Bigfoot Networks' Killer M1 NIC

By Ed Tittel and Toby Digby, published on April 28, 2008
Source: Tom's Guide | Keywords: , , | Themes: Networking

1. Offload Engine with a Genuine Vengeance

The principle has been around since the earliest days of Internet access: offload protocol processing from the CPU, and you can sometimes realize substantial networking performance gains as a result. In fact, this writer worked for a long-defunct company named Excelan in the mid-1980s (purchased by Novell in 1989), which offered the first IBM PC-compatible TCP/IP NIC. The system included an 80186 processor, ran the TCP/IP stack and allowed underpowered 8086 and 80286 PCs to interoperate with mainframes and minicomputers on a more-or-less equal footing. Today, this technology usually goes by the TOE acronym, which stands for TCP/IP Offload Engine, and is a standard feature for the network interfaces designed for use on server machines.

killer m1 nic

The custom K-Blade heatsink emblazons this card with a Killer “K” knife symbol, and was custom designed for Bigfoot Networks by Thermaltake

Rather than supplementing one or more underpowered CPUs these days, however, TOE units are designed to enable servers to maximize bandwidth consumption and throughput on gigabit (or even 10-gigabit) Ethernet networks. It’s still the case that handling TCP/IP communications consumes significant processing power, and for server computers whose productivity must in part be a function of how well (and how much) they can use the network, the added expense of this kind of network interface is easy to justify, and delivers measurable benefits to the users they serve.

It’s more difficult to justify this kind of capability for a client computer, where built-in gigabit Ethernet (GbE) interfaces are the norm, and where network performance seldom means enough to justify the $90 and up that a GbE TOE interface will typically cost. That explains why Bigfoot Networks has created a product that targets a potentially lucrative market segment—namely, online gamers with broadband connections (NPD Group reports that 62% of all video gamers report that they also play online and 19% of gamers participate in massively multiplayer online role play games (MMORPGs). For this group of users, reducing delays between their desktop machines and the servers with which they must communicate while gaming online can confer a noticeable competitive advantage. It also explains why Bigfoot has endowed the M1 model of the aptly (or at least humorously) named “Killer NIC” with a variety of powerful and interesting features. We’ll cover these in detail in the next segment of this story.

Comments | Print | Send to a friend
Google Ads
Comments


Deleted profile 28/04/2008 11:26
Hide
Um they use the vendors tool to monitor their ping times? With margin of error and internet as a fluctuating cloud of chaos I fail to see these differences as valid.
trevorvdw 28/04/2008 11:47
Hide
trevorvdw
How about testing it against a decent pci nic instead of onboard... that'd be interesting.
Blackdog139 29/04/2008 12:48
Hide
Blackdog139
That price has to come down to at least 100$ before gamers can afford it! C'mon 200 to 250$,that's just ludicrist.
VTOLfreak 29/04/2008 12:49
Hide
VTOLfreak
I'd like to see this thing compared to a Intel PRO/1000 PT. I've added these adapters to most of my systems and saw a noticable improvement in CPU usage and network utilisation compared to the onboard ones. I'm sure most readers will agree that comparing the M1 to the crappy onboard nic of the mobo is not a fair fight. On a last note: Why is a $200 nic still using PCI instead of PCI-E 1x?
Deleted profile 29/04/2008 01:50
Hide
What this article fails to mention is that this NIC is one picky pos about what motherboards it will work on. I got mine a few weeks after it came out and it was a disaster. After 3 RMAs and since, 2 motherboard upgrades later, I STILL cannot get mine to function reliably. And even when the hardware would be detected and the drivers/firmware would install correctly, it did odd things like randomly disconnect me from the network, pause traffic at odd times and the tray app would crash or act strangely. Their tech support tried, I believe, in good faith but in MY experience, the thing is extremely flaky at best. And lastly, when on those rare instances when I could get it to work, I noticed no tangible improvement in my games and in a couple it increased my latency. Some people swear by the thing, I just swore at it...

Note You are going to post a comment as anonymous.



Google Ads