ATSC 3.0 Tuners — do you really need one on your 2024 TV?

TV with live broadcasting channels on wall in living room
(Image credit: Future)

When it comes to modern TVs, the ATSC 3.0 Tuner is among the few make or break-it features that allow a display to truly stand out and shine. Still, while quite the addition, even some of the best TVs don't come equipped with an ATSC 3.0 Tuner, case in point being the TCL QM8 Mini-LED TV, which adds to the speculation of its overarching necessity. 

But, what exactly is an ATSC 3.0 Tuner? In simple terms, ATSC 3.0 transmitters allow users access to the digital broadcasting standard of 3.0 first introduced back in 2020. ATSC 3.0, otherwise known as NextGen TV, essentially supports video broadcasts of up to 4K at 120 frames per second in HDR and in wide color gamut, which is quite the benefit — that is, of course, if 4K broadcasts were all that common. 

Herein lies the conundrum. Do you really need an ATSC 3.0 Tuner? Maybe even more importantly, should you have to look for a TV that supports one? With streaming apps like YouTube TV and Peacock paving the way for digital broadcasting without an antenna, you may not need that NextGen TV entry fee, but there could still be some benefits in the long run. 

What is the ATSC 3.0 standard? 

ATSC 3.0 branding over broadcasting towers

(Image credit: Future)

First things first, we have to understand what ATSC 3.0 really is. ATSC stands for American Televisions Systems Committee, a large group corralling TV manufacturers, broadcasting clients, equipment makers, and more. This group maintains the over-the-air broadcasting requirements on a technical level. 

Going even deeper into the rabbit hole, ATSC 3.0 is a new digital format, one that is taking over from the previous 1.0 (2.0 never made it past the design stage). Think of ATSC 3.0 as the PlayStation 5 or Xbox Series X of over-the-air broadcast TV — hence its NextGen TV moniker — allowing for support of TV broadcasts at 4K/120fps, with HDR enabled, and audio enhancements to boot, among other improvements. 

The main draw for ATSC 3.0 is that it brings orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM), which is a digital data transmission technology used in mobile wireless networks and even WiFi. It essentially makes broadcast TV much less prone to interference, leading to a less corrupted signal, frequent blocky pictures, and that all-too familiar “no signal” error. 

Mohu Leaf Supreme Pro Paper-Thin Indoor TV Antenna: was $89 now $69

Mohu Leaf Supreme Pro Paper-Thin Indoor TV Antenna: was $89 now $69 

The Mohu Leaf Supreme Pro is a worthwhile investment for those looking to get into over-the-air broadcasting on NextGen TV. As an indoor antenna, you don't have to worry about setting it up outside on top of your house, making it perfect for apartment dwellers. It's equipped with FirstStage amplification, gifting it a 65-mile range and a strong signal reception to boot.  

To access this next generation of broadcast TV, all you need is an ATSC 3.0 Tuner, which many modern TVs now come equipped with, and one of the best TV antennas, which usually only cost around $70 to $100. The service itself, NextGen TV, is totally free and gives users access to a wide range of over-the-air TV channels — with a catch (or, more accurately, several catches).

Airwaves of setbacks on ATSC 3.0  

While there are benefits aplenty for going all-in on the NextGen TV movement with an ATSC 3.0 Tuner, there are still several debilitating issues that make it hard to suggest the jump right now circa 2024. 

One of main drawbacks is the fact that NextGen TV itself isn’t available everywhere just yet. While most of the main cities across America do have coverage, like New York, Los Angeles, Austin, Chicago, and more, several cities are still left out of the equation. You can check on the NextGen TV site to see if your market is available, but coverage is rolling out steadily. 

NextGen TV broadcasting markets on website

(Image credit: Future)

Additionally, while NextGen TV touts over-the-air and free 4K broadcasts, there aren’t a lot available just yet. Meanwhile, you could simply opt for something far less tedious (though a bit more expensive) in a streaming alternative like YouTube TV or Peacock, both of which offer 4K HDR broadcast coverage across certain (but not all) content.

And, while the benefits in audio are certainly viable for turning to ATSC 3.0, main among them being Dolby’s AC-4 audio compression technology for 7.1.4 Dolby Atmos surround sound and enhanced dialog, you could also simply nab one of the best Dolby Atmos soundbars for the same coverage. Again, far more expensive, but much more reliable.

Are ATSC 3.0 Tuners worth it?  

The decision for leveraging an ATSC 3.0 Tuner really comes down to your own general necessities and budget. The over-the-air broadcasting standard might prove to be rewarding for those wanting to skip out on shelling over $80 a month to the likes of YouTube TV for access to live broadcasting. 

For those willing to stick with it in the long run, the heralding of more 4K broadcasts and even 8K content in the far future could also be a silver lining. While I myself may not be in the NextGen TV boat, you may find it worthwhile for saving money and gaining access to live content, like sports and local news. 

But, as of yet, I feel  there’s no real reason to dive into ATSC 3.0 and NextGen TV when there’s better options out there that are much more reliable. Plus, 4K broadcasts do seem quite exciting, but for the most part this higher resolution is sequestered to merely advertisements. 

Add to that the fact that LG 2024 TVs won’t even have ATSC 3.0 tuners, as it is in an ongoing patent dispute with Constellation Designs LLC, and there’s no real reason to seek out the best TVs with ATSC 3.0 tuners. You can most certainly live without the NextGen TV movement for a little while longer, until 4K and 8K broadcasts begin their inevitable rise.  

More from Tom's Guide

Ryan Epps
Staff Writer

Ryan Epps is a Staff Writer under the TV/AV section at Tom's Guide focusing on TVs and projectors. When not researching PHOLEDs and writing about the next major innovation in the projector space, he's consuming random anime from the 90's, playing Dark Souls 3 again, or reading yet another Haruki Murakami novel. 

  • Tom Electrical Engineer
    The article omits any mention of DRM Encryption or the need for an Internet connection to decode it. While the Developers are using the excuse of the need for DRM Encryption to thwart Pirate rebroadcasts, the true goal is to make Over-The-Air broadcasts Pay Per View. It will also stop "Time Shifting" home recordings and In Home Wi-Fi TV, etc. Americans will lose the benefits of the educational, news, disaster and other information that Unites us. DRM Encryption is a threat to American society as we know it! Please watch the anti-DRM advocates on YouTube, such as The Antenna Man, Lon.tv and the Cord Cutter channel. Please sign the FCC petition they promote and comment to the FCC.
    Reply