2. Toshiba Regza 46SV670U
LED-backlit HDTVs are coming out in force in 2009-2010. Here are two models in the 40-49 inch range that should suit any home theater enthusiast well.
Our Readings

| Real Contrast: | 1677:1 |
| Blacks: | 0.12 cd/m² |
| Gamma Quality: | 4.5/5 |
| DeltaE 94: | 5.1 |
| Average discrepancy across whole display: | 9% |
| Viewing angles: | 1.7/5 |
| Energy Consumption: | 0.15 W / 216 W |
| Multimedia player: | 1.7/5 |
At last it's time for us to test a Toshiba TV--and not just any Toshiba TV, because today we're looking at the 46SV670U with LED backlighting.
More accurately, the backlighting system in question uses local-dimming LEDs, a network of LEDs behind the display that should produce a more even light and more accurate dynamic backlighting. The downside of this system is that the television itself has to be a lot thicker, with the frame measuring 9.4 cm from front to back on the 46'' version. The last thing to note about the 1080p Full HD display is that it sits underneath a glossy layer that suffers from reflections.
Thanks to the Ethernet port, you can access content stored on a DLNA compatible server, but the only video format that's supported is DivX; all of other test files wouldn't play at all, which doesn't make for a very rounded multimedia player.
The remote is decent and well-organized, but it's a shame that it's not backlit, especially given that it comes with a TV close to the top of Toshiba's range.
Image Quality
Switching to Cinema mode improves the problematic curve, producing a much more natural image. The blacks are however a little too light at 0.12 cd/m², compared to some of Toshiba's competitors which are below 0.05 cd/m². The colors are also more accurate, but still far from perfect: the deltaE 94 hangs at 5.1 when it should really be under 3.0. When we took the same measurements at a 45° angle from the centre line in every direction the results were pretty bad: deltaE shot up to between 8 and 10 and whites became far too bright. Wide viewing angles are certainly not a boast the 46SV670U can make! HD content still looks good if you're looking straight at the screen, and SD content benefits from decent upscaling, even if dedicated players do it better.

The gamma curve (left) and color temperature (right) are both very close to the standard we expect--well done!
The Active Vision M240HD filter does a good job of improving the fluidity of movements, but the price you pay is a reduced quality image overall with too much ghosting.
Overall, the picture might seem gloomy, but don't forget that the Regza 46SV670U is one of the first televisions to undergo our updated 2010 test procedure, which is more demanding in several areas, including viewing angles. The image quality it provides is perfectly decent, and the majority of viewers will be happy, but if you need particularly wide viewing angles, you should avoid it at all costs.
Sound Quality: A rare success story
We've often noticed that larger TVs often offer the best quality sound, partly because of the extra room that's available for the speakers. The 46SV670U confirms this trend, with very decent audio, compared to the majority of its competitors at least. It's still a long way from being able to rival decent dedicated Home Cinema sound system.
Energy Consumption: Greedy!
The 46SV670U had a nasty surprise in store for us at the end of the test: when it's switched on, it uses around 216 W, not much less than a comparable plasma. Or, to put it another way, that's one of the worse results we've seen on an LCD TV for a long time. If you use the default settings, you can get that down to 143 W by turning off the LEDs in the darkest areas, but that has a negative impact on the display quality.
Fortunately things on standby are better, with a consumption of around 0.15 W.
| Toshiba Regza 46SV670U | |
|---|---|
| Pros | Cons |
|
|
Without being excellent, the 46SV670U puts in a decent performance and produces a reasonable quality image. It's hot on the heels of the leaders of the pack, but hasn't quite got what it takes to overtake.
- 1. LG 42SL90
- 2. Toshiba Regza 46SV670U


no one cares.
Showdown? LOL there are only 2 tvs compared!!!!
Hopefull to see full, led backligted tv, comparison in the future.
This is like fast snack... I am still hungry. But led based tvset are great interest in year 2010. In 2012 they hopefullu are obsolete by Oled, but at this moment they are coming to main stream.
Waslooking for some offerings from Vizio, Samsung, LG, and maybe the new Sony XBR10.... I hope you do a part B
I got to look at a variety of brands and models at several stores. They had the partial and full led backlit models. I can't make up my mind whether I like them better than my plasma tv.
wow. this is the weakest showdown ever
Every LED TV I've seen up close looks like crap
The most important "feature" of a LEd-Tv; LED backlight; isn't even mentioned. How about backlight bleeding, people !
Is it good? How good? It's most likely the only thing that sets a LED-TV apart from a normal TN panel.
I'm still happy with my Samsung 52" A650. In a few years I may move over but for now there's just not enough improvement to justify the cost.
Every LED TV I've seen up close looks like crap
Agreed, I have yet to see any LCD based tv look as good as a plasma or old crt. I really wish manufacturers would just ditch trying to make LCD's look decent and just concentrate on OLED tech at this point...
No one sits up close to a LED (in their right mind), I have a year old 47" Vizio and it looks great on the HD channels and dvds.
If you sit 6-8' away (like on the couch) it looks really good imo
To each their own I guess...
But I'll never go back to a crt in the living room, very happy!
Regards
LED is for suckers. Lastest generation Plasma delivers much better image at half the cost. Don't buy this hype...
Plasmas are thicker, twice the weight and eat power like there's no tomorrow. At least you can watch an LED TV in a room with bright ambiant lighting and still see the screen instean of reflections.
Plasmas are thicker, twice the weight and eat power like there's no tomorrow. At least you can watch an LED TV in a room with bright ambiant lighting and still see the screen instean of reflections.
Somebody doesn't own a plasma and/or believes everything they hear from the Best Buy salesman...
Thicker?, yes, but who cares about another inch - big whoop it's only 3" thick as it is. Twice the weight?, depends on the model, but again who cares; I'm not taking it to work everyday with me and I only had to worry about that one time, when I mounted it on the wall. More power?, yes, but on average only 150watts more at 42" size, turn off two light bulbs in your house. Ambient light issues? Mine faces a wall of windows 24/7 and has zero issues unless the sun is setting and it is directly firing at the screen, so I go close the blinds...
Ability to have deep blacks, a wide color gamut, great skin tones, zero screen door effect, no dead pixels, zero viewing angle problems, no jagged edges, SD material looks good, and it costs much less than LCD for the same screen size?! Win, win, win, win, win...Until OLED goes mainstream, Plasma all day long...
LCD and Plasma are totally different puppies. Plasma pixels can die since each image dot called a pixel is a little light bulb. Fluorescent tube backlights the entire LCD screen if a light dies your entire image will be gone since the Liquid Dynamic Crystals wont be lit anymore. This is why LED which last longer is better in a way, that is if they really last longer in reality (maybe some other piece will break). Also all energy saving lights make you depressive.
We need reviews from more than 2 sets.
At least something from Vizio and Samsung.
Just a small note. Thoughout the short article they keep calling the LCD's when it's titled LED TV ShootOut.....did they forget what their own article was about?
Just a small note. Thoughout the short article they keep calling the LCD's when it's titled LED TV ShootOut.....did they forget what their own article was about?