Skip to main content

The Great Android Browser Face-Off

Crowning a Winner

So which browser takes the crown? Well, it’s not quite that simple. Each browser has its own strengths and weaknesses, making it better suited for some tasks but less suited for others. Which browser you’ll want to use depends on what you want to do with it. Who says you can’t install two (or more) browsers anyway?

That said, in First Place, we have the Default Browser! Just kidding. It’s pretty clear that the default browser doesn’t do much other than come pre-installed. Its slow speed, shaky performance, and weak feature list make it a pretty abysmal first choice; however, rumor would have it that Google is finally looking to merge Chrome into Android in the near future.

Both Opera and Firefox allow you to sync things like passwords and history between your mobile and desktop browsers.

Both Opera and Firefox allow you to sync things like passwords and history between your mobile and desktop browsers.

Until then, both Opera Mobile and Firefox make excellent choices if you already use one of their respective desktop browsers, thanks to their syncing features. If you’re not an Opera/Firefox fan, Dolphin HD performs similarly well and includes a long list of useful features. Dolphin Mini, on the other hand, doesn’t have quite as much to offer, and unless you have an older device, you’ll probably want to pass it up.

If you’re after pure speed, Opera Mini is the way to go. It is by far the fastest option in the Android Marketplace, but bear in mind that you’re far more likely to run into website incompatibilities, particularly on sites with dynamic content; however, it does make an excellent supplement for browsing when a fast connection is unavailable. Skyfire, too, offers similar speedy benefits, but without the sacrifice of standard web features.

  • You said stock browser, how about the hardware accelerated browser on the Samsung Galaxy S II?
  • Nexus S has a single-core A8 processor ... which probably is the most widespread platform. But I don't think that the browsers' performance on it is representative for the dual-core A9 platforms that are all the rage this days. Not to mention that the customizations to the default browsers that are made by Samsung or for the Tegra2+Honeycomb platforms. I think there are both dual-core rendering optimizations, and specific GPU optimizations in the default browser for Honeycomb+Tegra2.

    I think you should mention that you were testing on a popular platform, but a slightly older one.
  • darkchazz
    KeyboardWarrirorYou said stock browser, how about the hardware accelerated browser on the Samsung Galaxy S II?Agreed, I have the S2 and the stock browser is silky smooth there's not a single hint of lag even when viewing hd flash video on youtube.

    Also I wonder why toms keeps praising firefox, it's very laggy even on the simplest websites , half baked, and crashes alot.

    Opera mobile is my alternative browser of choice, it's very smooth with excellent text reflow..
    I like Dolphin hd as well but there's a bit of lag when scrolling especially on complicated websites.
  • I wonder why Miren Browser wasn't mentioned. I have been using it for quite a while and am very happy with it...
  • andywork78
    Tom's you forgot xScope and Boat. Does are good Browser too~ ^^
    Next time if you have a chance please test does browser too please
  • neve
    I've tried most of these and I keep returning to xScope
  • gstar42
    I would like to know which browsers route all page requests through their own servers rather than directly from the specified URL. This is a security issue.
  • I think you have to take into account the installed size and startup times for these packages. According to the market Firefox takes over 14 MB while Dolphin HD is around 3.25 MB. On an HTC Desire Firefox takes up 20% of the total available app space, is incredibly slow to start, shows a splash screen and does some strange font rendering where they blur into view as if they were bitmapped images. If I'm trying to hit a website while out and about on 3G, that's insta-fail. Dolphin starts instantly and does none of that stuff. I'm counting that as a solid win for Dolphin.
  • gnfishin
    I assume the mobile page load speed tests were on 3g, however, I would like to have had the comparison made on LTE mobile (Verizon), as well. It is possible that the variations between browser page load speeds might be closer on the substantially faster Verizon 4g LTE network. While not available everywhere, yet, it is available in all major cities and all major airports and is expanding rapidly.
  • As for the comparisons, it is very hard to do them, as none of the contenders are perfect but take very different approaches (see Mini for example), and you try to display pages that are meant to be for PCs. And for example in scrolling tests did you disable Flash? Because other way comparison to non-Flash supporting Firefox is not fair. In my experience, Opera Mobile's scrolling performance is superior to every other browser, and has the only scrolling experience without checkerboard. Opera Mobile also has Websocket support disabled by default (for security reasons).

    juliantz: I see your point but comparing Dolphin to Firefox/Opera for size is not valid, as Dolphin uses the default browser's engine (see HTML5 results for example), hence it saves some space as - the main - parts of it are already there in the Android system. Opera Mobile has a ARMv5 version available, which cuts down size significantly, see here: