To The Future: Microsoft’s Skymarket, and Palm

By Don Reisinger, published on December 19, 2008
Source: Tom's Guide US | Keywords: , , | Themes: Smartphones

11. To The Future: Microsoft’s Skymarket, and Palm

Microsoft is also working on an App Store to compete with Apple’s, Google’s, and RIM’s.  Reportedly known as Skymarket, little information is available about the store, other than rumors that the company ostensibly plans to launch it with the upcoming release of Windows Mobile 7 sometime in 2009. Other than that, Microsoft has been tight-lipped about its app store’s future.

Palm’s App Store

Palm also launched an App Store in late December for its own brand of devices (those that run Windows Mobile and those that use the Palm OS).  The company claims to have about 5,000 apps available, 80% of which are free. While I haven’t had the opportunity to delve into the App Store, it’s possible that it can play a major role in saving the company’s embattled Treo and in helping it achieve great heights in the space.  Time will tell.


Which App Store takes the top prize as the best in its class?  Unsurprisingly, we need to give the nod to Apple’s iTunes App Store. With a slew of applications, outstanding hardware sales, and unprecedented success, the future is bright for Apple. Indeed, the shadow it’s casting over its competitors is big and daunting. Will they be able to compete?  Well, there’s potential—there’d be even more chance for them to topple Apple if they pooled their resources.


But until then, Apple’s store reigns supreme.

Comments | Print | Send to a friend

Sponsored links

Comments

frozenlead 12/19/2008 11:55 PM
Hide
-1+

I believe the most successful application store would be the Internet. It's been allowing you to download things for a good many years for your PC, your laptop, your phone, your PDA, your GPS, etc. These app stores are just proprietary and stealing people's money.

Claimintru 12/21/2008 4:43 AM
Hide
-0+

How is it fair to rate an online app store suchas RIM's that is Developer driven, when the only App-capable handset has been out for a matter of weeks, vs how many Iphones have been in existence as well as Ipod Touches?

Of course if a company developes an official app store after delivering millions of handsets, it will takeoff better than started an app store soon as you start handset sales.

Not like I give a damn about RIM's though. Just saying

fantom889 12/22/2008 5:54 PM
Hide
-0+

Interesting how you are quoting numbers from October. Since then, all have video/music players. Stores are now online that provide much improved applications for the G1. They are very promising. There in lies the secret to the G1. It allows for developers to compete. The G1 is basically a small linux pc in your hand. The Iphone and Rim products are Mac and Windows mini PC's, but locked. Their app stores perform better simply by controlling the app sources and charging for most of them. A built in monopoly, if you will. G1 is truly open. With some basic knowledge of Linux / Android, anyone can write a program. It is very much a phone for the I.T. professional/hacker/enthusiast. Telnet, wifi tracking, war driving, server access,email, port scannning and network trouble shooting are just the tip of the iceberg. The ability to add or exchange memory without buying a new phone is huge.The usb function of the G1 is understated. The Windows OS can be mounted by the G1 allowing the exchange of files. Great for back up, mp3files and the like. The G1 could be used to restore and fix a hard drive with a simple user app that allows line commands. The Iphone is a great product and very user friendly. The typical Iphone user doesn't understand half the features and isnt aware of the true potential of the Iphone. They just want it to do the things they need it for. Makes perfect sense. The real mystery is the lack of Flash player availability for all of these devices. Iphone and RIM won't allow it. G1 will. Adobe wants to. The browsers are crippled without it! The market is wide open for these products. They are changing the world.

el fiendo 12/22/2008 6:38 PM
Hide
-0+

I'm sorry but this is ridiculous. As Claimintru pointed out, the Blackberry has only been on the market for a month. If you wanted to do a comparison, it should have been everyone's standings in their first month. To give such dismal scores as 1 and 2 for simply not being on the market as long as the others is wildly unprofessional. Also, when you mention "By that logic, some might say that Google and RIM are on the same level since they both offer just one device that’s capable of working with their respective stores", what other way is there to look at it? The G1 doesn't automatically get a leg up for any reason. Last I checked, 1 was equal to 1. The iPhone barely gets a leg up, but the iPod touch should be included as you correctly did. However, in defense of the G1 and the Storm, both are newcomers compared to how long Apple has been creating devices to work with their applications.

AppBeacon 12/22/2008 9:53 PM
Hide
-0+

Maybe another question to ask is :

"Can your app store knockoffs beat my app store knockoffs".

Our knock off, like several others, aims to make it easier for people for find apps for their iPhone and iPod Touches. The ecosystems growing up around these new phones is amazing. Hopefully, all together we can serve the users better and help the developers of these apps make a good living.

Anonymous 12/22/2008 10:35 PM
Hide
--1+

iphone/itouch app store?
it's is a mess. When it first come out, it's just a bunch of random apps in a few categories order by name and there is no option to sort by other way.
yes, there is basic keyward search and top 25 free and paid apps...
but that's about it. user review...just like amazon...nothing new here
What's so good about the store? I don't get it.
iphone/itouch apps store is successful all because of the good apps on it. The store front is a mess...and there are so many bad apps...
it's getting longer and longer to scroll through all the junk everyday.
They should sub category all the apps so we seach by app function keyword rather just by name.

Comments are closed on this page.

Sponsored links