The top Android chipset is getting a new name
Qualcomm's changing the naming convention for its Snapdragon silicon
Here at Tom’s Guide our expert editors are committed to bringing you the best news, reviews and guides to help you stay informed and ahead of the curve!
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Daily (Mon-Sun)
Tom's Guide Daily
Sign up to get the latest updates on all of your favorite content! From cutting-edge tech news and the hottest streaming buzz to unbeatable deals on the best products and in-depth reviews, we’ve got you covered.
Weekly on Thursday
Tom's AI Guide
Be AI savvy with your weekly newsletter summing up all the biggest AI news you need to know. Plus, analysis from our AI editor and tips on how to use the latest AI tools!
Weekly on Friday
Tom's iGuide
Unlock the vast world of Apple news straight to your inbox. With coverage on everything from exciting product launches to essential software updates, this is your go-to source for the latest updates on all the best Apple content.
Weekly on Monday
Tom's Streaming Guide
Our weekly newsletter is expertly crafted to immerse you in the world of streaming. Stay updated on the latest releases and our top recommendations across your favorite streaming platforms.
Join the club
Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards.
When the Samsung Galaxy S22 debuts next year, it's likely to feature a Snapdragon system-on-chip from Qualcomm. But that chipset, which should also power many of the best Android phones slated for release in 2022, is going to feature a new name.
Qualcomm announced today (Nov. 22) that it's simplifying the name of its mobile chipsets. Gone are the three-digit numbers we've grown accustomed to — the Snapdragon 888 is the current top-of-the-line silicon from Qualcomm, for example. Instead, future Snapdragon silicon will feature a single-digit series and a generation number.
The name change will start with the Snapdragon 8 series of chips, presumably when the next chipset is introduced later this month at Qualcomm's annual Snapdragon summit.
Qualcomm's announcement confirms a rumor that had suggested a new naming convention was in the works for its chipsets. Earlier this month, leaker Ice Universe tweeted that the next frontline silicon from the chip maker would be called the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, and not the Snapdragon 898, as had been widely assumed.
This is no joke. Qualcomm seems to really name Snapdragon 898 "Snapdragon 8 gen1"November 15, 2021
Whatever name Qualcomm ultimately uses, the new chipset is expected to power Samsung's next flagship phone, since new Qualcomm chips typically make their debut in whatever Galaxy S model Samsung introduces. However, another rumor suggests that Motorola and Xiaomi could unveil phones this year that are powered by the new silicon.
Leaked benchmarks for Samsung's next chip haven't pointed to big performance gains, though that's not likely to be an area of concern. For starters, Geekbench test results are only one indicator of speed and not necessarily the last word on performance. For another, the devices whose results have leaked may not have been fully optimized for performance.
In addition to announcing its new naming plans, Qualcomm said that Snapdragon will now be its own brand. In addition, because of 5G's ubiquity on Snapdragon chips, Qualcomm will no longer call it out. "Moving forward, with Snapdragon connected platforms, 5G will be a given," the company said in a statement.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
Philip Michaels is a Managing Editor at Tom's Guide. He's been covering personal technology since 1999 and was in the building when Steve Jobs showed off the iPhone for the first time. He's been evaluating smartphones since that first iPhone debuted in 2007, and he's been following phone carriers and smartphone plans since 2015. He has strong opinions about Apple, the Oakland Athletics, old movies and proper butchery techniques. Follow him at @PhilipMichaels.

