all of them, and if it possible with all the features at every system.
i do like comparative tables, with actual prices, and, of course, Mac OSX, and Linux drivers and features for this systems. I use several OSs, and i do like products compatible with all of them, and if it possible with all the features at every system.
oops
I'd like to see more photos, quality is my number one concern. Also, how will any of these work in a meeting room environment. Is it plausable to use them for conference's? I guess audio would be the biggest issue with that.
Hi Michael, we use a mixture of desktop and meeting room set-ups using Nefsis Video Conferencing. We find the L'tech Pro900 is great for small rooms (we did use the L'tech Sphere but had too many issues!). For larger rooms you can a Sony evi-d70 with a frame grabber (e.g. Osprey 100 - works well). Unfortunately it seems that there is a big gulf between top end webcams and meeting room based cameras. Anyone got any other suggestions?
What about the HP webcam? I have one, and it is great in dark & light. Autofocus is included, along with security software, et al.
Why miss this one???
Its also able to do 12MP stills as well... I don't get why this was forgotten in the rush to do Logitech & Microsoft (predominantly) webcams...
USB webcam is really a great work for computer technology, only for this , it can truly realize the break through of the limits from the geography