Galaxy S9 Price Leaked, And It's Awfully High

Samsung isn't talking about its Galaxy S9 pricing yet, but a new leak suggests it could be considerably higher than its predecessor.

Credit: Mobile Fun

(Image credit: Mobile Fun)

MORE: Galaxy S9 Leaked Specs: Here's What to Expect

The big update this year, according to reports, will come to the Galaxy S9's rear-facing camera, which will reportedly offer dual apertures and much faster auto-focus. Only the Galaxy S9+ is expected to sport dual lenses. Samsung is also reportedly planning to move the fingerprint sensor below the camera, making it easier to reach. 

On the software side, Samsung could be planning an update that comes with more artificial intelligence features. The software could provide more contextual information based on how you interact with its software.

Samsung is expected to unveil the Galaxy S9 and Galaxy S9+ on Feb. 25 and will likely make pre-orders available in early March. Samsung should make the Galaxy S9 line available in mid-March.

Don Reisinger is CEO and founder of D2 Tech Agency. A communications strategist, consultant, and copywriter, Don has also written for many leading technology and business publications including CNET, Fortune Magazine, The New York Times, Forbes, Computerworld, Digital Trends, TechCrunch and Slashgear. He has also written for Tom's Guide for many years, contributing hundreds of articles on everything from phones to games to streaming and smart home.

  • ramsus78
    Wow, a whole $20 more . . . . how cataclysmic.
    Reply
  • ace1031
    Which nutcase wrote this one-sided "article". Is it a release from the Apple cult club? When Apple releases its outrageously priced - $1299 phone these writers grovel. Samsung on the other hand, cannot dare to put in a $20 price hike. Look at the screaming headlines - " awfully high"
    Shameful pandering!!
    Reply
  • Brad_53
    2.28% price increase? That's pretty much inflation for 2017 (a quick looks suggest 2.1%).
    Reply
  • Brad_53
    This site is closing to losing me as a reader with sensationalist titles like these.
    Reply