Update: A new rumor claims the iPhone 14 Pro will come with USB-C connectivity.
The Lightning port on the new iPhone 13 remains a persistent annoyance considering the rest of the tech world, including the new iPad mini 6, have switched to USB-C. It seems the European Union has had enough of Apple sticking to its proprietary tech.
As reported by the New York Times, the EU has unveiled new legislation that would standardize phone charging ports among phone manufacturers, requiring that all new phones use USB-C from 2024 onward.
This could mean that the 2023 or 2024 iPhone would finally come with a USB-C port, in Europe at least. Granted, it would be silly for Apple to sell USB-C iPhones in Europe and Lightning iPhones everywhere else. So, if this legislation passes, it could effectively kill a proprietary port that was first introduced in 2012.
- iPhone 13 review
- iPhone 13 Pro Max review
- Plus: Future iPad Pros could have a neat design quirk — here's how
"Chargers power all our most essential electronic devices. With more and more devices, more and more chargers are sold that are not interchangeable or not necessary," said Thierry Breton, the European commissioner for trade in a press release. "We are putting an end to that. With our proposal, European consumers will be able to use a single charger for all their portable electronics — an important step to increase convenience and reduce waste."
According to the Times, Apple is not a fan of the proposed legislation. Apple argues that switching to USB-C would effectively create more waste. "We remain concerned that strict regulation mandating just one type of connector stifles innovation rather than encouraging it, which in turn will harm consumers in Europe and around the world," an Apple spokesperson told TechRadar.
But that argument seemingly ignores the fact that USB-C has been standard for years across multiple devices, including many of Apple's own products. And considering Apple doesn't include a charger with its phones anymore and that the iPhone 13 line supports 20W charging speeds, lay consumers might go out to buy Apple's own 20W fast charging brick instead of using one they might already own.
Many consumers look at charge ports as either iPhone or Samsung, not Lightning or USB-C. This EU legislation would essentially unify charging, potentially lessening iPhone vs. Android port confusion.
Apple also contends that regulating one particular technology would stifle innovation. If the EU had mandated such a law back in 2009, the argument goes, that might have prevented both Lightning and USB-C from taking off. Breton dismissed that as a stock response from tech companies any time this type of legislation is proposed.
The proposal must be voted on by the European Parliament and then adopted by device makers, so it could be some time before we see USB-C as the standard. We expect more pushback by Apple in the meantime.
So what happens when USB-C becomes obsolete or evolves to another form?
Have they legislated what an AC plug and voltages are throughout the EU, or are they only concerned with products which (as far as I can see) they don't make?
There are European standards for AC voltages, plugs and sockets that are widely encouraged but not necessarily enforced. Often the EU is reduced to issuing directives, but it is still up to the sovereign nations to produce and enforce laws. There are some fantastic standards in electromagnetic compatibility and safety, which are similar to FCC, UL, CSA but again can lower the cost of bringing product to market - since I can have one set of agency approvals that apply to products being sold in EU rather than the bad old days when we had NEMKO, SEMKO, DEMKO, FIMKO, TUV, GS, BS, ...
and the use of the CE mark on products is helpful to consumers who can be sure that the products are safe, and have been tested to health and environmental standards. If the EU wants to make sure that products sold in the EU meet our needs, then surely manufacturers should consider how to meet the demands of the customer, not try to enforce their own proprietary standards through inaction ?