Google wants to better secure your messages by standardizing encryption

Google Messages logo on phone screen.
(Image credit: sdx15 | Shutterstock)

End-to-end encryption is pretty important in the world of messaging, because there’s no telling who might be out there trying to read your communications. The problem is that those services tend to operate on their own, with their own encryption and restricting your messaging to others on the same platform. Google thinks it's about time that changed.

Google has announced its support for a new standard that would enable better interoperability between different messaging platforms. Specifically the RFC 9420 specifications of the Internet Engineering Task Force’s (IETF) Messaging Layer Security (MLS) standard. 

Google claims that it supports legislation that pushes for better interoperability between large encrypted messaging apps, like the European Union’s Digital Market Act. However, it notes that the diversity in platforms, and the protocols they use, would make that near-impossible to accomplish without some kind of industry standard.

Anything less than that, Google says, would end up lowering security and raising implementation costs. Group Messaging in particular would be impossible across platforms, since each message and file sent would need to be encrypted and delivered multiple times to account for each service’s protocols. 

The benefits to standardizing MLS means developers wouldn't need to spend time and resources on their own in-house end-to-end encryption, while eliminating the security concerns that may arise from trying to mash existing services and protocols together in a web of interoperability. Which sounds like a great idea, but it will rely on everyone agreeing that this is a good idea.

The RCS problem 

Take RCS messaging, for example. On its own the idea is pretty sound, with the system offering a far more advanced and secure way to send messages compared to SMS and MMS. You can send images, videos, files, text, and emoji with end-to-end encryption, keeping it safe from prying eyes. Unfortunately, not everyone likes RCS. 

Apple, for example, has regularly refused to implement RCS, regardless of how well it might improve communication between iPhones and Android devices. In fact, Apple has a habit of ignoring standards unless someone forces it to implement them, as we’ve seen with the iPhone and USB-C

The major difference in this case is that there are dozens of encrypted messaging apps with significant user bases, and they’d all need to get on board. Getting that many people to agree on something is pretty difficult, no matter what the resulting benefits might be. 

How does this affect users?

When it comes to a universal encryption standard, the primary benefit to users would be better support across different messaging platforms. By ensuring every service's encryption is the same, it's one step closer to offering secure communication between platforms — something that wouldn't be possible if everyone does their own thing.

If Google's dream comes to pass, you could potentially be able to use iMessage to send encrypted communication to Facebook Messenger, WhatsApp, or any number of rival platforms.

Interoperability will require more than just matching encryption, and it'll be up to developers to actually bridge the gap between them — whether by choice or because the law forces them to. But, if Google's dream comes to pass, you could potentially be able to use iMessage to send encrypted communication to Facebook Messenger, WhatsApp, or any number of rival platforms. 

Of course ,there will no doubt need to be measures in place to ensure the security of the new unified encryption protocol. If a hole is found in one service, it's likely that it would be present in all of them, giving bad actors access to a trove of messages they may not have had access to before.

That's especially important to think about given world governments' ongoing attempts to compromise encryption for their own benefit. Like the measures being proposed in the U.K., which are so severe Apple has threatened to pull iMessage and FaceTime from the region.

But at the same time by opting for an open standard, you've got an entire industry combining their resources to ensure that doesn't happen. Rather than different smaller groups working on their own thing. That, combined with the work of white hat hackers, may even mean security issues are patched up quickly and efficiently.

That's assuming everything goes to plan, and different organizations are willing to cooperate and collaborate effectively. Because as much as a universal encrypted messaging standard sounds like a good idea, it’ll be interesting to see how much support a move like this will get in practice. Having the backing of Google is something, but it’s not enough to guarantee success. 

More from Tom's Guide

TOPICS
Tom Pritchard
UK Phones Editor

Tom is the Tom's Guide's UK Phones Editor, tackling the latest smartphone news and vocally expressing his opinions about upcoming features or changes. It's long way from his days as editor of Gizmodo UK, when pretty much everything was on the table. He’s usually found trying to squeeze another giant Lego set onto the shelf, draining very large cups of coffee, or complaining about how terrible his Smart TV is.

Read more
RCS messaging on an iPhone
Forget green bubbles — iPhones will soon get encrypted RCS messaging to Androids
An illustration of a person holding a smartphone with a padlock in front of speech bubbles on the screen
The best encrypted messaging apps in 2025
How to tell if you've been blocked on WhatsApp
The best WhatsApp alternatives in 2025
ExpressVPN
ExpressVPN's latest upgrade secures its spot as the most quantum-safe VPN
Proton VPN logo and in-app screenshots
"If you control online, you control everything" – Proton is taking the fight to internet censorship
Cartoon of person peering through US flag
Western governments want your data and big tech is happy to provide – how to slow them down
Latest in Phones
iPhone 17 Air render
iPhone 17 Air — new survey could be bad news for Apple's super thin iPhone
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs S25 Plus vs S25
Satellite messaging on Google Pixel 9 and Samsung Galaxy S25 just landed on 3 more carriers
back of Iris Pixel 9a
The Google Pixel 9a is lacking one of the Pixel 9’s best safety features — here’s what we know
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge back
Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge benchmark shows it won’t scrimp on power
vivo x200 ultra camera array
Vivo’s next premium phone could have a camera unlike anything we’ve seen before — here’s how
Google Pixel 9a with thumbs up and thumbs down icons
Google Pixel 9a — 5 reasons to buy and 3 reasons to skip
Latest in News
iPhone 17 Air render
iPhone 17 Air — new survey could be bad news for Apple's super thin iPhone
Segway g30lp
Segway recalls 220,000 electric scooters - what to do if yours is on the list
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs S25 Plus vs S25
Satellite messaging on Google Pixel 9 and Samsung Galaxy S25 just landed on 3 more carriers
L-R: Claude (Marco Calvani), Danny (Colman Domingo), Kate (Tina Fey) and Jack (Will Forte) have their bags packed for Netflix's "The Four Seasons"
Netflix just teased a new comedy series starring Tina Fey, Steve Carrell and Colman Domingo — and we already have a release date
back of Iris Pixel 9a
The Google Pixel 9a is lacking one of the Pixel 9’s best safety features — here’s what we know
Razer Blade
Nvidia's DLSS 4 demo in a Razer Blade 16 with RTX 5090 gives me hope again for next-gen gaming laptops