Skip to main content

The best audiophile headphones in 2022

Hero image for best audiophile headphones showing Bowers & Wilkins PX7 S2 close up headphones held in hand of reviewer
(Image credit: Tom's Guide)

The best audiophile headphones deliver top-tier sound quality and get you closer to your favorite artists no matter what your music tastes. 

You may think that the best-sounding headphones would cost a fortune, but choose wisely and that needn't be the case. While the highest of high-end headphones justify their price tags though carefully honed luxury finishes, mid-market models such as the ones in this list often benefit greatly from the flagship model's developments. 

All the models here major on the best sound quality we've heard. Some let the music shine and are pretty low on extra features, others have a strong feature sets and also include desirable tech such as active noise cancellation (ANC) and fast charging. 

So read on for the best audiophile headphones available today. And if you're looking for a specific headphone style, then check out our best over-ear headphones or best wireless earbuds buying guides. And don't forget our best cheap earbuds buying guide, too. We've also got a guide to getting the best sound out of your headphones once you've made your choice.

More: Bowers & Wilkins' flagship headphone has arrived, check out our first impressions in our Px8 hands-on.

Top 3 best audiophile headphones 

(opens in new tab)

Elite audiophile headphone: Sony WH-1000XM5
The top spot goes to Sony’s WH-1000XM5 for their exceptional sound quality, active noise cancellation, and high levels of comfort. They build on their similarly excellent predecessor the XM4 and offer LDAC support for high-resolution Bluetooth streaming, delivering superior sound quality for your hi-res music library.

(opens in new tab)

Premium audiophile headphone: Bowers & Wilkins PX7 S2
The Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S2 over-ears feel good, are beautifully constructed, have active noise-cancelation, and a control app. Extended functionality is not their thing as they're designed to deliver the best wireless sound this sort of money can buy. And they do — with one of the most enjoyable performances we've heard.

(opens in new tab)

Best audiophile in-ears overall: Sennheiser IE 600
‘Wired’ has always beaten ‘wireless’ where out-and-out sound quality is concerned. If you take your mobile listening seriously enough to have paid money for a dedicated digital audio player, rather than relying on your smartphone to do the business, then the Sennheiser IE 600 will charm and delight you. 

Best audiophile headphones: Over-ears

Black and ecru (off-white) color versions against a office windowEditor's Choice

(Image credit: Tom's Guide)
Best sound quality from a noise canceler

Specifications

Headphone type: Closed-back, wireless/wired over-ear
Size and weight: Not specified; 8.8 ounces
Battery life (rated): 30 hours (ANC on); 40 hours (ANC off)
Bluetooth range: 43 feet
ANC: Yes
Codec support: SBC, AAC, LDAC
Wired cable supplied: Yes

Reasons to buy

+
Articulate and engaging sound
+
Great control options
+
Impressive noise-cancelation

Reasons to avoid

-
Redesign and eco credentials ups the price
-
Gets hot around the ears during longer listening

Sony’s newest flagship over-ear headphones outperform every competitor for their exceptional sound delivery, active noise cancellation performance and special features. The dynamic soundstage just gets better with each update and delivers plenty of energy and detail to give songs a full-bodied presence without sounding unbalanced right from the off — although listeners can also use the Sony Headphones Connect app to personalize audio with several well-engineered presets or by manually adjusting the EQ to their liking.

The Sonys deliver everything you could want from an audiophile on-ear headphone. Support for LDAC ensures the XM5s deliver the best performance over Bluetooth and they can also be hard-wired for the very best sound quality with hi-res material. The new design tends towards the bland, but the fact that both the headphones and packaging are made almost entirely from recycled materials is a further mark in its favor. Lastly, their long battery life and comfortable design mean these are one pair of headphones you won’t want to take off. 

Read our full Sony WH-1000XM5 review.

Bowers & Wilkins PX7 S2 headphones outside on a garden tableEditor's Choice

(Image credit: Tom's Guide)
Sophisticated style and sound in a premium package

Specifications

Headphone type: Closed-back, wireless/wired over-ear
Size and weight: Not specified; 10.8 ounces
Battery life (rated): Up to 30 hours
Bluetooth range: >30 feet
ANC: Yes
Codec support: SBC, AAC, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive
Wired cable supplied: Yes

Reasons to buy

+
Balanced, engrossing and confident sound
+
Improved noise-cancelation over its Px7 sibling
+
Sophisticated looks (if you like that sort of thing)

Reasons to avoid

-
No touch-controls and features are a bit basic
-
Noise cancelation is bettered by rivals
-
Anonymous looks (if you don’t)

The Bowers & Wilkins Px7 S2 over-ear headphones are priced the same as the Sony. They feel good, are beautifully constructed and are either good-looking in an understated way or a bit too understated for their own good — it depends on your taste. They have active noise-cancelation and a control app — but ‘extended functionality’ is not their thing. 

They’re designed to deliver the best wireless sound this sort of money can buy, and they do. The entire frequency range hangs together well, with nothing overstated and nothing struggling for representation. Tonality is clean, consistent and entirely convincing. If you want every wireless headphone feature under the sun, you have plenty of choice. If, however, you want headphones that make the most of the digital audio information you give them, the Px7 S2 really needs to be in your thinking.

Read our full Bowers & Wilkins PX7 S2 review

Lifestyle shot of Technics EAH-A800 on worktop with a coffee pot and cup out of focus in the background

(Image credit: Panasonic)
Audiophile sound with ANC from hi-fi heritage cans

Specifications

Headphone type: Closed-back, wireless/wired over-ear
Size and weight: 7-11/16 x 6-11/16 x 3-3/8 inches; 10.5 ounces
Battery life (rated): 50 hours (ANC on)
Bluetooth range: 33 feet
ANC: Yes
Codec support: SBC, AAC, LDAC
Wired cable supplied: Yes

Reasons to buy

+
Lively, balanced and entirely believable sound
+
Impressive battery life
+
Great build quality and high-level finish
+
Good comfort level

Reasons to avoid

-
Noise cancelling not quite up to the best
-
Plenty of price rivals

The Technics EAH-A800 follow the classic on-ear headphone design built for comfort and performance. Listening to these headphones we reckon you’ll be hard-pushed to find an equivalent pair that’s more expressive on the finest details in your favorite recordings. From the bottom of the frequency range to the top, the EAH-A800 are beautifully judged so no matter what kind of music you're listening to, the Technics seem to understand its requirements down to a microscopic level. The LDAC codec is supported for getting the best quality over Bluetooth connectivity, and a cable for hard-wired connections to a headphone jack is also supplied. 

Things are less cut-and-dried where active noise-cancellation is concerned and they don’t deal with as much external sound as the best of their rivals do. Bottom-end battery life is 30 hours (when listening to the hi-res LDAC codec with noise-cancelling switched on) and a best-case of 60 hours (listening via AAC with noise-cancelling switched off).

Read our full Technics EAH-A800 review.  

Sennheiser Momentum 4 Wireless headphones with case on window seat at reviewer's home

(Image credit: Tom's Guide)
Best-ever battery life for a wireless headphone with ANC

Specifications

Headphone type: Closed-back, wireless/wired over-ear
Size and weight: 7 x 7.67 x 1.82 inches; 10.3 ounces
Battery life (rated): Up to 60 hours with ANC enabled
Bluetooth range: > 30 feet
ANC: Yes
Codec support: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX Low-Latency
Wired cable supplied: Yes

Reasons to buy

+
Spectacular battery life
+
Great sound
+
Effective noise-cancelling performance 
+
Reliable touch controls
+
Robust design with plain styling (if you like that sort of thing)

Reasons to avoid

-
Anonymous styling
-
Earpads may make ears hot
-
Flaky connectivity issues with Smart Control app

Although the revamped design of Sennheiser's fourth generation Momentum Wireless headphones don't stand out quite like their classic-looking predecessor, the 60-hour battery life is a real crowd pleaser and make these the one to beat. Add in the easy-going Sennheiser sound and effective noise cancelling, and the Momentum 4 are one the most practical wireless headphones we've seen, perfectly built for a life on the road rather than tethered to a power socket needing regular battery top ups. 

Sennheiser's smooth house sound handles a wide range of music content, from pounding beats to more mellow tunes with aplomb. It has Bluetooth 5.2 and aptX Adaptive support, and there's a supplied 3.5mm cable for audiophile wired connections. ANC performance is effective, and auto Wind Noise Reduction is very impressive when stood on a windy train platform on daily work commutes.

Read our full Sennheiser Momentum 4 Wireless review.

Best audiophile headphones: Wired and wireless earbuds

Sennheiser IE600 on carry case in natural lightEditor's Choice

(Image credit: Tom's Guide)
Wired in-ears deliver true hi-res sound in style

Specifications

Headphone type : In-ear wired
Connectivity: Cable with 3.5mm jack; 4.4mm jack (balanced)
Driver type: 7mm dynamic

Reasons to buy

+
Uncompromised build and finish 
+
Detailed, expansive and thoroughly engrossing sound

Reasons to avoid

-
Unfashionable, but not yet retro, configuration 
-
High-frequency can become over confident at times

With their exceptional build quality and lightweight design, the Sennheiser IE 600 are one of the most desirable earbuds we've seen. Okay, they're wired, which may seem a little outdated alongside many true wireless earbuds designs, but as any audiophile will know, ‘wired’ has always beaten ‘wireless’ where out-and-out sound quality is concerned. 

The Sennheiser IE 600 charm and delight, and delve deep and hit hard where low frequencies are concerned, but sounds are well-shaped and alive with detail both broad and fine. It’s a similar story in the midrange, where singers of any and every type are given the space to properly express themselves — the IE 600, it seems, have never heard a vocalist they didn’t want to make the most of. The price may limit their appeal, but these make a great partner for anyone with a dedicated hi-res music player.

Read the full Sennheiser IE 600 review.

Grado GT220 with charging case on stone slabTop Pick

(Image credit: Future)
Highly authentic sound but low on features

Specifications

Headphone type: In-ear wireless
Size and weight: 0.2 ounces (per bud); 1.5 ounces (charging case)
Battery life (rated): 6 hours, 36 hours (with charging case)
Bluetooth range: Not specified
ANC: No
Codec support: SBC, AAC, aptX
Water resistant: Yes (IPX4 rated)

Reasons to buy

+
Balanced and authentic sound 
+
High comfort levels
+
Good battery life
+
Useful touch-controls

Reasons to avoid

-
Fiddly when changing ear tips
-
No active noise-cancelling

Grado’s GT220 true wireless earbuds are not overburdened by features such as ANC or a control app to tinker with the sound output. Compared to rivals listed here, these are a very straightforward design indeed that simply goes about the business of connecting you to your favorite music and as such, are one of the best-sounding earbud designs we’ve heard. 

Offering decent battery life and recharge time, they're perfectly pitched for music listening on the move and the sound quality delivery will also appeal to those who want to enjoy more serious listening at home from a compact earbud. Aimed at audiophiles looking to hear Grado’s signature sound in a true wireless product with top audio quality as a priority over everything else, the lack of extra facilities really shouldn’t be seen as a deal breaker at the price.

Read our full Grado GT220 review.

Astell & Kern earbuds in their caseEditor's Choice

(Image credit: Tom's Guide)
Best wireless earbuds for sound

Specifications

Headphone type: In-ear wireless
Size and weight: Not specified; 0.25 ounces
Battery life (rated): Up to 24 hours
Bluetooth range: Not specified
ANC: No
Codec support: SBC, AAC, aptX Adaptive
Water resistant: Not specified

Reasons to buy

+
Explicit, entertaining and convincing sound
+
Great technical spec and decent battery life
+
Well-implemented touch controls

Reasons to avoid

-
No active noise-canceling
-
No voice assistant
-
Bulky fit may not be right for all

As its first pair of true wireless earbuds, on paper, the AK Hi-Fi TWS UW100 (to give them their full name) are a mixture of ‘great specification’ and ‘noticeable specification omissions’. In practice, though, the sound they make will be impressive enough to make all but the most committed box-tickers (or those for who the negation of external sound is even more important than the quality of their sound they’re listening to) overlook these shortcomings.

No two ways about it, these Astell & Kern earbuds sound excellent. Whether that’s down to the robustness of their wireless connectivity, the high-end nature of their DAC, the uncompromised engineering of their drivers or (most likely), the combination of all three is, ultimately, neither here nor there. It’s the result that counts — and the results here are extremely impressive. 

Read our full Astell & Kern AK UW100 review.

The Sony WF-1000XM4 displayed over a tropical backdrop

(Image credit: Regan Coule/Future)
Best all-round wireless earbuds for sound and features

Specifications

Headphone type: In-ear wireless
Size and weight: 1 x 0.8 x 0.8 inches (per bud), 2.4 x 1.5 x 1.1 inches (charging case); 0.2 ounces (per bud), 2 ounces (charging case)
Battery life (rated): 8 hours (ANC on), 12 hours (ANC off), 24 hours (with charging case), 35 hours (with charging case and ANC off)
Bluetooth range: 33 feet
ANC: Yes
Codec support: SBC, AAC, LDAC
Water resistant: Yes (IPX4 rated)

Reasons to buy

+
Exceptional, full-bodied sound
+
Gorgeous redesign
+
Strong noise cancellation
+
Great battery life
+
Endless number of personalized features
+
Responsive smart controls

Reasons to avoid

-
Call quality still under performs
-
Unstable fit
-
No multipoint technology or NFC

The Sony WF-1000XM4 packages elite sound, noise cancellation, and awesome features. Pricing might be a deterrent, but the fact that this set of buds offers great functionality makes it well worth the splurge. Add in longer battery life and great sound quality across the board and you can see why it’s a top contender in these rankings.

The stereo imaging on these buds is phenomenal, with instruments accurately placed and localized on tracks. It brings an immersive quality to recordings and makes you believe musicians are actually playing right in front of you. Vocal detail is so clear on recordings, you can almost feel the passion and emotion in the artist voice. The low end is engineered with balance in mind, which translates to a pleasant blend of lows, mids, and highs that enables listeners to pick up on sonic characteristics that would go unnoticed on other wireless earbuds and makes them an excellent audiophile choice.

Read our full Sony WF-1000XMF review.

The Shure Aonic Free wireless earbuds sitting in the charging case

(Image credit: Regan Coule/Future)
Audiophile sound with passive noise reduction

Specifications

Headphone type: In-ear wireless
Size and weight: 0.5 x 0.4 x 0.39 inches (per bud); 3.5 x 2 x 1 inches (charging case); 0.5 ounces (charging case)
Battery life (rated): 7 hours; 21 hours (charging case)
Bluetooth range: 30 feet
ANC: No
Codec support: SBC, AAC, aptX
Water resistant: Not specified

Reasons to buy

+
Audiophile sound
+
Trusty fit via Comply Foam tips
+
Effective noise isolation
+
Useful ambient-listening mode
+
Extensive Bluetooth range

Reasons to avoid

-
Large charging case has mediocre battery top-up capacity
-
Buggy companion app
-
No wireless charging or multipoint technology

If sound quality is your main concern and you have no need for ANC, Shure's Aonic Free earbuds are a gloriously capable pair of earbuds. These wireless earbuds sound fantastic and deliver on their promise to decrease ambient noise to a satisfying level without the need for ANC. 

Shure has a strong audio history and the earbuds sound accurate and detailed, letting listeners hear subtle nuances, along with a fine mix of lows, mids, and highs. The Free's full-range dynamic driver reproduces the deeply textured instruments and multi-layered vocals superbly. Infectious bass riffs stimulate head nods, and even small characteristics sound prominent and captivating.  

Read our full Shure Aonic Free review.

Headphone types explained

Over-ear (circumaural) headphones

The largest headphone type, over-ear headphones surround or cup your ears. A classic, old-school style, over-ear headphones come in either a closed-back or open-back design. Closed-back headphones contain playback sounds within the earcup enclosure and are better at passively isolating wearers from external ambient noise. The effect of listening to music on closed-back models is often less expansive, and the stereo soundstage can feel contained within the head, but does prevent sound from leaking out and irritating anyone nearby. 

Open-back headphones often have a more natural and spacious sound thanks to their vented design that allows the back of the earcups to be open to the outside world. This design does mean that there's less passive isolation from external noise and more sound is able to leak out. 

On-ear (supra-aural) headphones

On-ear headphones are generally smaller and lighter than over-ear headphones. Sometimes called 'earpad' or 'earmuff' headphones, these lighter and more flexible designs also come in open and closed variations, but as a rule, on-ear will let in more ambient noise and have greater sound leakage than over-ear headphones.

In-ear headphones

Often called earbuds or even earphones, these tiny headphones fit into the ear canal. The majority of models today are wireless and despite their tiny size, often come loaded with features and tech. Earbuds are the largest growing area of the headphone sector, with just about every headphone maker recognizing the love music fans have for these compact, hands-free designs and introducing increasingly more competitive models to their ranges. 

Why wireless?

Wireless technology has revolutionized the headphone market in recent years, breaking listeners free from being tangled with wires that's physically tethered to a playback device. 

Bluetooth wireless technology has made this freedom possible, while aptX codecs have improved audio signal handling for better sound quality with each new iteration of the wireless short range tech. And there's the promise of a further sound quality boost to come via Snapdragon Sound-compatible devices to deliver true CD-quality (16-bit/44.1kHz) lossless audio over the latest Bluetooth wireless connectivity.

How to choose the best audiophile headphones

When shopping for audiophile headphones, you’ll want to decide on whether you go for either a on-ear or over-ear headphone style, or earbuds. 

Each of our over-ear picks have the best sound quality with wireless and support aptX or LDAC codecs to offer the best signal handling of music files over Bluetooth. These models also come supplied with cables for hard-wired connections and true audiophile listening capabilities via a dedicated headphone amp.

Unlike over-ear headphone designs, the earbuds we've picked cannot be hard wired. Nevertheless, each have the best sound we've heard over Bluetooth and demonstrate the least compromises of any wireless models we've heard to approach audiophile sound quality.

It's difficult to try out headphones before you buy, so make sure you read our full reviews and look out for areas where the reviewer mentions factors like the headband shape and any spring tension it places on your head or ears, or the amount of earcup padding for long-term comfort. Don’t be afraid to pass on headphones you don’t like the aesthetics of, too.

With earbuds, many of the over-ear factors mentioned above should also be considered. Additionally, check reviews for mentions of different sized ear tips so you can adjust them to fit your ear canal size. Water and sweat-resistance is another factor for consideration.

Sound quality is clearly important and all these models provide a balanced sound from the outset. That said, several models have mobile apps that let you tweak the EQ to your liking.

Think about battery life too so that you don't need to recharge too often. And keep in mind that ANC will reduce battery life.

How we test the best audiophile headphones

We thoroughly test every pair of headphones based on a variety of factors, and employ a consistent testing approach so any comparisons with other pairs are trustworthy and fair.

In this case, every pair of audiophile headphones and earbuds have been used over the course of a week for 2 hours at a time. This allows the tester to both gauge the sound quality across a mix of genres and volumes, and to see how comfortable the headphones are when worn for extended periods. We’ll listen to hip-hop, rock, jazz, classical, pop and more to see how each pair performs, and will do the same with movies, podcasts and games, where applicable.

Find out what we listen for during our testing process and how to get the best headphone sound for you.

We also test the effectiveness of features like noise-cancelling in real-life situations, and will make sure manufacturer claims about battery life and Bluetooth range are accurate. Build quality, the ease of setup and any control schemes — including those involving an app — will also be judged.

We rate all our headphones and earbuds on a 5-point system (1 = worst, 5 = best). Products that excel in one or more particular fields and that's rated 4 stars or above may also receive an Editor’s Choice award.

Lee Dunkley
Audio Editor

As a former editor of the U.K.'s Hi-Fi Choice magazine, Lee is passionate about all kinds of audio tech and has been providing sound advice to enable consumers to make informed buying decisions since he joined Which? magazine as a product tester in the 1990s. Lee covers all things audio for Tom's Guide, including headphones, wireless speakers and soundbars and loves to connect and share the mindfulness benefits that listening to music in the very best quality can bring.

With contributions from
  • Stxmahn
    No mention of Bluetooth specs. Makes me wonder. I have an aptx hd source. Obviously, aptx hd headphone will have the highest quality signal. It seems matching Bluetooth codecs is critical for audiophiles. Makes me wonder about the testing also - were the devices tested with compatible hd codecs? Ldac for example doesn't work with most non Sony devices so the signal will downgrade to the lowest common codec.
    Reply
  • Medit8
    There appears to be a serious need here to do solid research about headphones.
    Go to headphones.com and learn about the various parts and functions of, and what makes truly good audiophile headphones. If you just want headphones for background music you don't necessarily want to pay attention to, get Sony or Beats or any highly commercialized gear, but if you want music to surround you as in a concert hall, DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH and buy really good headphones. You can't do it without knowing what's out there at the very high end. For example, Focal headphones made in France. Heard of em, Tom'Guide?
    Reply
  • TheSypher
    Article is kind of joke. Sony, Bose and even sennheiser as audiophile headphones is like Hyundai as a sportcar. Seriously they are not about sound quality, they are about marketing, it's a shame that they got you.
    AND audiophile headphones, and all of them are wireless? Kidding? Looks like you trying to choose something not very disgusting from the catalog of a small electronics store on your street lol.

    Fiio, Meze, Focal, Campfire Audio, iBasso, Audeze, Dunu, Hifiman, Audio Technica, Astell&Kern etc. That the list of brand you need to know, not poor things for background music listed in article.

    Head/earphones with ANC nearly always have not something like really good music quality. Make a true research.

    Peace
    Reply
  • Medit8
    TheSypher said:
    Article is kind of joke. Sony, Bose and even sennheiser as audiophile headphones is like Hyundai as a sportcar. Seriously they are not about sound quality, they are about marketing, it's a shame that they got you.
    AND audiophile headphones, and all of them are wireless? Kidding? Looks like you trying to choose something not very disgusting from the catalog of a small electronics store on your street lol.

    Fiio, Meze, Focal, Campfire Audio, iBasso, Audeze, Dunu, Hifiman, Audio Technica, Astell&Kern etc. That the list of brand you need to know, not poor things for background music listed in article.

    Head/earphones with ANC nearly always have not something like really good music quality. Make a true research.

    Peace
    I have Focal Clear, discovered on headphones.com. Well aware of the marketing going on here. But you'll never see Focal reviewed here which is sad.
    Reply
  • sonicmustard
    Tom's Guide reviewed the Focal Clear sometime ago.
    Reply
  • sonicmustard
    Medit8 said:
    There appears to be a serious need here to do solid research about headphones.
    Go to headphones.com and learn about the various parts and functions of, and what makes truly good audiophile headphones. If you just want headphones for background music you don't necessarily want to pay attention to, get Sony or Beats or any highly commercialized gear, but if you want music to surround you as in a concert hall, DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH and buy really good headphones. You can't do it without knowing what's out there at the very high end. For example, Focal headphones made in France. Heard of em, Tom'Guide?

    We reviewed the Focal Clear headphones a while ago. We're in the process of updating our audio guides and looking to include a wider range of headphone models to include a broader range of brands and that fit with audiophile sensibilities, including wired models. Look out for our regular headphone updates in the coming weeks.
    Reply
  • sonicmustard
    Stxmahn said:
    No mention of Bluetooth specs. Makes me wonder. I have an aptx hd source. Obviously, aptx hd headphone will have the highest quality signal. It seems matching Bluetooth codecs is critical for audiophiles. Makes me wonder about the testing also - were the devices tested with compatible hd codecs? Ldac for example doesn't work with most non Sony devices so the signal will downgrade to the lowest common codec.

    We're looking to bring greater transparency to our guides to help buyers make informed buying choices. In the meantime, you should be able to find further information in the review itself by clicking on the model name link at the beginning of each or the 'full review' link at the end of each review.

    We test wireless headphones and earbuds using the highest bit rate and resolution streams available from services such as Apple Music and TIDAL as well as popular services such as Spotify.
    Reply
  • sjejjdmdenjoyer72
    I had the Sony WH-1000XM4 and their audio was alright at best, and although it is pretty good, there are definitely better choices, and it does NOT deserve to be on a top headphones for audiophile list! Please do not buy the Sony's, as they are very mediocre in terms of sound quality.
    Reply