Skip to main content

MacBook M1 destroys Windows on ARM — this is embarrassing

M1 MacBook beats Windows on Arm again
(Image credit: Tom's Guide/Microsoft)

Another day, another win for the M1 MacBooks. Today's news comes from a new comparison between the new MacBook Air M1 and Microsoft's Surface Pro X, to see how Apple and Microsoft fare when their ARM-based laptops are pitted against each other.

According to PC World, the M1 MacBook Air just embarrasses the Surface Pro X, one of the machines we didn't compare to in our MacBook Air with M1 review. And these tests re-emphasize what we've already learned: that the new MacBook is one of the best laptops around.

There are a couple caveats to note. PC World used a Surface Pro X with the original SQ1 chip and not the new SQ2 (which they could not procure). This may not be the end of the world, as the newer chip only has a small performance upgrade, from 3GHz in the original to 3.15 GHz in the SQ2.

That being said, a previous report showed where the M1 MacBooks beat the SQ2 Surface Pro, too. Also, we're seeing numbers that reflect Microsoft's new 64-bit X86 application emulator, which is in beta preview — and Microsoft says it should improve.

The losses for ARM on Windows begin with the Geekbench 5 test, where the Surface Pro X posted a multi-core score of 2,734, a mere fraction of the 7,454 from the MacBook Air M1. PC World does not specify which versions of Geekbench they're comparing, but since Geekbench advises how to properly compare scores — you can't put Geekbench 5.3 from a Mac against GB 5.3 from a PC, for example — we're going to have to assume they're using proper comparisons.

Then, on the Cinebench R23 test, the M1 MacBook Air posted another mighty score 6,838, to the Surface Pro X's 1,604. It should be noted that this is one of the tests where the Surface Pro X doesn't have an optimized version for ARM, but the Mac does. While that means that the Surface Pro X could do better with a new version of the software, it's a little disappointing to see that it still doesn't have that application, despite the Pro X coming out more than a year ago, while the M1 MacBooks are still about a month old.

There's more bad news for Windows on ARM. While the M1 MacBook Air could run Rise of the Tomb Raider at a strong 60.6 fps (at 1280 x 800, medium), the Surface Pro X failed to run the game all together.

The PC World tests also show a win for the Mac on the Handbrake video conversion tool, which wasn't a huge surprise considering how the Handbrake results looked in our review.

This all shows that the Windows on ARM project has a lot of work to do to catch up with Apple. Not just with performance overall, but with the speed of application emulators, as Apple's Rosetta 2 has shown strong results in our testing. If Microsoft's x86 on ARM emulation improves, there should be a chance.

Henry T. Casey

Henry is an editor writer at Tom’s Guide covering streaming media, laptops and Apple. Prior to joining Tom's Guide — where he's the self-described Rare Oreo Expert — he reviewed software and hardware for TechRadar Pro, and interviewed artists for Patek Philippe International Magazine. You can find him at your local pro wrestling events, and looking for the headphone adapter that he unplugged from his iPhone.

  • cirdecus
    You're comparing apples to oranges when you pit this thing against the Surface Pro X and then say "it's one of the best laptops around". Compare it to the Surface Pro 7 then. It's fine to say that when comparing Microsoft's ARM tablet to Apples M1 chip, the M1 is far better, but that's not what you're suggesting when you write an article like this. The Surface Pro X was a turtle since it came out. It was clearly a "test" ARM product by Microsoft. It's not a flagship product like this one is for Apple. Those using this thing will be comparing it to the Pro 7 and it's capabilities.
    Reply
  • nervousstate
    admin said:
    The M1 MacBook Air just thrashed the Surface Pro X, again — benchmark results explained.

    MacBook M1 destroys Windows on ARM — this is embarrassing : Read more
    If you look at Ryzen 3000 laptops vs Ryzen 4000 laptops, just one year later... You will see that Ryzen 4000 also embarrassed the Ryzen 3000 laptops.

    You are comparing a product released in 2019, based in a 2018 processor to a laptop that was released a couple weeks ago along side a process that was also released a couple weeks ago. If you recall Moore's Law, this is what is suppose to happen. Intel has been able to deliver that generational computational improvement in the last decade, but Qualcomm has and certainly AMD's Ryzen has shown that AMD64 (x86-64) can do that as well. I anticipate that ARM on windows will improve and will be opened up, and ARM on macs will Improve and become more locked down. Then RISC-V will come in an decimate both in 5 years.
    Reply
  • Jbelkin
    WEll, the ONLY reason the Surface exists is corporate ego. MS got it in their head the ONLY reason for the failure of WIN tablets & $1k+ WIN laptops is because of manufacturer fail so MS decided to show them "how it's done." Of course, they couldn't jut put out a WIN tablet, it would be too easy to measure sales against the juggernaut iPad ... and of course, they couldn't do a $1k+ laptop as that "might show up their hardware partners" (also easy to compare to the $1k+ laptop market leader by far, Apple) so they picked a middle ground - a detachable laptop ... which would be okay but MS corporate ego wouldn't allow it to be priced below anything Apple ... basically there is no reason for the Surface t exist other than corporate ego.Mo one has ever said, I'd really like a super expensive slow WIN laptop that detaches into pieces ...

    MacBook M1 destroys Windows on ARM — this is embarrassing : Read more
    Reply