awnnn....

i agree with loggin method

Wow... people used it for porn so much it took this much time for them to respond back to it.... I am IMPRESSED! Good job guys!

I love BING, it is a very impressive search engine.

me 2 I use it second to google.

whats the deal with sex anyways.

A 10 yr old has probably seen what Rambo can do with a machine gun

You can enlist in the army at the age of 17 and start killing people. but you aren't allowed to drink until you're 21.

The legal system in the US is seriously flawed.

i dont get it, whats so bad if children see a porn site???? WTF they get cancer or what?
Jesus let them see wtf to do and how, filter the homosexual content and stuff only ...

You know, I really don't like Microsoft, but I really do appreciate what they've done with porn. I hope they don't water it down because people complain.

Hell, I'll complain too so I sound holier than though too. But, not at the risk of them diluting the wall of porn that is quickly becoming part of the fabric of American culture. It's got to stop before we lose this! What is it to be American, but to enjoy porn? Microsoft should be applauded for making it even easier with their mouse over play feature. It's this type of innovation that shows Microsoft isn't wasting their billions in research dollars.

I would suggest they rename Internet Explorer though. The name is real lame. I'd suggest "Porn Surfer", and the use of more sexually explicit controls. Or maybe they could do this as a special edition version of Internet Explorer, like those Monopoly special editions. And then refuse to allow this to be distributed to EU countries. Can you imagine the Dutch if they were denied the "Porn Surfer"? They'd leave the EU. Other people rebel against their government and finally put an end to the incessant fining if they were missing out on "feature rich" products like the Porn Surfer. Not that they'd admit to liking porn, of course, they'd say they were just supporting freedom of expression, or something like that.

Well Ciuy there are many reasons. Children shouldn't be exposed to sexual content at young ages and should be old enough to be taught responsibility and fully grasp what sex is before being exposed to it. There is no doubt that the average age of when kids first have sex is shrinking and this is no doubt because of our culture overwhelming with sexual messages. The last thing we need is to expose our children to porn and make the problem worse.

Also your a foolish bigot. Take your homophobic comments elsewhere.

Oh and also Ciuy its common for pedophiles to show children pornography and since you seem to think its a good idea... I certainly wouldn't trust you with any kids.

I got an idea; we should block all porn with a filter and call it "Green Dam." Another idea is parents can look after their kids and stop blaming everyone else.

NuclearShadow, check your facts. Over the last two decades the number of "kids" having sex earlier has declined. Also, the odds that they will use a condom their first time has increased. The proliferation of so called "sexual messages" has been offset by sex education and the wonderful global message board known as the internet that you and I are corresponding on right now.

Parents should hire a screening nanny that stays with the children while they surf online and checks the output for every input the children put in before the children can view the results to make sure the childrens' minds do not get warped by any unauthorized content. Not. Get it. That was a "not" joke.

Alright MS finally hit a home run, who knew microsoft knows how to put a search engine together. Google Watch Out.

What's the difference between Bing and Google with respect to having to log in? None, AFAICT.

So... why does Bing seem to be getting all the heat?

This phobia about kids and sexual content is all very american, it's a non-issue on the other side of the pond. As for myself I'd rather my kids look at porn than the evening news, it's less likely to scar the for life.

It's a sick and twisted society we live in when the kind of violence we've made common in our entertainment gets at best a shrug but even a hint of physical love is somehow dangerous and bad.

Bing is the final word in debauchery .

if u have msn account -> only then safe search off -> only then the adult? material .

look how microsoft could actually use porn as a bait to draw users towards msn .

Dont do that , and let it remain a great adult search engine , of which it really is a "breakthrough" porn server !

"Unfortunately, Bing doesn't offer hard-core settings to keep resourceful children from unlocking the SafeSearch feature."

Pathetic quote. Point me to the search engine that DOES do this? How is it unfortunate if we never had it to begin with. Unless there is some hyper tucked away engine I haven't heard of?

NuclearShadow: if you are gay please leave here, we don't like your kind. Gross. Go decorate your bathroom.

When I think "children" I am thinking under 13 as far as whom I would ABSOLUTELY not want to see porn. I know most of my friends had already seen porn once the teen years started. Not saying it was good/bad. I am just saying it is what it is. I would strongly prefer the young children not have any access to porn ... but that by and large will be up to me THE PARENT(s) ... to be a PARENT. So .. as a parent be AWARE and INVOLVED with your children and they will likely prosper regardless of porn or no porn. I am a PARENT and I am AWARE and INVOLVED with my children's lives daily. So I have a good idea what I am talking about.

My son is 13 and to be honest if Playboy comes up i would be OK with it... Its the hardcore which i think is an issue for kids (13 and below). I don't want him to get the wrong ideas.

you can die for your coutry @ 18 but can't drink till 21.... That is pretty F'd. In Canada drinking is 18... but most people start grade 8-9-10

Nice. Now, all you'd have to do at home to keep the kiddies out, is Set OpenDNS up, and block the explicit.bing.com domain. Pretty easy stuff...

Bing!!..... for all your porn thing.
Sure this is a MS product?

They did something right?

Unbelievable....

I'm using Bing.com only for the porn preview feature, if they start filtering porn then I will not be interested anymore in Bing.com.

kids have been sitting next to boinking parents in teepees for 10k years, stop trying to pretend that life's most natural act is going to damage them.

childen won't be affected by playboy magazine, etc...(and girl-on-girl porn) but they will be affected by 'facials' (i.e ahhhh drop'n loads...) and anything thing degrading, and humiliating)
but then again that stuff is only available on the file sharing sites...