Want Security? Think Like a Casino

By Mary Branscombe, published on March 31, 2008
Source: Tom's Guide | Keywords: , | Themes: Digital Entertainment

5. Want Security? Think Like a Casino

“Oceans 11” got it right. What happens in Vegas gets filmed – and tagged and tracked throughout the casino. It’s not just the 2,000 cameras in a casino like the Bellagio; a Las Vegas casino has more sensors per square foot than anywhere but a battleship, IBM Distinguished Engineer Jeff Jonas said.

“Each resort has tens of thousands of sensors: every door-lock system, every slot machine, ATM machines, point of sale machines, it just goes on and on,” Jonas said.

And Jonas should know. Until IBM bought his company, he designed security systems used by half the casinos in the world. Now that he works on national security and banking fraud he was happy to spill the inside scoop at Etech.

oreilly etech

After he met a gambler who used wigs and glasses and fake mustaches to disguise himself as he cheated in casino after casino, Jonas pioneered facial recognition software but the systems don’t scan everyone. Only a handful of people will be watched by the casino on video; they’ll save the recordings to refer back to when winnings are suspiciously large. Card counters won’t get thrown out unless they’re too good – and if they’re with someone losing 10 times as much money, the casino won’t upset the high roller by throwing their friend out. “They spend the minimum amount of money on security and surveillance,” Jonas said. “They’d rather buy three more slot machines and make money. They only mess with you if you’re really, really cheating.”

But the casinos do want to track cheaters and high rollers. The fine for letting someone play when they’ve been banned by the gaming commission could cost the casino more than they’d ever win. The casino has to track you once you win more than $10,000 for tax purposes. If an ardent gambler loses too much money they might never come back so Harrah’s uses analytics software from SAS to spot people who are losing big and then offer them free meals and show tickets to get them away from the tables. And if you win too much, the casino will try to tempt you with anything, including a private jet waiting to fly you back to lose it all again.

Cheating can be as simple as switching cards with a friend or as complex as filming the cards inside the shuffling machine and slowing down the video to spot which card is coming next. If a miscreant could somehow pull it off, getting a dealer to use a stacked deck could win someone $250,000 in 15 minutes. A secret code in a video poker game that gives you a good hand if you follow a specific betting pattern has been put there on purpose, but a slot machine that gives you $100 to play with and returns your $100 bill at the same time might just have a bug. And if armed robbers show up, casino security may stand back rather than provoking a shootout. Like the kidnappers who got away with a $1 million ransom for the daughter of casino owner Steve Wynn, they’ll be caught when they go out and spend the money.

That might be the only way we’ll catch the criminals behind botnets if more people don’t use a personal firewall. Michael Staggs of FireEye spends his time tracking down traffic that comes from infected machines. It’s usually hard because bots use a variety of exploits to take over computers. They hide for two months before they do anything and delete the evidence as they go along. Even when you find an infected machine it’s not cost effective for law enforcement to look at individual computers.

But some attacks are so blatant that they send commands in plain text. A taskforce checking for an older generation of bots that use IRC found 16,000 infected servers in one day. Of the 600 million computers that have used Google’s search services in the last year, one in six have displayed what Staggs calls “bot-like behavior.” He predicted that 5%-10% of computers at the conference would be infected. And if you think moving away from Windows makes you secure, think again; while 90% of bots are on Windows PCs, 8% are on Linux systems and 2% are on Macs.

Hacker Pablos Holman showed how vulnerable voicemail and credit cards are at the conference. He used caller ID spoofing to hack into the AT&T voicemail of ETech organizer Brady Forrest and change his message then used a few lines of JavaScript to add his own content to CNNMoney.com. He opened a supposedly secure Schlage door lock with a blank key and a mallet and decoded a credit card number from the RFID chip in it. In each case he was using loopholes rather than cracking the system. Rather than working out how to decode the credit card encryption he bought a credit card machine on eBay.

oreilly etech

Comments | Print | Send to a friend

Google Ads

Comments


Rondil 04/02/2008 2:54 AM
Hide
-0+
Rondil
I predict the next BIG thing will be wearable computers. Start with an extremely low power processor like the CN processor. Next use the new mousing technology that uses 3 different sensors and lets you mouse in 3D (search 3d mouse). Add wireless technology so that you can access the Internet and your home computer. Now add some of the very slick new vision technology (search HMD). Finish it up with the knee charger that was in the news recently and you have a computer thats with you always and that you can access anywhere. (search energy-capturing knee brace)
Deleted profile 04/02/2008 2:06 AM
Hide
-0+
"the average American uses 12,000 watts a year, which is the equivalent of 120 100-watt light bulbs running 24 hours a day all year long"

I think he means that the constant power demand of an average American is 12kW. Then the total energy consumption of an American becomes ~105MWh/y
Deleted profile 04/03/2008 2:10 AM
Hide
-0+
Mooing like a cat?
Deleted profile 04/03/2008 1:19 AM
Hide
-0+
Can the author please correct his basic physics errors that mix up energy (measured e.g. in kWh) and power (could be measured in Watts).
HerbCSO 04/05/2008 3:30 AM
Hide
-0+
HerbCSO
OK, is it just me or does the entire section on "Predicting the future with crowds" seem entirely too much like Hari Seldon's psychohistory from Isaac Asimov's Foundation series?
Deleted profile 04/07/2008 4:10 AM
Hide
-0+
"We also cannot accurately assess the impact of CO2 emission on the climate because we don?t have a powerful enough computer to model the entire climate."

So why are we spending billions on reducing CO2 emissions? We aren't even sure they have anything to do with anything. ...just another liberal money pit.

Note You are going to post a comment as anonymous.

  •  

Google Ads