Verizon Faces Lawsuit For Defending Alleged Pirates

Verizon Wireless is facing a lawsuit filed by a group of adult movie companies for protecting alleged BitTorrent pirates. They claim that the Big Red's refusal to hand over personal details via court-ordered subpoenas is more than an attempt to protect its customers – it's to protect profits generated from BitTorrent infringements.

Verizon's reluctance to hand over personal details in John Doe witch hunts isn't anything new – the company has clearly expressed that IP addresses linked to copyright infringement doesn't necessarily mean the subscriber is the one breaking the law. Verizon follows the latest trend that anyone accessing the wireless network could be held accountable, but it's impossible to narrow it down to just one individual. Is it the family's son? The leeching neighbor next door?

Unfortunately, in many cases, the consumer associated with a specific IP address is the one who gets sued even though he/she may not be guilty. This is how the RIAA and MPAA has scared millions out of Americans over the years, threatening to sue for millions if the accused doesn't settle for a lesser amount.

Up until now, Verizon doesn't play that game, refusing to fork over information that could allow for the "harassment" of its customers. "[The subpoena] seeks information that is protected from disclosure by third parties’ rights of privacy and protections guaranteed by the first amendment,” Verizon's counsel informed the copyright holders in a recent case.

Fed up with Verizon's stance, Malibu Media, Patrick Collins and Third Degree Films have filed a complaint against the company at a federal court in Texas, asking the court to hold the Big Red in contempt and force Verizon into answering the subpoenas.

"Verizon objects to the subpoenas on various grounds, all of which lack merit," the lawsuit states. "Accordingly, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court overrule each of Verizon’s objections, compel immediate compliance with Plaintiffs’ subpoenas and hold Verizon in contempt for failing to obey the subpoenas."

The complaint goes on to describe Verizon's refusal as an act in bad faith, that the company expects to continue to profit from BitTorrent infringement "at the expense of other, lower-tier ISPs and the consuming public at large." There are no incentives for ISPs like Verizon to aggressively identify infringers on their network, and said ISPs and their cohorts allegedly even enjoy virtual immunity from liability under the DMCA and other laws.

"This scenario presents multiple concerns of fairness and accountability," the lawsuit states.

Verizon is one of many who have chosen to participate in the Copyright Alert System plan which will send warnings to customers who download pirated content from peer-to-peer networks. Verizon plans to throttle the more stubborn downloaders, but only temporary. At no point will an alleged user's information be handed over for legal purposes.

"We believe this program offers the best approach to the problem of illegal file sharing and, importantly, is one that respects the privacy and rights of our subscribers. It also provides a mechanism for helping people to find many great sources of legal content,” Verizon said.

The full report can be accessed via TorrentFreak here.

Create a new thread in the Streaming Video & TVs forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
Comment from the forums
    Your comment
    Top Comments
  • wannabepro
    Bravo Verizon.
  • sliem
    Screw RIAA and MPAA!
  • axiler
    Just gained a whole new level of respect for Verizon.
  • Other Comments
  • wannabepro
    Bravo Verizon.
  • sliem
    Screw RIAA and MPAA!
  • cats_Paw
    Verizon, you got a provider in Poland?

    If we dont support this sort of behaviour, soon the Internet will become a very very dark and censored place. I dont like piracy much myself, but i have to say that many companies flat out lie to consumers, and its not like you can return the game to the local store if you do not agree with the "Terms of Agreement".

    I mean, where can i read those before i actually buy the game? Or, why can companies change their Terms of agreement whenever they add any nw contenet (and the changes have nothing to do with the contenet but rather with how much information they can gather on you)?

    Those abuses are punished by law in EVERY other sector, but somehow not in gaming. On the other hand, Pirates are treated like common criminals.

    So verytime somone does something that "matters" in keeping customers safe from a fraudulent system, i am quite happy about it.