Download the
Tom's Guide App from the AppsStore
News and trends on internet
/ mobile / "sound & picture" / IT
Yes No

Xbox 360 to Get 802.11n Wi-Fi Adapter

- By - Source : Tom's Guide US

Faster Wi-Fi for the 360.

A new Microsoft Wi-Fi adapter is coming for the Xbox 360. This, of course, is an add-on accessory for the console as it is the only current generation runner without built-in wireless.

With the firming up of the 802.11n, Microsoft seems to be ready to launch a brand new, upgraded wireless accessory for the console, as Engadget caught floating through the FCC.

The version spied at the FCC includes two antennas, perhaps opening up for dual-band possibilities with the high-end Wireless-N routers.

One advantage of going with 802.11n is the increased range, leading to stronger signals for Halo trash-talking even if you're far from the router.

Share:
29
Comments
X

Comments

thackstonns 09/15/2009 11:14 PM
Hide
-5+

I like my setup better. N router wired to xbox. Everything else in the house wireless n. Bought the n router for less than Microsoft's g adapter

CptTripps 09/15/2009 11:20 PM
Hide
-2+

Yeah, my 360 and HTPC are both hard wired and all other devices wireless G. I have N adapters in two laptops and on my desktop so an upgrade would be cool, but not necessary atm.

rcmaniac25 09/15/2009 11:25 PM
Hide
-2+

Hopefully they will lower the cost on this instead of charging $100 for it.

thackstonns 09/15/2009 11:28 PM
Hide
-2+

I am sure the upgrade is so that they can still justify 100 for it. Now that n is getting cheap enough for Microsoft to make a hefty profit.

Anonymous 09/15/2009 11:30 PM
Hide
-4+

One of the reasons I havent bought a 360 is its lack of built in wireless and the fact that you have to pay monthly for online gaming.

hellwig 09/15/2009 11:33 PM
Hide
-2+

People complained about the price of the PS3 when it first came out (and yes, it was very high). But to turn the 360 into a PS3-like machine (HD-DVD drive, Wireless adapter), made the console cost even more than a PS3. If you didn't need wireless, and were smart enough to avoid HD-DVD, yeah, you saved some money over the PS3. At the same time, you can't feel smart getting a 360 then paying out the ass for add-on's that come standard with the other console.

That said, when is the 360 getting Blu-Ray?

Hanin33 09/15/2009 11:59 PM
Hide
-1+

i though enjoy the fact that the 360 is modular and allows one to have the choice of their accessories... as some posters stated, they run on the wire anyway and others have particular needs for external antennas and the ability to upgrade to a faster or particular wireless standard to werk in their environment... integration is nice sometimes, till something breaks and/or your need something that the integrated device can not provide....

theLaminator 09/16/2009 12:03 PM
Show
horendus 09/16/2009 12:05 PM
Show
matt_b 09/16/2009 12:07 PM
Hide
-3+

Even better, how about they do a console update releasing it WITH the adapter (or at least the old g adapter), not to mention a few other fixes/updates (namely -> hardware).

trevorvdw 09/16/2009 12:40 PM
Hide
-2+

theLaminator :
@hellwigconsidering Sony would have to allow Microsoft to use their blue ray technology I'd say whenever they license it to Microsoft



Actually....

Blu-ray wasn't made by Sony. Sony is just one company out of 19 that are on the board of directors of the Blu-ray Disc Association. So its not Sony's call although they could pressure the rest of the members I suppose.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blu-ray_Disc_Association

ssalim 09/16/2009 12:58 PM
Hide
--2+

They better sell the wireless adapter for dirt cheap for those who already bought older xbox360!

matt87_50 09/16/2009 1:57 AM
Hide
-0+

thats cool. still don't get what's so hard about running wires. does the 360 have gigabit?

and Sony is the biggest player in bluray, the original format being created just by them and Phillips. Some of it may be that they are just gonna say its a gaming machine (which is fair enough) untill digital downloads are feasible - and it is alot more feasible on a locked console than on a pc - which is nearly here. but some of it would also be that they just don't wanna 'give in' to sony.

I only have a ps3, and I prefer my blurays to digital downloads any day. even when digital downloads match the quality of bluray, and our net is reliable and fast enough to stream it, and it doesn't cost us a fortune in bandwidth, even then, the gay drm schemes they will come up with just put me off (look at pc gaming, they still haven't got it right)

nitto555rchallenger 09/16/2009 2:00 AM
Hide
--1+

Its still not built-in, that would be serious news if they dropped the xbox price with a built-in wireless adapter.

nitto555rchallenger 09/16/2009 2:04 AM
Hide
-3+

hellwig :
That said, when is the 360 getting Blu-Ray?

Never, Microsoft has officially stated that they'll never have the 360 play blue-ray ever. Anyway they have Netflix that could stream HD content.

CoryInJapan 09/16/2009 2:41 AM
Hide
-1+

Adapter is the problem here...They should just make wifi a built in feature like the ps3 and wii did.

starryman 09/16/2009 4:12 AM
Hide
-2+

CoryInJapan :
Adapter is the problem here...They should just make wifi a built in feature like the ps3 and wii did.



Exactly. I never understood the idiocy of the media when they bitched about the PS3 price of $600 when it came out. A XBOX360 at that time was $399 with a hard drive 1/3 the size plus $100 for the wireless adapter showed that the PS3 was a value proposition.

FYI - I own both the XBOX 360 and PS3... I never bought the wireless adapter for the XBOX360 since I bridge my laptops wireless internet to it. And my PS3 died after about using it 20-30 times (the bluray drive was toast even though I played about 12 blurays).

rebel conquest 09/16/2009 4:29 AM
Hide
--1+

Really..... Another PS3 vs 360 debate.

Props for originality.

Master Exon 09/16/2009 4:30 AM
Hide
-1+

Everyone ready to pay $200 for it?

captaincharisma 09/16/2009 4:46 AM
Hide
-0+

and yet neither system wins ever in these debates

Anonymous 09/16/2009 4:58 AM
Hide
-1+

what's the advantage of using wireless n on a gaming console? the bottleneck will still be your internet access speed which is probably 2-10mb for most people.. and at wireless g, you can pretty much stream HD video pretty smooth.

kashifme21 09/16/2009 8:49 AM
Hide
--2+

Xbox 360 in general is way overpriced.. i mean its a 3 year old pc at 299usd we could almost get a new pc for that price. IMO its a ripoff and to self termination.

Plus games and accessories cost a lot more then pc versions. IMO at this point in time pc gaming in cheaper then getting an xbox or a ps3 for that matter.

anamaniac 09/16/2009 9:11 AM
Hide
--1+

Fuck it.
I have no need for wireless.

I had a damned long cord laying around, so why would I buy a wireless for a static object?

Andraxxus 09/16/2009 11:33 AM
Hide
-0+

Better be cheap but most likely it won't.

AndrewMD 09/16/2009 2:50 PM
Hide
--1+

Well if Microsoft decides to keep both Wireless Adapters in the SKUs then you might be able to get the older one between $40.00-$50.00.

As far as the price I could see this retail for $99.99 Again this is not required hardware to run the 360 since it does have a Network Jack built in.

And while most people here complain and compare that the PS3 has both the WII ONLY has Wireless and you have to purchase a Network dongle separately.

The only thing Sony has proven is even thier name isn't enough for poeple to justify purchasing their console!

gmcboot 09/16/2009 4:43 PM
Hide
-1+

Can someone please tell me what is with this obsession with Blue Ray and the 360. Buy a Blue Ray player already and be happy. In a couple years the damn things will be $89 at target next to the Tide detergent. It not worth Microsoft putting it into 360.
+
Sony has been trailing for the past 24 months because of all the cost (and complexity) they put into the PS3. Many people, like myself, refused to pay $399+ for a PS3. When it dropped to $299 I brought one a week later. I now have games for both systems AND a Blue Ray player. The 360 v PS3 argument is old. Both have their positives and negatives.

As for the adapter, it should be cheap, no more than $50 bucks if that. Anybody who didn't buy the 360 because it didn't included wireless .. really.. really.. These must be the same people who cannot drive their car when the battery runs out in the alarm remote.

Major7up 09/16/2009 7:59 PM
Hide
-0+

Wiring is cheaper still, I bought 300 feet of cat5e at Fry's with the crimp tool for $25 (was on sale from $49.99 normal price tag) and you can't beat that.

hakesterman 09/16/2009 8:07 PM
Hide
--1+

A complete waist of time. Make it built in and than you have something. What are you thinking
Microsoft?????????????????????????????????????????????????????

AndrewMD 09/16/2009 11:35 PM
Hide
-0+

Hakesterman - What Microsoft is thinking is furture upgradability for its customers.